similar to: Problems balancing two uplink providers

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No

I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb. DOWNLINK=2304 UPLINK=1024 DEV=wlan0 No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to allow the script to run. When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expected a speed closer to the DOWNLINK. Am I missing something here? TIA, -- -Wes Hegge Technical

Hello all, Just wondering if it can be done? 2 site, 2 linux boxes (1 at each side), each site has 2 internet connections. Can you create a VPN over those connections to utilize both? It would seem like it would need 2 vpn''s (1 for each pair). Any info is appreciated. Sam

Hi guys! Im new there, and i havent found yet stories about uplink bandwith limits, and i would like to limit my Exim''s speed, coz its eating my ADSL''s whole uplink. Til now i used the #:~ tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 50kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 command, buts its limiting the whole link:/ I checked the documents on that link:

Hi all, Given below ia the simple network diagram. I need to control uplink for the individual private network IPs as depicted in the diagram. Is this possible in a NATed environment using CBQ or HTB. I learnt that we can control only outgoing traffic. So if I control in the eth1 interface the source IP will be masqueraded, and it may not result in the desired behaviour. Is there a solution to

I''ve been trying - without success - to aggregate the bandwidth of 3 DSL modems using the instructions in the HowTo (sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2). I _believe_ I''m following the instructions to the letter, but when I add the last command (the "ip route" with "nexthop") then nothing goes out through the modems. Each modem works when I add a single default gateway

Hello! I have access server with 4 uplinks (nice, huh?). I ran RedHat 7.3. Yesterday I did an upgrade to RedHat 9. After upgrade Linux says the third link is bad: # ip route show 2.2.2.0/30 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.0/30 dev eth4 scope link src 4.4.4.4 3.3.3.0/29 dev eth3 scope link src 3.3.3.3 1.1.1.0/28 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 scope link

Hi, I have an ESXi server, on top of it I have created one VM whose IP address is 192.168.79.1. I want to connect to the VM on ESXi server from my host machine but I am not able to do it. I have created a network "networkforSC" and I have pasted my xml file content below but I am not able to add any uplink (how to add it?) . Below is the xml file of my node as well as the network which

Hi everyone, I''m controling the uplink traffic bandwidth between two ethernet linux computers, but it seems like even the download bandwidth gets limited then i''ve got trouble on that because my intention is  shaping the conection on an asymetric way (ADSL).  Lately, I''m going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worried and i''m not figuring out at all, the

Hello, I''m following this HOWTO http://linux-ip.net/html/adv-multi-internet.html to route outgoing SSH from a secondary ISP. I can see using tcpdump,jnettop,iftop that when one of the computers located in my internal network is trying to SSH to a box online using SSH, packets are routed via the secondary internet ethernet card. However, packets don''t seem to know how to get back.

I''ve got a rather complex beast of a network that I''ve beeing trying to get properly routed for some time now. I''ve come really close, in that inbound traffic gets where it''s supposed to, and outbound traffic goes where it''s supposed to, but outbound packets are all apparently going over the wrong link. The system is currently configured as a

helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth: we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that the borrowing method on one device by itself, e.g. ppp0, alone using HTB or the like. this means that i have to create for another device, e.g. ppp1,

Hi Can someone please help with the following, We are using asterisk@home 1.5 and SIP trunks to communicate to the PSTN network. We are having some problems with the call quality. Although we can hear the other person's voice quite clear when making or receiving a call, we get complaints from the people on the other end saying that our voices sound very unclear, low and that the voice

I''ve installed Shorewall 3.0.5 on a Debian Sarge box, and I''m attempting to route internet traffic through a couple of ISPs, and I''ve come up against some problems. The first is that one of my links is a pppoe connection to a wireless modem, and I can''t configure it to have a static IP address... therefore I can''t see how I can set up the two

Hi list, I have a problem I thought was simple first, but now I''m stuck. In a nutshell, it''s about redundant uplinks at an outside location. Crude ASCII-Art follows: Internet | | +------------+ | cisco with | | uplinks | +------------+ | | ATM interface +----------+ ... | alvarion | | | wireless

Hello, Ive had a poke around through various linux routing documents, but haven''t found what I think is an elegant solution to a routing issue I''m having with a hosting provider and RHEL ES 4 running in a VMware VM. Here''s a diagram of the situation : Default route at provider our host (A) 72.3.230.1/26 ---- 72.3.230.30/26 the VM (B)

provide me complete detail of your linux box like firewall script (iptables script), kernel''s .config file, multigatway file (i.e. /sbin/ip ....... commands file) so i can check and try to resolve your issue. sonu.... --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I configured a router box to use 2 providers, as described in the HOWTO. (Apendix 1) I want to use both links to reach a single smtp server. As I read in the kptd and in some old messages of this list, doing a SNAT in the postrouting chain comes _after_ the routing desision. So I guess the following lines I''m trying to use are wrong. (See Apendix 1) What can I do to have multiple

Hi. Contents: 1) Introduction 2) 2 Questions * Introduction: I used this HOWTO to use multiple providers. http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html The box is a load balancer, using the Linux Virtual Server. We have a problem with lost connections, and it seems you get issues when you combine this setup with DNAT [1]. The proposed solution [1] is to use these rules to mark

Next week I''m replacing my single SDSL connection with two ADSL connections. I''ve got a plan for dealing with this, but I''d like any thoughts on potential problems I might run into. My goal is not to load balance the bandwidth (yet), but I do want to run all traffic through a single router. At the moment this router only has one ethernet port for both of the ADSL