similar to: Split bursty bandwidth equally

Hi all, Newbie to the group. Just started using Opus as part of a WebRTC project and amazed by the versatility of the codec. Great stuff!!!! I have been trying to understand the performance of Opus inband FEC in the presence of bursty loss. Although I do not have exact characterization of the loss profile, we are seeing issues over WiFi. RTCP reports about 33% loss, but I am guessing a lot of it

Hi, How can I set equal bandwidth of 512kbit downlink and 256kbit uplink for every single IP address of 254 IP addresses I have in my LAN? Regards, ro0ot

I have a 24 x 1TB system being used as an NFS file server. Seagate SAS disks connected via an LSI 9211-8i SAS controller, disk layout 2 x 11 disk RAIDZ2 + 2 spares. I am using 2 x DDR Drive X1s as the ZIL. When we write anything to it, the writes are always very bursty like this: ool 488K 20.0T 0 0 0 0 xpool 488K 20.0T 0 0 0 0 xpool

Hi all, I have an average 2mbit multicast stream that once in a while bursts high (up to 20mbit/s) in short periods (about 200ms). Could anyone please help me with directions using tc for configuing leaky bucket shaping to this stream? I have a 5mbit/s ceiling. My system is running gentoo linux 2.6.14, and I have compiled in all QoS modules. Thanks. Oivind

ALL: <<diffserv-gred_10-06>> I have attached the current script that I am using. $TC qdisc add dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred setup DPs 3 default 2 grio $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 1 limit $lim min $minTh max $maxTh avpkt $avgPL burst $bursty bandwidth $netBand probability 0.02 prio 2 $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 2 limit $lim min $minTh max

Here's a very odd question - I don't know if anybody can even begin to answer. I am attempting something very odd and geeky. I set up an icecast Win32 server streaming a 96kbps mp3 stream (using all the latest as of today software, winamp, icecast2 and oddcast v3) so I can listen to it on my cell phone while at work. My phone does GPRS EDGE data at 131kbps-ish, just barely fast enough to

Hey list I have almost gotten my shaping setup up and running as planned. The last barrier seems to be tcp overshooting availible bandwidth when its starting a transfer, and thereby bursting the line, so ping rises for a moment. At least this is my best guess at the problem :) There is a possibility that its just plain old traffic being bursty for some reason.. I am using bittorrent to test this,

Hi! I have a Traffic Control/QoS question about the W(RED - Random Early Detection/Discard) curve implementation in the Traffic Control environment. Is this the right curve for RED - has it been tried to be implemented in the Traffic Control environment?: An Analytical RED Function Design Guaranteeing Stable System Behavior: http://www.ist-mobydick.org/publications/aqm_iscc2003.pdf Citat:

(By the way, upgrading to .11 seemed to take care of the skipping. Thanks!) The stream seems to be working just fine, although Winamp is showing bandwidth at 130 or higher, occasionally up to 145 or so. Most of my MP3s are 128 kbps, and ices should be re-encoding everything as 128 anyway. This is really a minor issue... but I'm wondering what could be taking up the extra bandwidth? Or

Hello All Its first time i posting to this mail list :). I have done something (maybe) important. I write new IMQ device driver based from Martin Devera and Patrick McHardy implementation with device EOS support. My current implementation supporting only egress trafic shaping and kernel 2.4.25. For more details, source and examples have look at my page http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos Ill

Hello! I am running my linux box as a firewall in a bridge mode. Firewall is protecting a /24 network. I want to make that the bandwidth distributes equally to active nodes: if N nodes are accessing the internet simultaneous then each node gets bandwith/N. Is there any way to achieve this with shorewall? Thank you! BR, Jernej

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Geoff Shang wrote: > Mihai RUSU wrote: > > > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a new > > <limit> type entry). > > Problem with this is, what do you do once the limit has been reached? Who > do you kick? Or do you just not allow anymore listeners? I

Hi all, I buy a iriver's ifp-880 portable player, it only can play ogg file with bitrate 96kbps-325kbps. I know that the higher bitrate of file, the more cpu cycles to comsume in most case. For beyond 325kbps,I guess the chip (pnx0101) can't realtimely decode. But for ogg file below 96kbps, the cpu performance maybe isn't the bottleneck, and I suspect because of the limitation of

Hi, I''m fighting seriously with a most simple HTB setup. I''d like to share the incoming 64kbps into 5 and 59 for two different machines under NAT. HTB seems to hold the required limits when ceil is not set (no borrowing), but when borrowing enabled it seems to share equally rather then keeping the specified ratio. My setup is below. A typical output of "tc -s -d qdisc

> > > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a new > > > <limit> type entry). If you are running icecast2 on linux you can handle bandwidth limitations using QoS more specificly iproute2. That way icecast2 doesnt have to take up extra resources to handle bandwidth limitations. resources here cbq bash script

Here's a very odd question - I don't know if anybody can even begin to answer. I am attempting something very odd and geeky. I set up an icecast Win32 server streaming a 96kbps mp3 stream (using all the latest as of today software, winamp, icecast2 and oddcast v3) so I can listen to it on my cell phone while at work. My phone does GPRS EDGE data at 131kbps-ish, just barely fast enough to

I downloaded the HTB and ESFQ packages and installled the patched kernel and tools. Now can someone give me an example how to configure my system so that the 512Kbit are fairly divided for each computer ? Assume that eth0 is the interface on the WAN side and eth1 on the LAN side. Thanks _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

I am looking for a simple way to guarantee to each flow going through my traffic control point 1/numflows of bandwidth. I thought using SFQ would do this effectively but it appears to be quite unfair: a very high speed download that fills the pipe easily starves smaller flows to the point where it becomes unusable (especially if they are at all interactive) Because numflows is dynamic,

My branch that I've been working on for the last few weeks is now the mainline; once I add a few more modes (mode_A.h through mode_E.h, corresponding roughly to 128,160,192,256,350 kbps stereo) and Mike Smith and Chad get the modes into OggEnc, we'll be at beta 2. A few things to note: I'd been really really hoping that I'd squeeze the last bit of performance out of non

Hi Folks, I am a newbie in Qos... I could not find references to my question, then I am asking. This is the network: 192.168.1.2 --+ 192.168.1.3 --+ Router 192.168.1.4 --+ Linux/2.4 192.168.1.5 --+---- eth0 eth1 ---- internetprovider1 200.x.x.2 ----+ 200.x.x.3 ----+ 200.x.x.4 ----+ Other network: internetprovider2 ----- 200.y.y.6 (static IP) The link to internetprovider1 is