similar to: boring question

Hi, I have a question conercing wondershaper. I''m using the Clarkconnect linux distribution for my linux router and I tried to use wondershaper. On start up of wshaper, there are no errors or any other problems but I''m not sure if it''s running correctly. Only one qdisc / one class is used and when I start an uplink ftp transfer, my ping time is growing up to 1700ms - I

Hi all, Regular and avid readers of this column will know that Don Driscoll and I have recently posted two messages requesting assistance concerning an apparent failure of "se.contrast" to produce an se for a contrast. So far, an ominous silence rings in our ears, but read on Gentle Reader, and see if even the machinations of "debug" doesn't stimulate you to respond with a

In Sweden, where I live, it's snowing like crazy. The Stockholm area is covered in white stuff and there's really no reason to leave the computer and get out anywhere. More white stuff is coming down all the time. Boring. I am sure your weekend is no better - rain, snow or just another boring sunny day. Let's find something cool to do during this weekend! Join the cool crowd

--- "Daniel B. Miller" wrote: It looks to me like patch is trying to put each .cvsignore in the vp32 directory rather than the specified subdirectories such as Codecs/quicktime/. It seems like I need some option to get patch to use the 'Index:' commands. I looked at the man page, it goes on about how patch tries to derive the filenames, but I am still confused. Any help would

I think I'll start with the simple stuff, just to be safe. :-) Here are some cvsignore updates, and a fix for the inter-project dependencies in the MSVC *.dsw file. Cheers, Eric -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: vp32-cvs-ignore-patch.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1524 bytes Desc: vp32-cvs-ignore-patch.diff Url :

[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 This is effective but is there any way to

Hi all, I have read the larc howto and I need to apply a traffic shaper with this configuration: router / two interface etho and eth1 lan lan is on eth1 and on eth0 I''ve the dsl connection (1.2 Mbit / 256 kbit) I need to limit the bandwith towards lan and I''ve thought at HTB and tcng. I write the script belove. I want limit the p2p and ftp (ssh and irc) connection at 15

I would like to know if there is a rule that can be created in iptables that would allow a samba server shares to be seen on the internal LAN. The interface is on eth0 the ip address of eth0 is 192.168.0.1. It seems that when I applied a firewall I have blocked smb from showing up. Now the users cannot see any shares via Network Neighborhood , but I can map a drive via

Hi Stef, Reffering to page < http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/7.html > I found a para as follows, " CBQ is not always as accurate as it should be. See docum.org on the test page for some tests with bounded classes. The algorithm used by cbq is very "link sensitive". It calculates the link idle time and for that it needs the real link bandwidth, average

Hello i was wondering how i can change the IP address information for my Asterisk box, IP addy, Gateway, DNS. I have a smoothwall router that i am using and i am tring to put the Asterisk box on the orange interface so if anyone can help me please i can use it. Thanks alot William Ray -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

Folks, I am a little bit confuse in how to put these packets into correct mangle table for traffic shaping. This is what i ve planned to do: - - - - :eth0 [ LINUX-BOX ] eth1: - - - - Let say: eth0: 220.100.1.1 eth1: 192.168.1.1 eth1:1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.0/24 get natted into 220.100.1.1 before reaching the internet. I put every packets coming from internet (eth0) this way: # iptables -t

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Hi, I am new to the Linux Advance Routing Project and to Policy Based Routing as implemented in Linux.... but I have been using Linux for 10 years so not _really_ a newbie.... Looking at the lartc.org website I came across the reference implementation of a traffic shaper... I also have Matt Marsh''s book on ''Policy Based Routing using Linux'' which covers traffic

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

I have a network with RH7.2 (netbois name "server"), Mandrake 8.1 ("Linuxbox"), Smoothwall ("Smoothwall"), WinNT ("di-bosco"), Win 98 ("robertw" & "Nicole") x 2 and Win 2k ("DiBosco2k"). Smoothwall is the DHCP server. Why would it be that all the Windows machines can ping to a netbios name, eg ping server, ping Linuxbox

Hi all, I have been trying to investigate traffic shaping in an effort to solve the "unfriendly network apps" problem on a test network. I have a basis by which I''d like to shape traffic, but studying the howto doesn''t uncover and existing qdisc that seems to fit what I would like to do. The problem I would like to address is to prevent an IP address opening 10

Hi all, I have found problems in p2p traffic detection. The ipp2p module works fine but in shorewall the rules written for this protocols never match because the initials p2p connection (login) match in ''-m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT'' rule before ''-m ipp2p --ipp2p -j DROP'' rule, so netfilter never filter p2p traffic. I have had to run

Hi, I have typical situation, local LAN with private addresses, translated via NAT to internet. I need to shape ingress traffic (from internet to local LAN) in several HTB queues accorting to destination (private not public) IP. So I need mark packets to divide them to corresponding queue. According to http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/kptd/ I thing I have only one way how to do it, because

now, i''m learning and try to read a lot of article about tc command in linux for setting traffic shaper. but i''m doubt about In the theory about tc command ... In general, we define class under root qdisc but Is it can be possible ???? If we define another qdisc under root qdisc, Can i do it? because i have just read tc command syntax and i found this point ... syntax: tc qdisc