Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Re: split route and kernel panic"
2007 Feb 21
10
Split access, load balancing AND forwarding: HOW?
The LARTC howto correctly describes load balancing and split
access for traffic from a machine with multiple ISP connections
(http://www.lartc.org/lartc.html#LARTC.RPDB.MULTIPLE-LINKS) --
*provided* the traffic originates from the machine itself (i.e.
traffic regularly handled by the INPUT and OUTPUT chains of
iptables).
When forwarding traffic from an attached local network, the
following
2005 Jan 03
8
load balancing and DNAT
Does anyone know if load balancing and DNAT work well together? I know
that load balancing and NAT do not, but what about a simple port forward?
I can''t apply Julian Anastasov''s patches, because they don''t work with
PPTP patches. :/
Anyhow, a simple:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport xxx -j DNAT --to
yyy:xxx
iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 -d yyy -p
2006 Oct 12
0
help
lartc-request@mail
man.ds9a.nl To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Sent by: cc:
lartc-bounces@mail Subject: LARTC Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13
2007 May 10
0
FW: Load balancing using connmark
-----Original Message-----
From: Salim S I [mailto:salim.si@cipherium.com.tw]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:22 PM
To: ''Francis Brosnan Blazquez''
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Load balancing using connmark
"I think the main advantage of shorewall solution is that it applies
connmark to incoming packets from the wan as you point, leaving load
balancing to outgoing connections to the
2006 Jan 30
0
loadbalancing multipath routing frequently freezes udp connections
hi
i recently searched in the mailinglist archive and found similar
problems, whose solutions helped very much, thank you.
i have the following scenario:
a firewall with one lan interface
eth0 10.1.1.1/24
and two uplink interfaces
eth1 10.2.2.1/24
eth2 10.3.3.1/24
each uplink interface does SNAT:
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to-source 10.2.2.1
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING
2004 Aug 02
5
Route policy preference value
Assuming if I have rules matching the same packet,
the one chosen is the lower preference value or
the high ?
For example
# ip rule list
....
100 from 192.168.1.0/24 lookup main
200 from all fwmark 5 lookup first
.....
Packet is matching both rules, the one with priority/preference
100 or 200 is selected ?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list /
2006 Jan 04
0
"Established connection" issues using multipath
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:28:47AM +0100, <Alpt>:
~> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:29:21AM +0100, <Alpt>:
~> ~> The multipath code creates new cached routes. Since
~> ~> after connect the socket is "connected", i.e. saddr and
~> ~> daddr are known and they are always provided when resolving
~> ~> route
~> ~>
~> ~> So, the connected
2004 Aug 17
2
Two Adsl connections following lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html instructions....
I have two adsl lines on my linux firewall box and i want to do some load balance between them...i tried a lot of different things, but it isn´t working...Following the instructions of http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html i used the configuration above. using "iptraf" I can see some few packets using the ppp1 connection, but almost all the packets use ppp0 connection.
2006 Jan 05
5
multiple links and nat
Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much
information online.
I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple
upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the
instructions in lartc section 4.2
(http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear
and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial
2004 May 04
0
multipath routing question
Hi All,
I have a linux router, configured with two internet connections and two
lan segments. I''ve setup multipath routing as described in
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
My problem (I think) is that somehow the router will randomly choose
incorrect routing paths for different hosts, for example:
on my workstation (192.168.1.20), I ssh to a server I have on an
2006 Feb 02
0
Problem with routing to multiple tables
Hello all,
I am having some difficults to make a routing rule
work. I want that every P2P packages go to one interface (eth2 - cheaper
link) nad the rest of the traffic go to another interface (eth0 - frame
relay very expensive).
I am using this script to make the mark and
balance:
-------
#!/bin/bash
IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables"
IP="/sbin/ip"
#----
# Declara redes
#----
2005 May 11
0
Multi-homed faq or docs needed
I tried to implement a multi-homed box using this faq
4.2.1 split access
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
But it says table is invalid. Can someone tell me
what the difference is in Centos? I assume the FAQ is
leaving out how to add tables to the iproute files?
I am trying to have eth0 and eth1 service two
different subnets for apache and not act as a
2007 Sep 05
6
NAT-aware traffic analysis
I have tried using iptraf for my NAT firewall to analyse the IP traffic.
Basically I am faced with this difficulty of related the source IP
to the outgoing interface to the internet, so I am wondering if
anyone has a suggestion for a different ways to do it, or a suggestion
for a better tool.
Details :-
Supposed : eth0 - LAN
eth1 - WAN1
eth2 - WAN2
And then
2007 May 09
10
Load balancing using connmark
Hi,
I''ve been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based
on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y por
apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano!
Once implemented, I''ve found that due to some reason packets aren''t
properly marked (or improperly remarked) and sent out using the wrong
interface.
My topo setup is:
2007 Jan 29
1
Questions about mutiple providers
Hi, this is my first post to the list.
I have googled a lot, and still cannot find a proper solution. I hope
someone here will be able to shed some light on my doubts.
I have set up a firewall using kernel 2.6.15 (Debian) that does NAT for
100 clients, and uses two different ISPs, using the howto found at
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html. I have *not*
2007 Nov 06
1
dead router detection
Hi all
I would like to know what happens with a dead router in a multipath
configuration like the one presented
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
Do i need to monitor dead routers and reconfigure ?
Guillermo
2002 Oct 29
1
the routing cache and route selection; is this correct?
Hello all,
I do not read C very well (especially kernel C). Though I have tried to
muddle my way through an understanding of what''s going on in fib_hash.c,
fib_rules.c, and route.c, I have not succeeded to my satisfaction, hence
my post.
I''m trying to document the general process of route selection, and have
come up with the following overview. Could somebody point out any
2007 Apr 12
0
two NICs on the same subnet
What are the reasons that two NICs on the same
computer are set to the same subnet?
i.e. eth0 IP addresses is x.y.z.m and eth1 is x.y.z.n.
Any websites describing these in details?
http://lartc.org/lartc.html#LARTC.RPDB.MULTIPLE-LINKS
"4.2. Routing for multiple uplinks/providers"
have two cases (Split access and Load balancing) for
two or more internet connections on the same computer
2006 Feb 02
1
routing question: multipath routing for SIP
I have two T1s and I'd like to split my SIP traffic over the two. I am
looking at this:
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
what bothers me about it is the note "Note that balancing will not be
perfect, as it is route based, and routes are cached. This means that routes
to often-used sites will always be over the same provider.". If all my
traffic goes to the same
2002 Sep 04
0
RPDB && routing locally generated (and marked) traffic
Hello all,
I''m using iproute2 + ipchains and have a question about locally generated
packets.
I have noticed that I have no problem marking packets in the input chain
from sources other than my router. These packets are marked and routed
exactly as I expect.
Now supposing I want to mark particular outbound packets which are locally
generated. The only solution I have found so far