similar to: In/Out

Hello again all, Question: I have a number of users, who need to be shaped at different rates. My question is this: Is there a way that I can shape both *inbound* and *outbound* traffic to not exceed a single threshold, ie. they can get x kbps traffic in or x kbps out, but no more than x kbps in/out combined? Best Regards, -AL.

Thanks, The only issue here is that for each service I need to create 200 child classes if I have 200 clients... Let me explain the problem better I have the following connection from my ISP: (1024/1024) (rate/ceil) 1) First, I want to divide the 1024 into smaller pieces based on priority: 256/256 - P2P (I want to limit the P2P traffic as much as possible) 256/1024 - HTTP 256/1024 - FTP

Hello guys, I need to accomplish 2 tasks with one Linux router: 1) Shape the traffic based on services (e.g. HTTP max 512 kbps, P2P max 128 kbps - with a lower prio, etc) 2) After I have classified the traffic based on services, I want to pass it to the clients with different rates/ceils (one client will get 8/128 kbps, other 8/64 kbps, etc). If all the users are downloading via P2P I do not

Hello good day to all ... this is my setup 1 Linux Wireless Access Point, connected are 4 wireless gateway in which i needed to apply shaping ... ok here is the weird part... clients on each gateway download files from the Acess Point ... a 500 mb file through ftp on gateway 1 which is up to 64 kbps ... the result is from 60-64 kbps speed which is fine ... on gateway 2 which is 128 kbps ... the

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Hello All, I'm not certain that I have my firewall setup to perform traffic shaping correctly for *. I'm using a m0n0wall running on a Soekris 4501 platform. I have traffic shaping set to provide IAX port 4569 with priority outbound access from LAN to WAN. All other outbound access is lower priority. This should in theory accomodate my ADSL connection which is 1.5 Mbps inbound but only

Thread-split from the vorbis-mailing list ("Vorbis determined to be as good as MPC at 128 kbps!") <p>On Sun, 30 May 2004, Segher Boessenkool wrote: [Steven So] SS>> If iTunes AAC can encode castanets with much less pre-echo at SS>> ABR 128 kbps, then hopefully there will be an imaginative SS>> (and non-patented) way of doing this in Vorbis without the SS>>

>>> Agustín Dall'Alba <agustin at dallalba.com.ar> schrieb am 14.04.2017 um 22:53 in Nachricht <CAHBqS-w3v44WM5x+_4XdFMkD42A2iYTbEWKEBmvJc2P3Y-LJGA at mail.gmail.com>: > I halved the volume of the sample before encoding with > `sox -v 0.5 floex.wav quiet.wav` and now I can't ABX it succesfully anymore. > So the artifact I heard was just clipping when encoding

>In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >YOu''re not doing any other sort of Ingress filters are you?? No >I dont care about destination port. That line was commented. BUT, incoming transfers are being shaped for some reason. >Could this be shaping on the ISP side?? What >happens when the tc rules >are shut off?? No, everything works fine

I followed Part 1, Part 3, and Part 4 at this url https://www.tecmint.com/install-samba4-active-directory-ubuntu/ Domain Controller is Fedora 29 with samba-dc-4.9.6-0 installed, the other Windows 10 Pro version 1809 with RSAT installed. The Domain Controller is named dcprimary. I am connected to the domain from the Windows named wks2. In part 4 it steps through configuring a logon banner.

Hello everyone, I just found very strange problem. I have a big class with 5500 KBit bandwidth, and a lot of smaller for which this one is their parent. Some of them are with rate 64 and ceil 1024 and other are with rate 256 and ceil pceil (5500). All filters are using mark from iptables. The strange thing is that noone can get more of about 60% of its ceil even if the parent class is almost

Hi Having a problem trying to figure out how to shape local services running on the debian box (asterisk, squid etc) as currently the voice only seems to be getting shaped one way when making external calls. For example I have the rules below (these are the matching rules only not the actual policy rules): #Create Chain for local traffic (outbound) /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A match-all -m

Hi, I'm having some weird problem with the setup of the QoS on a bridged network. As the docs states, outbound/inbound average speed should be expressed in KBps (KBytes per second) but in order to get a maximum speed of 10Mbps (megabits per second) surprising enough I have to use 2560 on the guest (not 1280 as expected). Using 1280 units I get a speed og 5Mbps. I'm aware of peak and

Hello, I'm having one strange issue with latest stable Samba 4.0.4. I'm testing it as a domain controller for two virtual machines. The Samba AD DC is Debian stable, with two domain members - Windows XP Pro and trial Windows 8 Enterprise. User configuration using GPOs is working as expected. However, Computer configuration is never applied properly. Event logs show this entry: ------

B. Mitchell Loebel a ?crit : > Thank you. You're right ... my error ... I meant to say 12 bytes > (including the 2 bytes for VAD). And it is 10ms/frame. No matter ... > thank you for the SPEEX specs. In terms of quality, what SPEEX bit rate > compares with G.729 at 8kbps data rate please? Haven't done formal testing and it depends on whether it's G.729 or G.729A. I'd

Hi, I'm having some weird problem with the setup of the QoS on a bridged network. As the docs states, outbound/inbound average speed should be expressed in KBps (KBytes per second) but in order to get a maximum speed of 10Mbps (megabits per second) surprising enough I have to use 2560 on the guest (not 1280 as expected). Using 1280 units I get a speed og 5Mbps. I'm aware of peak and

First let me say that I was absolutely astounded at the sound quality when using oggenc at q = -1 (around 50 kbps). So much so, that I'm anxious to try some of the lower bit rates that were mentioned in the announcement for 1.0: ... audio and music at fixed and variable bitrates from 16 to 128 kbps/channel. But I am having trouble finding how to use either oggdrop or oggenc to get these

On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:43:52 -0200, ZONA <carlos@zonacharrua.com> wrote: > Hi folks: > > this is my second question at this list and I wanted to mention that with > answers and guides I got from 2 persons last time, I got a quite low rate > stream in vorbis ogg, in about 5 minutes after reading what you wrote- > Thanks! > Well after that, I pointed my attention to the so

Hi, I've been testing out the speex narrowband codec at low data rates (using linphone and Counterpath's Eyebeam). I'm finding that at data rates of ~25 kbps, the quality of the voice call is very poor. I know speex is supposed to work at much lower data rates (~2 kbps). Has anyone verified that speex will produce reasonable quality at low data rates? Are there any existing

Let's say you have a 256 Kbps Internet connection and you're using it for voice calls. With mu-law (G.711), each call uses about 80 kbps, so you really can't have more than 3 calls active at one time. Does Asterisk support any kind of Call Admission Control where it would prevent you from originating a call if it would exceed your Internet bandwidth? For example, in this case, ideally,