similar to: Bandwidth shaping per users with pam_auth

Anybody knows about one bandwidth meter to use in Bering. This is a script i built, it''s works wel, but it''s not very nice!!! =P #!/bin/bash # Bandwidth Monitor device=eth0 bytes=`grep $device /proc/net/dev | cut -f 2 -d : | cut -d '' '' -f 2` kbytes=`expr $bytes / 1024` actual=$kbytes i=1 x=0 total=0 while [ $i -le 2 ] do x=`expr $x + 1`

Hi: Anybody have the iptables line to match ack? iptables -t mangle -A QoS_Test -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK ACK -m length --length :128 I try this but it''s not working for me. Best regards. Sebastián A. Aresca

I''m admin of 50 clients. Sometimes I upgrading my internet traffic shaping script. I think rules of inetrnet traffic shaping is very important thing! I would like to ask some help from people, who understand something about SQUID ZPH and TC, to aim beter internet traffic shaping scripts. Squid has ZPH suport, becouse its responds to such commands as: zph_tos_local 8 zph_tos_peer 0

Hello, Sorry for the many Ccs, but I hope to reach all parties involved. I want to do traffic shaping with NAT and I wanted to do it with IFB instead of IMQ [1]. I tried a lot of things but now I am stuck (and maybe confused). The setup: eth0 eth1 WAN/(Internet) <-> Linux Router <-> LAN Linux router: - does NAT for the LANs - runs local processes

I''m trying to set up a shaper that can shape the inbound traffic to around 40 subnets, that hang on 3 different interfaces of the router. As Linux can''t do ingress shaping I''m left with having to set up 3 seperate shapers, one for each internal interface. This is not completely optimal as I''ll have to limit each of the 3 interfaces to 1/3 of the total

hi list, i''m about to setup traffic shaping on a server and got some small questions about the setup. i read alot of docs/howto''s but there are still some questions i''d like to ask. setup on the box is: - external if is ppp0 (dsl) - internal if in eth0 (with ~15 nat''ed boxes) - openvpn at tun1 since all ppl on the lan feel like they have to use p2p i decided

Hello people, This the first time i post in list. I read the lartc how-to and decided that IMQ with HTB was the solution to solve my problem. The ingress shaping i want is simple, shape the traffic to my ftp-server, i just want to give 8kbps to each client because they only upload to my ftp-server, and i dont want to any class borrowing, each client only send(upload) at 8kbps, not above this

Hello, I have a linux box sitting between (and bridging/firewalling) 2 LAN segments. I''m using Bridge/Netfilter/IMQ/tc(htb) to control (shape) mail/web traffic that traverses the 2 networks. The networks also have some VLAN tagged traffic flying around. My linux box behaves OK with VLAN traffic except that the shaping doesn''t seem to work. Normal http shapes alright but as soon

Hello, I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0). The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given class the sum of incoming and outgoing traffic is specified? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is the line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit familiar

helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth: we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that the borrowing method on one device by itself, e.g. ppp0, alone using HTB or the like. this means that i have to create for another device, e.g. ppp1,

hi all, i have tried out both IMQ and shaping transmit on 2 NICS downstream and upstream respectively, which method is preferred in terms of accuracy, stability etc pls advise tc _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello, I''m being confrunted with the following situation and I''m trying to find the simplest solution possible as to also be easier to manage. 1) I have: ISP1 ------ S1 (linux) S1''s got: 512kbits external bandwidth from ISP1 20Mbits MAN bandwidth not including ISP2 17Mbit tunnel connection which provider : 1 Mbit external bandwidth and 16Mbit MAN bandwidth with

Hi Guys, Here is a question that is probably of concern to many of us. I am under pressure to provide some solution for ingress traffic shaping. What my customer demands is to divide the downstream (ingress) of an ADSL lines to two classes of traffic - important traffic and non important downloads. He has a very reasonable requirement: he wants a guarantee of at least 1000kbps at all times for

Hello Is it possible to shape incoming traffic for local linux users ? Iptables can mark packets created from certain pid/uid/gid. Is there a way to do the same for packets _destined_ for some pid/uid/gid so that I can later shape them with IMQ ? Thanks in advance Dimitris Kotsonis _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given client the *sum* of incoming and outgoing traffic is somehow defined? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is your line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit

Hi folks, I have the traffic shaping (HTB and IMQ) on my eth0 (of course no problems with it). And now I would like add some extra IPs on it ( ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So do I have to set up a new tc rools ( tc qdisc add dev eth0:0 root handle 1: htb default 20 r2q 5 ...) for the eth0:0 and eth0:1 or can still be only tc rules for the eth0? Thanks

Hi, I''ve a router configuration with a dsl connection and two ethernet NICs. How can I control the traffic of the dsl connection when then destination of the traffic can go out of the router using two diferent interfaces? ppp -- router --- lan | DMZ I''ve read that the solution could be IMQ, but i prefer to not to patch kernel and iptables. Any

Dear all My current setup is the following: Normal Hosts --------+ eth0 eth1 | +----------+ +-<->| F/W box |--<-> Internet | +----------+ High priority hosts--+ My eth0 is a normal 100MBps LAN and my Internet connection is a 1Mbps ADSL line. What I want to achieve is to have normal hosts to share a big