similar to: iproute2-2.2.4

Hello all, this is my first post here. Sorry for my english. Gentoo LAN router, 2.4.26-hardened-r2 There are 2 WAN links, one LAN link. I am doing some iptables/routing/tc magic in my scripts. What''s interesting is marking packets traveling from all IP''s in LAN. Interesting commands are: ------------- for ip in `seq 50`; do $IPTABLES -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth2 -d

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

Dear all, I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here have done exactly what i want. Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my eth1 is not restrciting total bandwidth at 100kbps. According to search on google imq is the solution.

Hi folks. Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network using HTB. I have 2 clients: PC1: 192.168.100.2 PC2: 192.168.100.3 Server: 192.168.100.1 This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet. It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has

Hi All, Does anyone know of a way to limit the speed of *individual* TCP sessions, but without placing any overall bandwidth limits, and without requiring an explicit QoS entry for every ip address the machine is communicating with ? The scenario is a mailserver - say you want to limit individual TCP sessions (pop3, smtp etc) to no more than 512Kbit so that an individual session

What I need to do: shape every user on my LAN to 256Kbit -- class for web trafiic with rate X ceil 256Kbit -- class for other(p2p) traffic with rate 1Kbit ceil 200Kbit This is good because even if they have p2p programs running they will always have fast web surfing. I can do it with bash scripts - one class per ip with 2 children. But I wonder if something like this would work: # class

Correct me if I''m wrong, I just want to help my friend who needs a tc solution with fairness to hosts on a 512K/s DSL line, but few of them should be restricted to 64K/s I thought about htb + esfq (sfq with ip based fairness, not connection) parent class with CEIL=500Kbit (no RULE? see *1) and attached esfq to this parent class, now child class with CEIL=64Kbit and RULE=10.0.0.1

Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and 1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2) [general] priorityjumping=yes With n+101: exten => 1337,1,Dial(SIP/zytek,5,Ttj) exten => 1337,102,Dial(SIP/zytek,${RINGTIME},${OPTIONS}) exten => 1337,n,Hangup -- Executing [1337 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/113-087a3000", "SIP/zytek|5|Ttj") in new stack -- Called zytek

Asterisk 1.4.6 at FreeBSD6.2-RELEASE Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. Is this normal behaviour? How to change this? Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial. -- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-08737000",

Me again, another problem. As I said before, I have 2 lines going into "incoming" context. When client calls, I press Flash, client hears music on hold (only on voip line as said in previous post), when I get back and press Flash again to get back to my client I cannon hear him, but he hears me without problems. I have just tested in on the LAN, same situations, happens everytime.

Dnia 2004-10-01 07:11, U¿ytkownik lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl napisa³: >Send LARTC mailing list submissions to > lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc >or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to > lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl > >You can

asterisk-1.4.7, Fedora 7, intel emt64 - nocona: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/alsa.conf': Found ALSA lib pcm_dsnoop.c:558:(snd_pcm_dsnoop_open) unable to open slave [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:365 alsa_card_init: snd_pcm_open failed: No such file or directory [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:481 soundcard_init: Problem opening alsa I/O devices == No sound

Hi, I've recently upgraded Asterisk to the latest version 1.4.9 on a PBX that manages several queues, but at least on one queue strategy (leastrecent) it doesn't seem to be distributing the calls has it should. I think this strategy should work like this: a) Make a list of available agents and their idle time (time since last call) and

Hi, All, I have a question about agents and queues. Right now we have about 4 queues in our system. Some agents are in multiple queues. Our main queue is for technical support and it's by far our busiest queue as well. We have the autologoff feature set to 14 sec right now in the agents.conf file. The problem I'm running into is we don't want people in our sales queue (who are

Hello, Just wondering, from what I have been reading, would using the word bounded solve my problem? I have not actually tried using bounded yet, I will asap, however from what I understand it only applies to classes? I simply have 2 cbq files, cbq-1200.internal, and cbq-1200.external, both of which are identical except one says eth1 instead of eth0. Within each file I have :

Hi All , My first message and I have a little problem with my FC6 box trying to block emule traffic using layer7 . Here my network : Internet --------- ADSL Router ------------------- FC6 Box -------------------- Emule Box external ADSL : Dynamic Internal ADSL : 192.168.254.1 external FC6 : 192.168.254.3 internal FC6 : 192.168.253.1 Emule Box : 192.168.253.3 I guess that everything

I am using the script below to simulate a very low bandwidth connection. I found that I could turn the bandwidth knob down to about 4kbit, but below that I didn''t get any traffic through. I''ve had a look at this generally, but couldn''t find an answer. It doesn''t even seem like the first reply packet gets through. I have tried it with much bigger buffers,

Hello Everybody, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit using HTB. Below that I get report to change r2q. I want to bring down the Leaf class Bandwidth to 3kbit. My script is as below: Tc Script to throttle down the Bandwidth to 8kbit based on MAC address and IP address tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 30 r2q 1 tc class add

Hi, I am using eclipse and instant rails. I am trying to start the backgroundrb server by the folowing script ruby script/backgroundrb start On doing a stack trace, it shows me an error in backgroundrb_tasks.rb on the line if File.exists?(scripts_src) `#{scripts_src}/start -d` Can anyone tell me what could be the possible reason? I tried removing -d, but no use. Thanks, Harini