similar to: two links to default gw

Hello Summary: I have ifplugd managing eth0 and wlan0 (both dhcp). When I plug in the cat5 (which brings up eth0) applications which have already bound to wlan0 stop working, obviously because wlan0 for some reason is unable to get non-local packets out that interface. I figured if poodoze is able to have both interfaces working, then linux must surely be able to do it as well. The

Hi, Problem: I want 2 vpn tunnels for 2 subnets over one interface ipsec0. Documentation only describes config for 1 vpn or road warriors. I defined 2 vpn zones ''fre'' and ''swe''. #ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS net Net Internet zone loc Local Local fre VPN_Fre VPN Fre swe VPN_Swe VPN Swe Interface ipsec0 is tunnel over eth1. Local is eth0. ipsec0 serves 2 zones: fre

Hi everyone. I am so baffled by the following problem: Office 1 is using ADSL and it is building a VPN tunnel with IPSEC to Office 2. Both ends are using shorewall/freeswan firewalls. Diagram: Office1 fw --- VPN TUNNEL --- Office2 fw --- cisco router ----- VLANS | DMZ Office 1 has the following interfaces: 2: eth0:

Hello Gurus, I am a small problem with routing and here are the details. Interfaces on my server: * ipsec0 - 172.19.58.94 * tunl0 - 172.19.58.94 * eth0 - 172.19.58.94 Now, the problem is that there is another host 172.19.58.200. All communication to 172.19.58.200 should be through tunl0, and all the data should be secured using IPSec (tunnel mode - because there are more machines on my

Hello, I have the AR9285 wireless adaptor on an HP DV6-2128ca notebook. I can see it. it comes up in NetworkManager but never gets an IP. the router is a linksys using WPA/PSK security. Would/could someone please help me out trying to get this to work? Output of several commands follows: dmesg: ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x69 ath: EEPROM indicates we should expect a direct regpair map ath:

Hi, still trying to understand one thing. I would definitely like to tell iptables to accept all packets coming from remote vpn only if they hit the $VIRTUALVPNINTERFACE. I tried -o ipsec0 but this is not working, looks like ipsec0 device doesn't exist or it is not recognized. I red on the Openswan users list, that Linux kernel 2.6 native ipsec don't create ipsec* interface (if I am

------------------ ---------| external ip eth0 | ---------- -------------------------- | |--------------------------- | -------| Internal IP eth1 | -------------------------- | |-------------------------- ---------| external Ip eth2 | ---------- -------------------------- i want to put web and ftp traffic

------------------ ---------| external ip eth0 | ---------- -------------------------- | |--------------------------- | -------| Internal IP eth1 | -------------------------- | |-------------------------- ---------| external Ip eth2 | ---------- -------------------------- i want to put web and ftp traffic to

Hello all, I am working with kernel 2.2.20 with the necessary options configured into the kernel to support all of the wonderfully fancy routing features: - routing based on ToS - routing based on fwmark - multiple routing tables This same kernel is in use elsewhere, and is routing based on fwmark with success. This leads me to believe that my kernel is OK and that I have another

Hello Tom, I have successfully configured proxy arp subnettinng on my network with three hosts in a Dmz. And it works great. (using proxyarp in interfaces) I also tryed this on network below same trouble. However for this network below I have tryed to configure one host in a Dmz (using /etc/shorewall/proxyarp) which works and comes up after I set it up and clear Isp''s arp

Hi all, Long email but please be patient :) I am part of EHAS [1], a non profit organization which main goal is to improve the Healthcare assistance in isolated rural areas in developing countries. Recently we have developed a long distance Wi-Fi network in Cuzco (Peru). This network provides connectivity to 12 nodes (they are in fact Health Centers). As VoIP is a essential service in this

I am attempting to create an ipsec tunnel between two CentOS 5.1 systems, network-to-network with two different 192.168.xxx.0/24 LAN segments. I have gone through the documentation on the centos web site, and have the machines to the point where the /var/log/messages show ``IPsec-SA established'' on both machines after runnig ``ifup ipsec0'' (same ipsec0 on each machine). IP

I have a system that does *not* have a graphical desktop installed, nor do I ever plan to. I have its wired ethernet working just peachy. Now I want to configure a USB wireless ethernet and scratching my head. Particularly since I don't use NetworkManager, everything is manually configured. That said, if I enable NM, I see this in /var/log/messages: NetworkManager[26900]: <info>

I have an Everex laptop (ick, but it was super cheap) that has an Atheros wireless NIC in it, but I can't seem to get it to connect to my wireless in-home LAN. Here's what I've done so far (that isn't working) - any suggestions? [root at marktop mark]# lspci | grep Ether 00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 7c) 05:01.0 Ethernet controller:

I just got the list confirmation and noticed it''s text only email so here it is again in plain text. Below is the oringal message. Hi all, I am really struggling with this one, I have built a lot of linux machines using IPSEC tunnels and shorewall gateways. I decied to build a new test machine with Debian running 2.4.25 and Shorewall 2.0.15. I have two subnets on their own switches and

Hello all, I'm trying to bridge the wlan0 and eth0 on an embedded system. I used the following commands to setup the bridge: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous ifconfig wlan0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 wlan0 brctl sethello br0 1 brctl setmaxage br0 4 brctl setfd br0 4 ifconfig br0 up The eth0 is connected to a local network, and wlan0 is set to

The version of Shorewall in the CVS development tree contains the first implementation of dynamic zones. While these zones are aimed at IPSEC Road Warriors, there is nothing ipsec-specific in the implementation except for a small extension in the tunnels file. There are two new commands: add and delete shorewall {add|delete} <interface>[:<host or subnet>] zone The interface

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m trying to setup a central IPSEC-Gateway with several ipsec tunnels. Some are to be routed over one leased line, some over the other leased line. Both leased lines have their own public ip adress. The setup looks kinda like this: eth1(ipsec0)--ISP0--Internet--eth1-Linux1-eth0--Subnet1 /

Hopefully this is a simple answer. I am new to setting up bridges on a linux system. Here is what I have set up: Laptop directly connected to the eth0 port on the bridge (A Soekris 4521 board). The otherside of the bridge is a wirelass lan card (SMC2532b-w) as wlan0. The wlan0 is setup in managed mode to communicate to my test ap2000. When I do a 'brctl showmacs br0' on the

Hi, my box is connected to 3 networks, eth0 eth1 wlan0. I want "my" traffic to go via wlan0 and everything from eth1 NATed to eth0: eth0 192.168.1.10/24 eth1 172.16.1.1/12 wlan0 192.168.10.190/24 I first tried this with two single hosts: iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o eth0 -t nat iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o wlan0 -t nat echo 200 Forw >>