similar to: Suggestion.

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

Hi, I wished to shape the traffic that cross my ppp0 interface so I asked around and google''d a bit and I headed in the LARTC HOWTO. As stated in the early in the text, as the title implies, that is an "Advanced" HOWTO and while by no means rocket science, some prior knowledge is assumed. Unfortunately I found myself lost very soon and I''m writing here in hope

Dear All, I want to use Traffic shaping /control feature but my linux is SuSE 8.1, the kernel don''t have HTP packet scheduler. So how can I use this feature? Thanks for answer. Le Van

hello, i have a 5500 iPaq with familiar 0.8.2 on it and i don''t know how to install a traffic shaper tool on it. I installed iproute2 package i found on familiar site and for that i have the tc and ip commands, but when trying to add a qdisc, as a dummy example, i get the next answer: > tc qdisc add dev wlan0 root cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 100 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

Dear list, I have experimented some time now with HTB queues, and have received a lot of help from this list, especially from Stef. Thank you. My currect Shaper looks like this: http://www.designobjekt.de/test/rc.trafficshaper Unfortunately I still experience lags of this type: -players from the internet playing on my server feel lags -I feel lags when I play on a different server on the

Hi! Is there any way to do just plain vanilla TBF (Token Buck Filter) type shaping on a group of ips/networks, not an entire interface. Currently the only way I know how to shape in Linux is to use HTB or CBQ, but both of these need a total rate and then you need to subdivide that into classes. That is not what I want. All I want is Cisco generic traffic shaping style shaping (or similar to how

now, i''m learning and try to read a lot of article about tc command in linux for setting traffic shaper. but i''m doubt about In the theory about tc command ... In general, we define class under root qdisc but Is it can be possible ???? If we define another qdisc under root qdisc, Can i do it? because i have just read tc command syntax and i found this point ... syntax: tc qdisc

While I''m thinking about that review of howto changes, here are a few other responses about things I don''t believe. I''ll be interested in more info if anyone has any. ==== [from new doc] Besides being classful, CBQ is also a shaper and it is in that aspect that it really doesn''t work very well. It should work like this. I''ve not noticed that it

Hello! I need assistance to solve my problem related to traffic shaping based on the user ids. The problem: each unix user (of the linux host) has to be limited with incoming channel (internet) bandwidth. I need this to implement internet access solution based on ltsp (http://www.ltsp.org). As far as I know the best way to shape traffic in linux is CBQ. But there is no filter based on unix

Hi all. Im using the following CQB shaper to shape IP addresses: DEV=eth1 (internal eth) tc qdisc del dev $DEV root tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 256kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:2 cbq rate 512kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev

Hi Stef, Reffering to page < http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/7.html > I found a para as follows, " CBQ is not always as accurate as it should be. See docum.org on the test page for some tests with bounded classes. The algorithm used by cbq is very "link sensitive". It calculates the link idle time and for that it needs the real link bandwidth, average

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

Hello, I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion of the script (the whole script shapes several

Hi. I''m trying to get a traffic shaper like this: ------ VoIP pkts --> | |_| ------ \ | ---O -> ------ / Data pkts --> | ------ In this shaper voip packets are in a different queue than any other kind of packet. I want a data packet to be

Hi all, After posting some emails here and googling in the net. I have now a little clarity where and how to start bandwidth Management. Hope I can still be guided though. My understanding is I will be needing these modules and linux utilities. I hope someone can confirm. 1. I need to use iptables/ebtables for packet marking. 2. I can use tc for packet shaping. 3. I can use bwm_ng for

at 1 Jul 2005, I request help about HTB setting because my HTB setting did not work. After days, I found the source code bug lead to problem. My linux kernel is v2.4.17 port for mips by boardcom. boardcom set HZ to 200 in linux/include/asm-mips/param.h. In linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h, SCHED_JSCALE is set to 0 according to HZ=200. When I set SCHED_JSCALE to 13, the problem is solved. Shun

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi there, what''s difference between wonder shaper and htb/tc? http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ please advice. regards, /vicky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBfuS9pbZvCIJx1bcRAl27AKCldJljOgC89SPKAmPMM4Vwitc3IACdFS3s

Hi All , My first message and I have a little problem with my FC6 box trying to block emule traffic using layer7 . Here my network : Internet --------- ADSL Router ------------------- FC6 Box -------------------- Emule Box external ADSL : Dynamic Internal ADSL : 192.168.254.1 external FC6 : 192.168.254.3 internal FC6 : 192.168.253.1 Emule Box : 192.168.253.3 I guess that everything

Group, I am reading about tc (traffic control) and willing to get my feet wet. As requirement, there should be HTB compiled in the kernel. I grabbed a Mandrake 8.2 distro, and didn''t installed the kernel source. Anyone knows if the HTB is compiled in Mandrake 8.2, or point a way to find that out? I tried to read the /usr/src/kernel.xxxxx/.config file, but it doesn''t exists.

Hi All, I found 2 unusual behavior with u32 classifier in Kernel 2.4.12. I’ve u32 compiled as module. 1> u32 filter seems not working if there is already some fw filter used for some other class. In order to get u32 working I’ve to delete root class, which in terms delete all fw filters too, and then same command for u32 works. fw is also compiled as module. 2> If I add u32 filter to my