similar to: Default gateway with multiple routing tables

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Default gateway with multiple routing tables"

2004 Apr 07
1
setup fail-over with redhat9...
Hi. Im now decribeing my problem very clearly to see if anyone could help me. I have 3 (three) nics in my system. 1 is for my internet network - (eth1) 2 are for my 2 adsl lines that i use to connect to the internet (eth2 is my "master" adsl line) and (eth0 is my "slave" adsl line). I know that to make redundance work ill have to setup the ip route and ip rule in my
2004 Oct 12
0
Not work fine, Two Internet links
Hi! sorry my english (soy de Argentina) This is my scene: ISP 1: IP X.X.X.7/28, GW X.X.X.1 ISP 2: IP X.X.X.22/30, GW X.X.X.21 LINUX SERVER: eth0, ISP 1 (default) eth1, to intranet 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.6.0/24, 192.168.50.0/24 (aliasing) eth2, to intranet 192.168.8.0/24, 192.168.9.0/24 eth3, to intranet 192.168.0.0/24 eth4, ISP 2 eth5, to intranet 192.168.11.0/24, 192.168.12.0/24 I need two
2013 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
Sriram, The problem is that you want to unroll/vectorize many loops with non-constant loop count - it is a trade-off of which case you estimate as more likely. int foo(int *ptr, int n) { for ( .. i <n) ptr[i] = ... } The question is: is it more likely to have “n” such that unrolling is beneficial or not. Now, you could probably write an analysis that bounds the loop count (for the
2004 Sep 15
0
Load balancing and routing tables
Dear all, First please excuse me for my very bad english. I''m curently setting up a gateway (linux 2.6.7) with load balancing ( multipath ). I access them from lan and my external interfaces are NATed. I''m used iproute2 as described in the LARTC and nano howto. My problem is that connections are well balanced but often, long connection are break because the default route
2004 Aug 06
1
MuSE 0.9 codename &quot;COTURNIX&quot; - out now with new major features!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <p><p>re all! about the running question (as i read on the http://icecast.org website in the 3rd party software section) if MuSE is working with icecast2, here is the answer: it definitely does :) the problem was fixed a couple of months ago in the CVS code, now we have a new stable release which will get hopefully soon properly packaged
2004 Dec 16
0
MuSE 0.9.1 codename STREAMTIME
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 annunciazio' annunciazio'! dyne.org autoproduzioni & the FreakNet Medialab proudly present: __ __ ____ _____ ___ ___ _ | \/ |_ _/ ___|| ____| / _ \ / _ \ / | | |\/| | | | \___ \| _| | | | | (_) || | | | | | |_| |___) | |___ | |_|
2004 Dec 16
0
MuSE 0.9.1 codename STREAMTIME
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 annunciazio' annunciazio'! dyne.org autoproduzioni & the FreakNet Medialab proudly present: __ __ ____ _____ ___ ___ _ | \/ |_ _/ ___|| ____| / _ \ / _ \ / | | |\/| | | | \___ \| _| | | | | (_) || | | | | | |_| |___) | |___ | |_|
2013 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
Hi Nadav, Thanks for the response. I forgot to mention that there is an upper limit of 16 for the Trip Count check, TinyTripCountVectorThreshold = 16; if (TC > 0u && TC < TinyTripCountVectorThreshold). So right now, any loop with Trip Count as 0, or with value >=16, LV with unroll. With the change to the lower bound, it will also include the loop with 0 trip count. SCEV returns 0
2007 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Stack switching, Active Objects and LLVM
[Apologies. This is a repost because the earlier post didn't have a subject heading and might have been missed by members] Hello, I wish to have lots of little stacks and be able to switch rapidly between them. I could do CPS transformation but don't like the overhead of creating gc'able continuation thunks and the copying from stack to heap. I'd like to explore a no-copy
2013 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
Hi Sriram, Thanks for performing this analysis. The problem here, both for memcpy and the vectorizer, is that we can’t predict the size of “n”, even though the only use of ’n’ is for the loop bound for the alloca [4 x [8 x i32]]. If you change the unroll condition to TC >= 0 then you will disable loop unrolling for all loops because getSmallConstantTripCount returns an unsigned number. You
2013 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] Improving the usability of LNT
Wow, that sounds great! Thanks for working on this, and yes, please, send the patches! --renato On 30 April 2013 16:23, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel,**** > > I made some changes to the LNT perf reporting tool to make it more user > friendly by adding some features:**** > > **1. **Make the sidebar and the navigation bar stationary,
2013 Feb 01
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch][Review Requested][Compilation Time] Avoid frequent copy of elements in LoopStrengthReduce
Sriram, This patch looks good. Please commit. ...and thanks for the data. -Andy On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:59 PM, "Murali, Sriram" <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Hello, > This patch aims to improve compile time performance by increasing the SCEV vector size in LoopStrengthReduce. It is observed that the BaseRegs vector size is 4 in most cases, and elements are
2013 Jan 30
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch][Review Requested][Compilation Time] Avoid frequent copy of elements in LoopStrengthReduce
The compilation time is measured for different benchmarks while compiling a .bc file into a shared object. The improvement across the range of benchmarks is listed in following table. If the reason behind the need for other performance metrics is to identify possible measurement errors, then I think this table would be of some help. However, we do not have the standard deviation and confidence
2012 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] Disabling x87 instructions for a sub-target
Hi Sriram, I'm not sure if I understand your question correctly: Do you need to generate code that contains no x87 floating-point instructions altogether, but uses calls into a soft-float library instead? That behaviour can be enabled using the "-soft-float" flag, as far as I know. Or is it only about the fcomi* instructions, which are not supported by pre-Pentium Pro chips? Then I
2002 Dec 03
1
rsync 2.5.5 port to Novell NetWare
Hullo, all. I diligently consulted the suggested reading on the way in: > Welcome to the rsync@lists.samba.org mailing list! PLEASE READ THIS > IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: > http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html 'Twas a quick read, given that I'm the co-author. ;-> I recently received an odd inquiry from someone I didn't know at all,
2004 Aug 06
1
MuSe problem
I cannot connect MuSe (using line in) to my icecast server. I get thoses messages repeting : Internal buffer inconsistency. flushbits <> ResvSizebit reservoir error: l3_side->main_data_begin: 1640 Resvoir size: 1792 resv drain (post) 5 resv drain (pre) 0 header and sideinfo: 120 data bits: 679 total bits: 804
2004 Aug 06
0
Radio Station
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 07:42:52PM -0700, cloper wrote: > The reason I ask about the sound card is because i tried a few, like > muse, and it wanted a /dev/dsp which i could not get working properly. Hi cloper, did you tried with muse -o ? that deactivates usage of the soundcard. anyway, if /dev/dsp is not present, muse runs anyway.
2009 Jun 20
1
Fw: RE:Nagios under *[solved]
Hi Steve Thanks for all your help, i followed your answers and found on that nagios was being run as user nagios....and if i executed the last command it asked for a password [i tried nagios password,root password etc] but it did not work..it the end i opened nagios.cfg and changed the NAGIOS_USER to root and changed the ownership permissons on the script also to root..I now get the correct
2013 Jan 29
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch][Review Requested][Compilation Time] Avoid frequent copy of elements in LoopStrengthReduce
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Our benchmark results show that the compilation time performance improved by > ~0.5%. That's fairly small; what was the standard deviation, confidence interval, etc? -- Sean Silva
2004 Aug 06
0
Liveice or Muse
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <p>On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 08:28:41PM +0100, Thai DANG wrote: > Pardo Juan Fernando wrote: > >Somebody can answer me wich stream is better...Liveice or Muse ? > > I tried MuSe, it works well but : > - the interface is a bit slow when it is streaming (especially for > adding songs dynamically) > - I didn't manage to