similar to: shaping fails when using p2p apps?

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority

Hi, I have been modifying the Wonder shaper to include another queue. My understanding was packets would be de queued to hardware in the following order: cbq1 -> sfq10 > sfq20 > sfq30. Also we only move onto the next queue when the preceding one is empty. However is seems to be prio xx number that reflects the order packets are de queued not to what flowid they belong to. If I

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi, I''m trying to modify the Wondershaper script so achieve the following. 1. Prioritize traffic to the few IP addresses. 2. Everyone else should get a fair amount of bandwidth The problem I am facing is when I run this script is that the bandwidth seems to get halved. I tried to apply this script to a site where the upstream and downstream were fully saturated. I immediately saw

Hi all. Im using the following CQB shaper to shape IP addresses: DEV=eth1 (internal eth) tc qdisc del dev $DEV root tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 256kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:2 cbq rate 512kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev

I''ve been following the HOWTO, and reading mailing list discussions about throttling bandwidth, and have had some success, but I just want to tie off some loose ends. Essentially what I am wanting to do is to keep our bandwidth usage below 1megabit, because if we go over we get charged for that traffic. I''ve used some of the examples from the HOWTO to limit our bandwidth, but I

Hi, I''m having issues with policing my incoming traffic by matching packet marks made by iptables. I''ve checked as many sites and guides as I can find, and I seem to be doing the exact same thing as they all are, but there''s still no success. As such, I was wondering if anyone can have a quick look to see if I''ve done anything obviously stupid? Essentially, I

Hello, I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion of the script (the whole script shapes several

Hi all, I have read the larc howto and I need to apply a traffic shaper with this configuration: router / two interface etho and eth1 lan lan is on eth1 and on eth0 I''ve the dsl connection (1.2 Mbit / 256 kbit) I need to limit the bandwith towards lan and I''ve thought at HTB and tcng. I write the script belove. I want limit the p2p and ftp (ssh and irc) connection at 15

Hi I''m actually using a wondershaper derived script. The problem I have is that when I ping (ping is in high priority queue) the ping time is not as low as I expected with p2p running: 760 packets transmitted, 760 received, 0% packet loss, time 759695ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.667/62.863/598.539/33.287 ms, pipe 2 With voip, it is much better with the qos but it is still a little

Hello, I just found the great howto and started shaping my internet connection. The howto''s last update is a liitle in the past now so I have some questions about how things are done the best way nowadays ;-) To ensure a stable and low latency voip communication I added an HFSC qdisc to device ppp0 (1 Mbit SDSL). There are two classes (by now): One for SIP and RTP and one for the

now i''m read a lot of knowledge paper about traffic control in linux because now i''m try to develop and research about traffic shaper so can everybody tell me about my topic ... Is it can do for real???? my topic is " now, many organization use traffic shaper for control traffic and bandwidth because don''t want something example some mac address, ip address,

Hi! Is there any way to do just plain vanilla TBF (Token Buck Filter) type shaping on a group of ips/networks, not an entire interface. Currently the only way I know how to shape in Linux is to use HTB or CBQ, but both of these need a total rate and then you need to subdivide that into classes. That is not what I want. All I want is Cisco generic traffic shaping style shaping (or similar to how

I have set up wrr successfully on my bridge/shaper machine. That much works fine. I originally used sfq in the inner classes. However, there was a problem with high-bandwidth connections (web downloads, bittorrent) starving low-bandwidth low-latency connections like ssh. I would like to use prio or similar to prioritize the interactive traffic, but it does not seem to work. I have tested with

Hi al.. I just write program that helps to configure tc with HTB and iptables CLASS extension. Its written in perl and uses Apache like config files. Program can be found on http://sourceforge.net/projects/ist-shaper/ or http://www.ingwar.eu.org/ist-shaper/ In few days will be new version with time aware rules. The simply config file looks like this.

Hi, In our product i am using the High Speed Serial driver as the WAN interface. I''ve implemented the HSS as a serial driver and i am running PPP to connect to the internet. I have both Voice data + FTP data going thro the PPP session. Is it possible for me to use the Traffic shaper(wonder shaper) in my case/ Do i need to make the HSS driver to appear as a network device inorder to

For those of you in the US using Comcast as your ISP, you''ll know that they now have a feature called Powerboost available in the regions they serve. Basically, it allows people to have higher-than-rated throughput for the first few minutes of data transfer. After those few minutes, they''re supposed to throttle back down to what their rated line speed is. I''m having

Hello Everyone :), i''m using cbq.init version 7.1 for traffic shaper, the rule did work well with flat rule (without parent/child)..here the condition of my network : - have a DMZ (and i not want the traffic to DMZ be bounded) - i made the CBQ engine also a bridge and i put it before NAT server (so if

Did anyone ever answer this one? THIS is what I am trying to do: >[LARTC] cbq+sfq and DSCP marking >Maria Joana Urbano stmaria@dei.uc.pt >Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:42 +0000 > > * Previous message: [LARTC] Monitoring.... > * Next message: [LARTC] two routes 1 network card > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] >