similar to: [Off-Topic] Call for networking help

Replace uXX by __uXX and _packed by __attribute((packed)) as seems to be the norm for userspace headers. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> --- include/uapi/linux/virtio_scsi.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

Replace uXX by __uXX and _packed by __attribute((packed)) as seems to be the norm for userspace headers. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> --- include/uapi/linux/virtio_scsi.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

virtio 1.0 makes all memory structures LE, so we need APIs to conditionally do a byteswap on BE architectures. To make it easier to check code statically, add virtio specific types for multi-byte integers in memory. Add low level wrappers that do a byteswap conditionally, these will be useful e.g. for vhost. Add high level wrappers that query device endian-ness and act accordingly.

virtio 1.0 makes all memory structures LE, so we need APIs to conditionally do a byteswap on BE architectures. To make it easier to check code statically, add virtio specific types for multi-byte integers in memory. Add low level wrappers that do a byteswap conditionally, these will be useful e.g. for vhost. Add high level wrappers that query device endian-ness and act accordingly.

Have you added the $LLVM_INSTALL_DIR/bin to your PATH environment variable? Regarding changing a particular backend, check the documentation in http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html A few LLVMdev meetings have good talks to give you a good enough idea. http://llvm.org/devmtg/ Cheers, Raghu. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Teklu

Hi all, I have successfully built LLVM itself, as all the tools (llc et al) are working fine. I built the latest release version (2.7). I have been trying to build the llvm-gcc frontend on a sparc machine. I encountered the following issues : 1) During configuration, the default assembler (installed at /usr/ccs/bin) is chosen to be used, but I want to use the GNU assembler (installed at

Hi all, I have started using LLVM recently, and I have a basic question. There are two different ways in which an executable can be generated from a .c file - by just using llvm-gcc, and using a combination of llvm-gcc (to emit bitcode .bc), llc (to emit assembly code), as (to assemble the code) and collect2 (linker). For example, consider compiling test.c : 1) llvm-gcc -O3 test.c -o

Hi I am new to llvm and Linux (I am using ubuntu 10) My aim is to add backend to llvm. I install llvm using $ sudo apt-get install llvm and I am able to understand what I read about Writing an LLVM Compiler Backend. I have seen the assembly codes of the targets on llvm using llc. What I need now is to change some of the TableGen files of one of the target like SparcInstrInfo.td.  So I

Hello, I am using rpart to derive classification rules for customer segments. I have a few categorical variables in the set of independent variables. For instance, Account Size can be (Very-Small, Small, Medium, Large, V-Large) Rpart seems to encode these categories into: a,b,c,d,e The results are expressed in terms of the encoded values. How do I find out what encoding was used by rpart.

On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:23 PMPDT, Raghu Prabhakar wrote: > 1) During configuration, the default assembler (installed at /usr/ccs/bin) is chosen to be used, but I want to use the GNU assembler (installed at /vm/GNU/bin in my machine). In spite of re-arranging paths on the PATH variable, and even after removing /usr/ccs/bin from PATH, configure still chooses the default assembler itself. Is there

Dear camping users, having been contacted by Julian Tarkhanov, I am willing to prepare the next camping release. _why has given me his friendly approval, with the reserve that camping.rb should be lower than 4k. He also told me that he wanted to remove the ActiveSupport and Markaby dependencies. I am writing here to get the users input so that I don''t do any mistake. So far, my plans

Hello all, I am trying to modify the Sparc backend to do something for my team's project, to do the following. Whenever the backend encounters a call to one particular type of function names (functions like p0(), p1()..etc), I want the backend to generate a "sethi %g0, <number>", and NOT a "call p0, call p1..." instruction. However, the backend should work as usual

On 1/20/11 12:27 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: Just out of curiosity, have either of you considered writing an LLVM transform that simply replaces these call instructions with inline assembly code that does what you want? If that works, it seems much simpler than modifying/enhancing the code generator. -- John T. > I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. >

=== 1. Camping on Rack === I''ve just finished rewriting Camping to use Rack in the "core". I got rid of (a little less) than 1kB in camping.rb and removed lots of un-necessary files (lib/server/*.rb, fastcgi.rb & mongrel.rb). bin/camping does now only provide WEBrick, Mongrel and console-support and should only be used in development. It uses Rack::ShowExceptions to catch

I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. 1. Add a new intrinsic function to LLVM that corresponds to "functions with particular type of function names". The steps to create intrinsic function is documented in http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html#intrinsic. 2. Create a lowering pass that lowers "functions with particular type" ( eg. p0, p1) to

Hi, I am looking to develop an assembler for an experimental ISA, to produce elf binaries. Does LLVM use the GNU assembler internally? Or does it have a modular extension/in-memory representation for an assembly-level IR? I am aware of the existence of the lower level SelectionDAG and MachineInstr components. Do we have a similar, but lower level IR abstraction suitable for assembly?

hi i am installing scalix mailserver while installing RPM i am getting this error: Failed dependencies: compat-libstdc++-296 is needed by scalix-server-10.0.1.3-1.fc4.i386 libcrypto.so.5 is needed by scalix-server-10.0.1.3-1.fc4.i386 libgssapi_krb5.so.2(gssapi_krb5_2_MIT) is needed by scalix-server-10.0.1.3-1.fc4.i386 libical >= 0.24.RC4.20050413 is needed

Hi Raghu, > Thanks Duncan. Just to make sure I understand correctly, opt has more global information, due to which optimizations can have greater effect than in llvm-gcc, where optimizations are applied on a per-function basis. Is this correct ? if you look carefully at what "opt -O3" runs (using -debug-pass=Arguments) you will see that it first runs a small list of passes (the

Hi everyone, I've got glusterfs-server/glusterfs-client version 3.4.0final-ubuntu1~precise1 (from the semiosis PPA) running on Ubuntu 13.04. I'm trying to share ZFS (ZFS on Linux 0.6.2-1~precise from the zfs-stable PPA) using GlusterFS. When creating the ZFS filesystem and the Gluster volume, I accepted all the defaults and then: - I enabled deduplication for the ZFS filesystem (zfs set

Hi all, I am Prajwal, a sophomore Undergraduate student from IIT Bombay, India. I want to contribute to Xapian through GSoC 2012. Specifically I am interested in the Weighting Schemes project. I have not yet taken any IR related course, but IR and NLP have always been my academic interests. I want to learn more about these topics, and I think that this is the best opportunity to do so. I