similar to: Can I do this?

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |

Hi guys, I have a question about of route-map with linux, I have two routers linux, one for Internet Trafic and other for VPN traffic, both routers have public IP''s address. Internet with nat VPN with nat eth0 200.244.10.1 eth0 200.244.10.2 ---- ----

I am relatively new to iproute2. Any information on the topic below would save me considerable time. I appreciate any help, thanks. We want to plug two lines into a webserver to increase the bandwidth available to the hosted sites. Rather than use round-robin DNS we would prefer to use iproute2 to use equal cost routing across the two lines. However, I am still not sure how well that will

Hello, i have had a terribe day today, why? because i have been so 4 or 5 hours trying to do work this and i have not finished it. I feel very pleased if anything can help me. I have two isp connections: eth0: dhcp ip1: 82.198.*.* gw1: 82.198.*.* and a router adsl in ip 192.168.0.253: eth1: static ip2: 192.168.0.254 gw1: 192.168.0.253 the same machine has 3 more networks cards but i am

Hi, I am new in LARTC list. I had intermediate skills in networking. What I tried to do: Use 2 links with loadsharing + falt toletant (to add bandwitdh) ok ! I am use Debian Etch in router/fw With kernel debian default + routes-2.6.17-12.diff patch The Problem: The iproute2 just route thought the last gateway of nexthop rule. I was running tcpdump in 2 terminals, tcpdump -nni eth0 ...

I''m using Debian (sarge) I do now have 2 ISP, one DSL and one cabel. I want to use the DSL as my primary and only use the cabel-modem if the DSL fails. The setup is: IP1 -> Router -> NAT_IP1 -> eth0 -> eth2 (LAN) IP2 -> Cable-Modem -> eth1 -> eth2 (LAN) I wrote the following in my /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add from NAT_IP1 lookup 1 ip route add

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors:

Hi All, I am hoping someone can help me with a project I am doing at work. I warn you in advance that this will be a long post, but I wanted to provide as much information as I could to explain what was going on. Any help would be very much appreciated and welcomed as my boss would like to see this up and running this week. I have been scouring various documents on advanced routing for a

Dear all, I am having problem using iproute2 on my new Slackware 10.1 box. Here goes the problem: root@localhost:~# echo "200 DOONET" >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables root@localhost:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables # # reserved values # 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec # # local # #1 inr.ruhep 200 DOONET root@localhost:~# ip rule add from 10.255.255.0/24

Hello, I have tested a simple thing in two version of Linux and there was a problem when I have used fwmark as a selector for rule lookups. As you can see below on the Slack, the <test> table doesn''t have any label about fwmark. Is there an iproute problem? -------------------------------------- # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) # uname -r 2.6.5-1.358 #

Hi, I''ve setup a gateway using multiple default gateways and netfilter MASQUERADE to load balance traffic between two DSL interfaces and one dedicated link, and when I try to download something big, or when I''m using MSN (both in clients under this gateway), sometimes, or most times, after a while the connection timeouts. The connection doesn''t seem to change its

Hello, I have a routing configuration that I''ve been working on and seems to be working well for me. I''d like to ask for some peer review. If your interested and can take a moment to consider this I could use some advice on if this correct. I''m still very much learning, sorry if this email is off topic or too long or anything. I want to route a wireless network

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

many many thanks for ur help ok i m making my problem more clear... my LAN ip is :172.16.100.0/24 ip of eth1 is :202.51.78.122 and this is fixed and permanent address and it has no netmask and gateway(so, to provide internet to my LAN i have used the ppp0 for this connection ) ip of eth2 : 203.78.165.154; netmask:255.255.255.248; gateway:203.78.165.153 for eth0 my

Hello, for the past couple of days i''ve been banging my head against a wall trying to get this iproute2 issue resolved. the basic scenario is as follows. eth0 - external ip eth1 - internal ip i''m forwarding an external ip to the internal interface at a port that''s responding. i can connect to the internal ip just fine. %telnet 10.x.x.x 25 Trying 10.x.x.x...

Hi, I''ve just setup my first Linux router and have run into a problem with the from source prefix when using `ip rule`. If I set a from source prefix in my ip rules the two networks can see each other but the Linux router itself can only ping 1 network. /etc/iproute2/rt_tables 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec 1 inr.ruhep 100 implan 200 inet

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "wf" == lartc-request <lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl> writes: wf> The ip route how-to describes the following for setting up wf> source routing wf> #echo 501 uras.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables wf> Error: argument "uras.out" is wrong: invalid table ID I''m

Hi. The task: 1. There 3 servers and a router with 2 PPPoE connections (let call them: ppp0, ppp1). 2. There are several groups of Inet-clients to be served (Servers, Clients and Club). 3. The task is: - to route Club through the ppp1; - to Servers and Clients through ppp0; (Next is reproduced from memory and may be slightly incorrect) router # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table

I have dealt with machines that have multiple network cards in them before, but never when they were on the same subnet so this issue has never come up before. My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I started out using dhcp and found that if I went through the dhcp song-and-dance then that address became active and the other one was disabled, and vice versa. On our local