similar to: Help! VLAN tagged traffic not shaping :-(

Hello At first I must tell you that I´m a real newbie with Linux (and english as well...) I´m using 2 vlans and shaping works quite well without vlan Now I want to do load balancing at these vlans. Any vlan should get the same minimum/maximum bandwidth of download and use the bandwidth that isn´t used by the other one at the moment. But with vlan the shaping doesn´t work. Can you please tell me

Hello, I use HTB with linux-2.4.20-ac1 and iptables-1.2.7a (pathced for IMQ). I configured one HTB qdisc on an IMQ device. This qdisc has some classes (about 5) and all of the classes has qdisc pfifo. I sometimes got out from my linux (while I was working) and I found in logs: Dec 4 11:49:27 core kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 Dec 4 11:49:28 core kernel: HTB: quantum of class

Hello I have few questions regarding tc functionality (qdiscs, classes, etc.) when vlans are in use. For example, consider interface eth0, for which I create and extra vlan with vconfig, let''s say eth0.11. Then using tc I can add usual things - qdiscs, filters, ... - to both eth0 and eth0.11. The questions are: - on which interface - virtual or real, should I actually use tc ? Or

I''m looking for a way to shape all traffic on a virtual vlan interface, say eth1.100 to a max of 100mbit. The box is a quagga router with eth0 on the inside and vlan interfaces on the eth1 card to our upstream partners. Each partner has his own vlan on eth1. I tried shaping but was only able to shape outbound traffic on the eth1.100 interface. Inbound shaping was also possible, but

Hi all, The patch below does four trivial changes and one big change Trivial changes, these are all in br_netfilter.c: - check ar_pln==4 when giving bridged ARP packets to arptables - delete unnecessary if in br_nf_local_in - add more logging for the "Argh" message - add some brag-comments in the file head comment Big change: let {ip,arp}tables see VLAN tagged {I,AR}P packets. This

Hi, The attached patches enables the bridge to filter and forward packets according to their IEEE 802.1q headers. The goals behind this change include : - Enable running STP on 802.1q tagged networks. STP packets must be untagged. It isn't obvious how else to enable STP with the current bridge and vlan code. - Add native support for an untagged vlan. Currently an untagged vlan can

I couldn''t find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I guess I''ll ask here. My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of Openvpn where I''m using zlib compression to improve the compression a bit. The goal is to shape traffic coming from a routing server through the vpn to the endpoint of the vpn and in such a way maximize the

Hi all! :) I see that this is partially covered in the mailing list archive but at the moment I can''t find a straight & working answer. I have an imq device with dynamically attacched classes/qdiscs/filters. There is a hashing filter that maps the last octet of an user''s IP address to a class (and associated qdisc). The "empty" filter looks like this: filter

I''m trying to set up a shaper that can shape the inbound traffic to around 40 subnets, that hang on 3 different interfaces of the router. As Linux can''t do ingress shaping I''m left with having to set up 3 seperate shapers, one for each internal interface. This is not completely optimal as I''ll have to limit each of the 3 interfaces to 1/3 of the total

Hi all, A new member and new post. Is it possible to manage bandwidth marking the packets based on VLAN tags using ebtables? Samit

Hello to everybody, Sorry if my english isn?t very good. I need pass 802.1q through a VPN between two offices. I have mounted a WRT54GL, with OpenWRT firmware, conected to a switch trunk port in both offices. In the switch of the first office I have created five tagged VLANs and I need pass these VLAN to the second offices where it has created it too. Can I do this with Tinc in HUB/Switch

I would like to differentiate incoming traffic streams to guarantee minimum bandwidth to some services. However, as per the Adv-Routing-HOWTO it appears that only outgoing traffic can be shaped. Is this correct or is there a way of shaping incoming traffic? The problem could possibly be overcome if there is a way of routing traffic through a virtual host. Any tips on how to go about that? --

> Use an Intel pro/100 or pro/1000 driver..they are known to > work with VLANs. > > I guess it's also possible that it's a problem in the > bridging code, so try the latest kernel > as well... I compiled the latest 2.6.19 kernel and tested it with two 3COM 3c905c fast ethernet interfaces which work fine with vlan 802.1q tagging, but when I have added the eth0 and eth1

On a router, there is no need for and IMQ because there is always an egress path. For example: Internet -> eth1 -> iptables -> routing -> ... -> egress qdisc -> eth0 -> LAN LAN -> eth0 -> iptables -> routing -> .... -> egress qdisc -> eth1 -> Internet Local Process / Proxy -> routing -> iptables -> egress qdisc -> eth1/eth0 ->

Thanks, The only issue here is that for each service I need to create 200 child classes if I have 200 clients... Let me explain the problem better I have the following connection from my ISP: (1024/1024) (rate/ceil) 1) First, I want to divide the 1024 into smaller pieces based on priority: 256/256 - P2P (I want to limit the P2P traffic as much as possible) 256/1024 - HTTP 256/1024 - FTP

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).

Hi! I''m doing load balancing for 5 dsl lines, each one with a dsl router attached to a linux machine ethernet plug. The problem is that I''m adding 15 more dsl lines, and I don''t have enough PCI slots in the linux machine to sum up 20 ethernet plugs (I already have 2 quad ethernet cards). So I''m considering connecting all dsl routers and the linux machine to a

Hi, all. I see that the Polycom SoundPoint IP 330 supports VLAN... but I don't quite see how that works. Do you point a non-VLAN'd segment at it (akin to when you uplink a VLAN_enabled switch), and have the phone implement the VLAN? Or...? *puzzled* Thanks much, -Ken

-----Original Message----- >From: Tommy Christensen [mailto:tommy.christensen@tpack.net] >Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:09 AM >To: Christian Darnell >Cc: 'Linux 802.1Q VLAN'; Bart De Schuymer; netdev@oss.sgi.com; bridge >Subject: Re: [Bridge] RE: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables >"see" bridged VLAN tagged{I,AR}P packets > > > >This

List Out of interest, I use transparent squid proxies for caching websites, and I shape the clients that browse the net, this all works perfectly so no questions in this regard... CLIENT <--- eth0 ----> SQUID <----- ppp0 -----> NET What I just realised was that all egress traffic on eth0 gets shaped, squid gets data from ppp0 and hence is not shaped. Does this mean that squid