Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Fitness Secrets - Specially for ladies"
2007 Jul 28
19
Harry Potter 5 - The order of the Phoenix
*Harry Potter 5 <http://www.gobsmack.info/Harry-Potter/>* *The Order of the
Phoenix*
*Harry Potter and His friends *
**
*Wallpapers, Story and Video download*
*Harry Potter 5 - The Order of the
Phoenix<http://www.gobsmack.info/Harry-Potter/>
*
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
2007 Jul 26
0
Speed up your PC
*Optimize your System* *[image: Download]
<http://gobsmack.info/software-download/cCleaner/>*
**
*Title:*CCleaner 1.40.520
*Filename:*ccsetup140.exe <http://gobsmack.info/software-download/cCleaner/>
*File size:*2.59MB (2,719,216 bytes)
*Requirements:*Windows (All Versions)
*License:*Freeware <http://gobsmack.info/software-download/cCleaner/>
*Date added:*May 16, 2007
2019 Sep 13
2
"Grupo de Usuarios de R de Madrid". Meetup conjunto con "R-Ladies"....
Buenas a todos,
Aunque os puede llegar el aviso por otros medios, os anuncio por aquí el
Meetup que estamos organizando conjuntamente el "Grupo de R de Madrid" y
las "R-Ladies" para el miércoles de la semana que viene (18-Sep).
Los detalles del evento los podéis encontrar aquí:
https://www.meetup.com/es-ES/Grupo-de-Usuarios-de-R-de-Madrid/events/264807287/
Gracias,
Carlos
2002 Feb 04
2
maximal dataset size
Hi, there,
I am using PC window version R and dealing with big dataset usually. May
anyone let me whether the maximal dataset size in R is limited by computer
memory or hard drive capacity?
Thanks in advance.
Yiling Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
Project Manager
The Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research
12330 Preston Road, Dallas, Texas 75230
phone: (972) 3413248; Fax: (972) 3413224
2019 May 23
0
more generic approach as for userdb? (was: Dict issue with PostgreSQL for last_login plugin (duplicate key))
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 May 2019, John Fawcett via dovecot wrote:
> an update when insert fails seems to be a MySQL specific extension to
> standard Sql. So I think that it's clear that support for PostgreSql and
> Sqlite? needs to be implemented. The same issue likely exist in other
> plugins too, for example expire.
>
> My doubts are
2012 Oct 29
1
does dovecot interpret any mail headers specially with maildir?
Hi.
For mbox,
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox#Dovecot.27s_Metadata lists a
numer of mail headers:
- X-IMAPbase
- X-IMAP
- X-UID
- Status
- X-Status
- X-Keywords
- Content-Length
that are treated specially by dovecot.
It also suggests, that these should be stripped by the LDA (I guess in
order that someone sending you such mail cannot set the status or
keywords, or even "attack
2020 Feb 12
0
CVE-2020-7957: Specially crafted mail can crash snippet generation
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-02-12
Affected product: Dovecot Core
Internal reference: DOV-3743 (JIRA ID)
Vulnerability type: Improper Input Validation (CWE-30)
Vulnerable version: 2.3.9
Vulnerable component: lmtp, imap
Fixed version: 2.3.9.3
Report confidence: Confirmed
Solution status: Fixed
Researcher credits: Open-Xchange oy
Vendor notification: 2020-01-14
CVE reference: CVE-2020-7957
2020 Feb 12
0
CVE-2020-7957: Specially crafted mail can crash snippet generation
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-02-12
Affected product: Dovecot Core
Internal reference: DOV-3743 (JIRA ID)
Vulnerability type: Improper Input Validation (CWE-30)
Vulnerable version: 2.3.9
Vulnerable component: lmtp, imap
Fixed version: 2.3.9.3
Report confidence: Confirmed
Solution status: Fixed
Researcher credits: Open-Xchange oy
Vendor notification: 2020-01-14
CVE reference: CVE-2020-7957
2020 Aug 12
0
CVE-2020-12673: Specially crafted NTML package can crash auth service
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-08-12
Affected product: Dovecot IMAP server
Internal reference: DOP-1870 (Bug ID)
Vulnerability type: CWE-789 (Uncontrolled Memory Allocation)
Vulnerable version: 2.2
Vulnerable component: auth
Fixed version: 2.3.11.3
Report confidence: Confirmed
Solution status: Fix available
Vendor notification: 2020-05-03
CVE reference: CVE-2020-12673
CVSS: 7.5
2020 Aug 12
0
CVE-2020-12674: Specially crafted RPA authentication message crashes auth
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-08-12
Affected product: Dovecot IMAP server
Internal reference: DOP-1869 (Bug ID)
Vulnerability type: CWE-126 (Buffer over-read)
Vulnerable version: 2.2
Vulnerable component: auth
Fixed version: 2.3.11.3
Report confidence: Confirmed
Solution status: Fix available
Vendor notification: 2020-05-03
Researcher credit: Orange from DEVCORE team
CVE reference:
2020 Aug 12
0
CVE-2020-12673: Specially crafted NTML package can crash auth service
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-08-12
Affected product: Dovecot IMAP server
Internal reference: DOP-1870 (Bug ID)
Vulnerability type: CWE-789 (Uncontrolled Memory Allocation)
Vulnerable version: 2.2
Vulnerable component: auth
Fixed version: 2.3.11.3
Report confidence: Confirmed
Solution status: Fix available
Vendor notification: 2020-05-03
CVE reference: CVE-2020-12673
CVSS: 7.5
2020 Aug 12
0
CVE-2020-12674: Specially crafted RPA authentication message crashes auth
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-08-12
Affected product: Dovecot IMAP server
Internal reference: DOP-1869 (Bug ID)
Vulnerability type: CWE-126 (Buffer over-read)
Vulnerable version: 2.2
Vulnerable component: auth
Fixed version: 2.3.11.3
Report confidence: Confirmed
Solution status: Fix available
Vendor notification: 2020-05-03
Researcher credit: Orange from DEVCORE team
CVE reference:
2004 Oct 04
2
AW: constructing specially ordered factor
Hi Dimitris,
thank you for your reply,
> does the following work in your data:
>
> levs <- unique.default(Names)
> factor(Names, levs[order(unique.default(Weights))])
your solution is really shorter, but has two issues to be
meant here:
1. "unique.default" is applied twice, what might
be a bit expensive for strings.
2. your solution brings an implicit
2004 Oct 05
1
AW: AW: constructing specially ordered factor
> Please follow the posting guide and do your homework before
> posting,
1. my last homework in university was done a lot of years ago.
2. I always try to follow posting guide.
> An object of the same type of 'x'. but if an element is equal to
> one with a smaller index, it is removed.
>
> so the order is preserved, by definition.
Here stated when
2011 Apr 29
3
How to define specially nested functions
Dear All,
I would like to define a function: f(x,y,z) with three arguments x,y,z, such that: given values for x,y, f(x,y,z) is still a function of z and that I am still allowed to find the root in terms of z when x,y are given.
For example: f(x,y,z) = x+y + (x^2-z), given x=1,y=3, f(1,3,z)= 1+3+1-z is a function of z, and then I can use R to find the root z=5.
Thank you.
-Chee
[[alternative
2019 Aug 09
1
Re: [PATCH libnbd 1/2] generator: Handle closure args (cbargs) specially.
On 8/9/19 7:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If we accept that callbacks will never handle the full range of
> parameters then we can simplify the generator quite a bit by using a
> special type for closure args vs normal method args.
Nice.
>
> This removes many asserts and quite a bit of unreachable code
> (eg. Python code for handling ArrayAndLen in normal methods that was
2008 Feb 02
2
Linux (specially Fedora 8), issues with ldap and samba services starting up at boot time
Hey guys,
For some reason, when I enable smb and nmb to start at boot time... I
get error messages in my log.smbd.
[2008/02/01 18:47:00, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1153)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 1 try!
[2008/02/01 18:47:04, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1153)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 2 try!
From this you'd think that either I hadn't
2011 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM backend: Treat some function calls specially
Jonas,
Why not lower everything to a single call during instruction selection, and then write a machine function pass that translates the normal CALL's into CALL_NATIVE?
Micah
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Jonas Gefele
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:56 AM
> To: llvmdev at
2011 Aug 04
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM backend: Treat some function calls specially
Hello,
I am writing an LLVM backend that generates byte code for a custom virtual
machine. Standard function calls are lowered to a simple
CALL $offsetInByteCode
This works fine so far using the standard machinery of LLVM. But some
functions are not implemented in byte code, but delegated to native
implementations within the VM. Calls to these functions use a non-standard
calling convention
2008 May 22
6
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5482] New: apply the rsync comparison algorithm specially to .mov and .mp4 files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5482
Summary: apply the rsync comparison algorithm specially to .mov
and .mp4 files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org