similar to: Slipt 2 ISP strange routing problem

hi all, i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover, i have applied julian patch, but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for that destination, but i get different interface for that entries, so it doesn''t forward my requests, i have done masquerading for client nodes, the ip rule/route are as follows, ip rule add prio 222 table

i´ve been searching for a load balance solution since a month ago... what i can say is that it simply doesn´t work. I was unable to find one guy that did it with sucess. When "load balance" is the subject of the message on the list, the message is simply ignored. So... if it doesn´t work... why LARTC don´t delete it from the HOW TO and answer us with some "it simply doesn´t

First of all i wanna thanks Christoph Simon for the support. Only after his reply to my email i could see the real solution to the problem (Valeu mesmo cara... me ajudou pra caramba! Fico te devendo essa!) :) Here is what i learned in a month of research: I tried A LOT of things to do load balance, including the one at LARTC homepage. The only tutorial that REALLY works in my case is the

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hi, I dont really know if this is the right place to post this question..If its not pl let me know... Here is what i am looking for. I have two machines with two ethernet cards.One of these machine has an ftp server(vsftpd). When i request a file from the first machine i want that machine be able to start an ftp, and when each of the packet of the file go to one of the ethernet cards, i want

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

I''m moving to a new place and my new flatmate wants a router because he likes the cleaness of it all in a non geeky way which I can understand. This means it''s going to be hard for me to pursude him to let me run a computer as a router to act as bandwidth cop. But I don''t fancy trying to use ssh, VNC and games while he''s using WindowsUpdate or p2p. So I need

In a recent thread on this list, Robert Kurjata provided me a patch to add hashing by iptables mark to the Linux 2.4 version of ESFQ. Thanks to that contribution, I was able to easily add support to the 2.6 port I maintain. I found out, however, that the existing hash algorithm results in a lot of colllisions when the range of hashed values is small. The purturbation spreads the collisions out a

I'm trying to devise a way to playback more than one file per call when I copy my file 'Test.call' into .. var/spool/asterisk/outgoing Channel: Zap/1/put_your_phone_number_here Application: Playback Data: demo-thanks + a-second-file + a-third-file Is there some way to do this? Charlie Hatchette chatchette@generalcare.com

I am working on my Diploma Thesis on Computer Science Engineering. The main idea behind of my work is to make it possible to have a Linux box combining multiple ISP/network connections together providing a single connection with an aggregated bandwith. I have been surfing the Internet and I haven''t found anything like that running on Linux. I would like to implement it using iproute 2

You want multiple IP Addresses for email if you are hosting more than one domain. The reason is, everyone now checks for reverse DNS with email so you need a different public IP Address for each email domain. This way, all the reverse DNS translations will be unique. For apache, you can have multiple websites sharing the same IP Address as long as you don''t do anything with SSL. SSL

Dear all - Some wisom please. We have a need to customise the Q.931 clearing causes being sent back to the network based on decisions made in some scripts or extension logic. i.e. I want to be able to decide to clear a call (either answered or during the alerting phase) with any clearing cause needed. E.g. 'All circuits busy' or 'network fault' or 'vacant number' etc.

[Off topic ?] Somebody can help me to convince some people to use Linux instead MikroTik ???? Happy new year. Andres.

Hi! In our students'' hostel we have 6 DSL lines (dialups to different providers); we have set up a linux box (currently running 2.6.11-rc2-mm2, but the problem described hereafter also applies to previous 2.6-series kernels) with help from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN298 Our Setup looks like this: 10.0.0.0/8 10.70.255.1 +----------+ +-----------+ |

Hello I have two DSL modems witch are connected to my isp, in future my boss want to buy another connection via DSL modem. Then i will have 3 DSL modems. With every DSL modem i get 3x8 IP`s (netmask 248) from my ISP, now i have question how to configure gateway wich tools should i use. Because ip route and next hop via. wich i use now makes his work fine but with new kernels there is an error

Hi! Some time ago I faced a problem in limiting traffic on host with multiple uplinks. Since all the stuff worked nice seemed that there will be no problems. But then I realized that P2P users are smart enough to bypass limits as sfq doesn''t give fair sharing in this case (thousands of connections from one user versus few from the other). I tried IMQ but it''s instability in my

Hi, A stupid flat directory /tmp holding 5 millon files, the directory locates on a ext3 file system with dir_index feature turned on. The running Linux are FC4 and FC5. The files are just directly under /tmp, not in any subdirectories -- they are results of mis-operations of users. Then a 'ls' or 'find' command will take one hour to finish, a lot of other applications on

Hello Everyone, Hope everyone is doing well. First off I would like to say that Lartc has been an invaluable source of information for me, I was looking for a solution and a bit of google''ing found this wonderful HOW-TO. So now down to the Question: I have three Internet connections, (Soon to be four if I can get this working) ETH0 - 2mb/2mb ETH1 - 7mb/1mb ETH2 - 7mb/1mb I wish

Hello! I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20 kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some kind or bittorrent client which uses many

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres