similar to: Re: IP in IP tunneling [LARTC-HowTo update ?]

Hello, I am attempting to set an IP-IP tunnel between two PC in a same LAN in order to evaluate the performances of the tunnel (kernel 2.4.26). I read the section of LARTC HowTo about it and it seems simple but i do not succeed in setting it. I don''t find the new_tunnel.o module (cf LARTC HowTo). I found Configure.help a bit confusing : CONFIG_NET_IPIP "Saying Y to this option

Hi, Can any one please guide how do I handle the SIP phone-context URI parameter. I got following traces.. 9.191690 IP_A -> IP_B SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:12599;phone-context=private at IP_B:5060;user=phone, with session description 9.191942 IP_B -> IP_A SIP Status: 404 Not Found 9.195656 IP_A -> IP_B SIP Request: ACK sip:12599;phone-context=private at

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:28:47AM +0100, <Alpt>: ~> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:29:21AM +0100, <Alpt>: ~> ~> The multipath code creates new cached routes. Since ~> ~> after connect the socket is "connected", i.e. saddr and ~> ~> daddr are known and they are always provided when resolving ~> ~> route ~> ~> ~> ~> So, the connected

Hi there, I''m trying to achieve the classic load balancing using the multipath. The gateways are: A (tunl0) and B (tunl1) This is the classical situation covered by the HOWTO: one computer with two Internet connections. The problems come when I try to use the same IPs for both A and B. So A is 10.229.25.8 and B 10.229.25.8. I cannot do otherwise, I''m forced to use the

Hi,all I have a POP3 problem about multi users from one IP address concurrent. [Issue description] The network architecture is as following. I have setup a mail server(sendmail/dovecot) in PlaceA with IP_A. And about 6 users are receving mail from the same IP_B( NATed public IP) in PlaceB. Their mails are many( about 1Mb/hour each) and ususally set fetch time as 10min/fetch. Then they

Hi, I have setup a dovecot pop3 server on IP_A and using mbox format I have 6 users behind a NATed network, the public IP is IP_B. And one mail of one user seems contain format error. He always cannot receive the 5th mail from anywhere. Then when he receive mail in the intranet, all the TCP/IP connection REST between IP_A and IP_B. http/ssh/pop/smtp etc. all NG. After I delete the 5th mail

Hi, I have a problem with GRE tunneling. I read Advanced-Routing HOWTO about this and I did all as is written in this documentation. Even the same example is here which I need for my project. I want create (by means of GRE tunneling or IP in IP tunneling) virtual private network VPN - in first phase without IPsec in other phase with IPsec. I have two local networks distant apart with two routers.

Hello I have /25 addressed on a box (virtual devices on eth0) and I want to tunnel some of these addresses to my home network. One address to my gateway (a.b.c.d, external IP) and one address to my internal network (192.168.0.0/24-style). I will use the tunnels for irc, smtp and surfing. What protocol and which technique is easiest and best to use? One more thing. I don''t want to set up

Hello Gurus, I am a small problem with routing and here are the details. Interfaces on my server: * ipsec0 - 172.19.58.94 * tunl0 - 172.19.58.94 * eth0 - 172.19.58.94 Now, the problem is that there is another host 172.19.58.200. All communication to 172.19.58.200 should be through tunl0, and all the data should be secured using IPSec (tunnel mode - because there are more machines on my

Hi all. I experienced a strange behaviour in the "arp" command when I use the "pub" (publishing) flag. This is the scenario (I know it''s an unusual one, but it''s just for a test): __________ | | | host C | | | |__________| | __________|________________________________

Hi Everyone, I am running multiple instances of Asterisk in Proxmox and so far I had one central Asterisk feeding all others with trunks from one provider. Now, I want to connect each Asterisk server directly to the provider. Based on my understanding, each connection made to the provider port 5060 would be on a port that is unique to that server. And so other connections made to the same

Hello All, The following is what I was trying to do: A packet [Dest: 10.10.10.2, Src: 10.10.10.30] has a route through "tunl0". The bigger problem is that "tunl0" is a tunnel between 10.10.10.2 and 10.10.10.20... Which means that after encapsulation takes place, the packet would look like [Dest: 10.10.10.2, Src: 10.10.10.20 [Dest: 10.10.10.2, Src: 10.10.10.30]]. Thing

Hi, I''m trying to do some horrible private address routing between networks. Is there a way to handle the following? I''m guessing policy routing *might* be the way, but anyway... Two networks, accessible via public addresses -- a /29 on each. Each network, however, has more machines than this, so one also has 192.168.0.0/24 and the other has 192.168.1.0/24. I have an IPIP

Hello Tom and others on the list. Tom - you might recall that the other day (night) I had problems with my axip setup (protocol 93) and we made some changes to the policy, zones and interfaces files. You added ''peers and tunl+'' Following that change nothing seemed to work. In fact you wanted to see the shorewall status file, among other things. Well - tonight, I carefully put

I wonder if someone can tell me what these ''unknown'' remarks mean in my status file. They are only in the last portion of the file and are listed below. If they mean nothing, I will rest easy. But if not it means I need to fix something. Your thoughts would be appreciated. ---------------- udp 17 92 src=24.224.173.220 dst=24.222.0.75 sport=1027 dport=53 src=24.222.0.75

Hello, Looking here http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.tunnel.ip-ip.html It says to load a new_tunnel.o module. There is no such module on 2.6.9, so where would I find up-to-date documentation on ip tunnels in the Linux kernel? Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <michael_soulier@mitel.com>, 613-592-2122 x2522 "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a

I think I might have miss understood where it is failing, has this file been added to the DB on the web site or does it fail when you try to onfigure this? Carle Simmonds Infrastructure Consultant Technology Services Experian UK Ltd __________________________________________________ Tel: +44 (0)115 941 0888 (main switchboard) Mobile: +44 (0)7813 854834 E-Mail: carle.simmonds at uk.experian.com

Hi everyone; I have a problem on my 10 nodes cluster with ocfs2 1.2.9 and the OS is RHEL 4.7 AS. 9 nodes can start o2cb service and mount san disks on startup however one node can not do that. My cluster configuration is : node: ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 192.168.5.1 number = 0 name = fa01 cluster = ocfs2 node: ip_port =

Hi, I am using linux kernle-2.6.15, iptables-1.4 and bridge-utils-1.4. Everything intslled without any issue and i am able to enable the bridge and traffic is also flowing without any issue. But i did not see any traffic on the iptables forward chain due to which i am not able to control the traffic. Do i requie enable anything more to make the traffic pass through iptables forward chain.

Thanks a lot , Everythings is working now. Quoting Alex Martin <alex@rettc.com>: > > > At this point point ip addr show: > > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue > > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > > 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000