similar to: (no subject)

Hi all I have a problem splitting traffic behind 2 adsl. My situation: _________router2 | lan1 ------- fw ----------- router1 | lan2----------| lan1 use router1, lan2 router2. The linux default gw is set to router2, lan2 browse internet without any problem (icmp, tcp..). Lan1 is blocked. >From lan1 i can ping router1, and i''ve set

Hello, In project, a customer has two WAN access. More precisely: Internet ----- <ISP1> --- Router1 ----<LAN1>--- FortiGate Firewall Router ------<LAN> ---- Asterisk | | -------------<ISP2> --- Router2 ----<LAN2>------------------ Both WAN access offer Gigabit-like performance and each

Hello Samba experts, Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!! I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to "see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2 workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when

> I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in > existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). > Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which > shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is > this: > > There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San

For anyone to answer that clearly, we''d need a bit more information. Firstly, what is connected to router1 and router2? In other words, does the router box you want to use have enough ports (and of the right type) to actually handle all of the connections? Secondly, can we assume that you have enough access to the box you want to use to be able to install the software and configure it?

Hi , I am trying to set up a GRE tunnel between two linux routers. The routers have a 400 MHz Processor. Linux .2 65.0.0.2 Linux LAN1 -------- Router -------- INTERNET ---- Router ---- LAN2 10.10.10.0 .1 208.1.0.1 (Simulated) .1 .1 192.168.2.0/24 /24 Scripts to Create the tunnel ip tunnel add tun0 mode gre remote 65.0.0.1 local

Hello list, Here is a setup of my network: eth0 <-> router1 <-> eth2 --- wifi --- eth2 <-> router2 <-> eth0 | | eth1 eth1 Router1: eth0 - Internet connection eth1 - Local network (network 10.1.1.0/24) eth2 - Wireless AP (network 10.1.10.0/24) Router2: eth0 - Internet

Dear tinc community, I am using tinc in switch mode. I have three nodes. Two nodes reside on routers, vpn-eth is bridged with internal lan, each router has several machines connected to it's internal lan. Third node is the roadwarrior - "endpoint" linux PC. When the roadwarrior is off - everything works perfectly, machines on both sides can communicate without a problem in any

I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is this: There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San Francisco to via VPN. The TCP/IP part is

Thanks Jose, I found the key in the routing table of Router2; it had bad entries for the farest subnets (didn't have the 'via' commands...). Thanks for helping me. Now I'm gonna configure the network with IPv6 'cause I have to make it work with Mobile IPv6. Anybody working on these funny things can mail me, so we can suffer togheter! :-) Bye, Mauro -----Messaggio

So this is a little off topic but this list is so helpful!! Is this the correct way to split our /24 block up? Tom suggested something like this in an earlier post but that did not work either. So what should I change to make this work? Internet<===Shorewall Box===>router1<++++T1 Line++++>router2<==LAN I need a /28 on the Shorewall side of things and the rest on the LAN side of

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall router2 |

Hi, I have a linux system which is router between several subnets (each also a different segment), in total 3 different lans, 2 dmz, and 4 internet connections, my default FORWARD policy is DROP, here is a simplified example of my config with only two lan segments and internet connection: Allow forwarding between lans -A FORWARD -s lan1/mask -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -d lan1/mask -j ACCEPT -A

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only internet. How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?

Hi, I am new in LARTC list. I had intermediate skills in networking. What I tried to do: Use 2 links with loadsharing + falt toletant (to add bandwitdh) ok ! I am use Debian Etch in router/fw With kernel debian default + routes-2.6.17-12.diff patch The Problem: The iproute2 just route thought the last gateway of nexthop rule. I was running tcpdump in 2 terminals, tcpdump -nni eth0 ...

An very interesting test did yesterday that, LAN1 and LAN2 setup an tinc VPN which is quite simple(the physical link between tinc nodes are quite stable/fast), and no any application traffic to go through the tinc. Later, I setup smokeping which LAN1 initial 20 ping to LAN2 on a per-minute basis, but as you saw from the below picture, it had packet drop. But if I perform a constantly ping from

Hi folks, I have 2 firewalls, setup with Centos 5.2. They are also routers, connected to 2 upstream routers. I have some cases where connections from servers to the internet leave my network via router2 and answers come back via router1. So I added conntrack tools to both routers/firewalls to synchronize the session tables (using ftfw procotol). That works as expected. If e.g. I ping from

Hi, list members. I''ve been reading a lot about traffic control because at work we have the following configuration...... LINUX BOX _____ 100 mbit | | LAN1--------------|eth0 | | | 2 mbit SDSL | eth1|-------------------INTERNET 100 mbit | | LAN2--------------|eth2 | | | ------- The linux box (REDHAT 9-2.4.20-30.9) acts as a firewall-NAT solution for both

Hello, I have a problem with the following setup, I hope you can help me. I have two internet gateways, one for LAN1 and the second for LAN2. +--------------+ GW1 more eth0| |eth4(SNAT) GW2 ---...routers...-----+ router +----------------- | | +---+------+---+ eth1|

I have the following situation: A Linux 2.4.22 server: Physical ethernet: lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet) lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port) Tunnel: tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode VLAN's: lan2.201 lan2.202 lan2.203 tap1.201 tap1.202 tap1.203 Bridges: br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201) br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202) br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203) On the other end, the same type of server: