similar to: cbq dosen''t shape on MARK for one host.. strange!

I was trying to install iproute2-2.2.4. I get an error when i run the makefile. I get a parse error in /usr/include/arpa/inet.h. Can someone help me? Thanks. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

Dear all, I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here have done exactly what i want. Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my eth1 is not restrciting total bandwidth at 100kbps. According to search on google imq is the solution.

Hi folks. Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network using HTB. I have 2 clients: PC1: 192.168.100.2 PC2: 192.168.100.3 Server: 192.168.100.1 This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet. It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has

Hi All, Does anyone know of a way to limit the speed of *individual* TCP sessions, but without placing any overall bandwidth limits, and without requiring an explicit QoS entry for every ip address the machine is communicating with ? The scenario is a mailserver - say you want to limit individual TCP sessions (pop3, smtp etc) to no more than 512Kbit so that an individual session

What I need to do: shape every user on my LAN to 256Kbit -- class for web trafiic with rate X ceil 256Kbit -- class for other(p2p) traffic with rate 1Kbit ceil 200Kbit This is good because even if they have p2p programs running they will always have fast web surfing. I can do it with bash scripts - one class per ip with 2 children. But I wonder if something like this would work: # class

Correct me if I''m wrong, I just want to help my friend who needs a tc solution with fairness to hosts on a 512K/s DSL line, but few of them should be restricted to 64K/s I thought about htb + esfq (sfq with ip based fairness, not connection) parent class with CEIL=500Kbit (no RULE? see *1) and attached esfq to this parent class, now child class with CEIL=64Kbit and RULE=10.0.0.1

Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and 1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2) [general] priorityjumping=yes With n+101: exten => 1337,1,Dial(SIP/zytek,5,Ttj) exten => 1337,102,Dial(SIP/zytek,${RINGTIME},${OPTIONS}) exten => 1337,n,Hangup -- Executing [1337 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/113-087a3000", "SIP/zytek|5|Ttj") in new stack -- Called zytek

Asterisk 1.4.6 at FreeBSD6.2-RELEASE Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. Is this normal behaviour? How to change this? Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial. -- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-08737000",

I''ve idendified the problem... description: problem in XEN bridged-network. Dom0 doesn''t respond at external network activity (DomUs may work correctly) problem: something related to Broadcom NetXtreme II menagement solution: follow all this instructions: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.hardware.dell.poweredge/23276 bye, s.

Hi, I have two asterisk servers and I want to make these servers call each other as they were internal. I have succeeded in one way. Server B can call Server A without problem, but Server A cannot call Server B. Here's the iax configuration of servers Server A: ================== [ipek] auth=rsa context=from-internal host=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX inkeys=ipek outkey=odtu peercontext=from-internal

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1691 Bug ID: 1691 Summary: mnl_nlmsg_ok returns true on malformed/incomplete messages leading to potential runtime issues Product: libmnl Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1374 Bug ID: 1374 Summary: Add a way to suppress printing of set contents in 'nft list ...' output Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Me again, another problem. As I said before, I have 2 lines going into "incoming" context. When client calls, I press Flash, client hears music on hold (only on voip line as said in previous post), when I get back and press Flash again to get back to my client I cannon hear him, but he hears me without problems. I have just tested in on the LAN, same situations, happens everytime.

Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this call. ******************************************************************************** CALL FOR PAPERS 5th Workshop on Statistical and Machine learning approaches to ARchitecture and compilaTion

asterisk-1.4.7, Fedora 7, intel emt64 - nocona: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/alsa.conf': Found ALSA lib pcm_dsnoop.c:558:(snd_pcm_dsnoop_open) unable to open slave [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:365 alsa_card_init: snd_pcm_open failed: No such file or directory [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:481 soundcard_init: Problem opening alsa I/O devices == No sound

Hi, I've recently upgraded Asterisk to the latest version 1.4.9 on a PBX that manages several queues, but at least on one queue strategy (leastrecent) it doesn't seem to be distributing the calls has it should. I think this strategy should work like this: a) Make a list of available agents and their idle time (time since last call) and

Hi, All, I have a question about agents and queues. Right now we have about 4 queues in our system. Some agents are in multiple queues. Our main queue is for technical support and it's by far our busiest queue as well. We have the autologoff feature set to 14 sec right now in the agents.conf file. The problem I'm running into is we don't want people in our sales queue (who are

Hello there, Im currently taking a Senior Design Course at my college. We are developing an online document editor prototype with Rails. I am not well-versed in Rails. As a matter of fact, we chose it for the project in order to learn it. The problem we have is the following: We have a User model (id, username, password, email) and we have a Document model (id, name, content, owner_id). A