similar to: network scripts debian

I''m getting the following error/warning at some point in my config script, and I''m not sure which class it is referring to. htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?! I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate limits the bandwidth, so I don''t understand why this

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

FYI this topic has been covered on the Zebra and Quagga lists - hardware processors, memory, NICs, etc - software OS (Linux, *BSD), drivers, etc I''ve been running a couple of Linux routers for about 2 years now, I''m using them as core routers so I bought a couple of rackmount "server" boxes with redundant PSUs and h/w RAID (1) for hotswap disks. I''m using

hi, question. i was reading the howto, and the part about load balancing talk about to providers, well i have one provider and make to dial-modem conection, so i have the same gateway in both (ppp0 and ppp1) but to diferent IP. what do i have to do? just set up the default route to be a multipath route? or do i need to split the access? _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box with 5 N/W cards of which one is 10/100/1000T and the others are 10/100T. I connected all the cards and turned on the machine. I wanted to force eth0 to be the 1000T cards but the cards get allotted eth0 to eth4 randomly. Is there some way wherein I can force my 1000T card to be eth0. Also I want to turn off auto negotation & flow control on the 1000T

I''m sure that I had found (and printed out ...) a really good tutorial that explain how to use Julian Anastasov''s routing patch, but I can''t seem to find it now. Any pointers? -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

On 4/4/19 3:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:09:18 -0500 > John McMonagle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I managed to do migration using "classicupgrade". >> Doing tests with debian buster 2:4.9.4+dfsg-4. >> For the moment using samba internal dns and sub-domain of >> ad.advocap.org. Had issue

On 3/19/19 2:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:04:27 -0500 > John McMonagle <johnm at advocap.org> wrote: > >> I'm open to alternatives but need to be up and running 24/7 on the >> linux side. >> My boss hates windows more than I do and will likely be looking for a >> new job if I use windows to administer the the linux side.

I managed to do migration using "classicupgrade". Doing tests with debian buster 2:4.9.4+dfsg-4. For the moment using samba internal dns and sub-domain of ad.advocap.org. Had issue forwarding dns if I used main domain. When it comes to real production will use bind that I understand better but don't want to mess with my other dns servers now. Had a w10 box join samba4 ad

I'm open to alternatives but need to be up and running 24/7 on the linux side. My boss hates windows more than I do and will likely be looking for a new job if I use windows to administer the the linux side. We only use windows if there is no other way do do something. On 3/19/19 12:08 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:03:12 -0500 > John McMonagle via samba

Christian Thanks for the information. Also thanks to mj. That's sounds promising How did you migrate your data? Did you need to add any schema to samba4 ad? Were in 5 cities and some of the Internet is not 100% reliable. Will need samba4 in each office to make sure they can log in even if the Internet is down. How reliable is the the ad syncing? Does it need a lot of bandwidth? One of the

We are currently running samba3 nt4 domain controllers using smb-ldap-tools. We want to convert to samba4 ad so we can run new versions of windows server. I know of: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_Domain_to_Samba_AD_(Classic_Upgrade) But that would break us by moving all ldap to the ad ldap. We have lot's of stuff in ldap. Currently administer using ldap account

Been running this for quite a while and noticed that have intermittent problems getting out. Find that if I ping the same site from 2 computers it may work on one and fail on the other. Also was surprised that some time they are going out different interfaces at the same time. Seems to work all the time from the firewall. Running 2.6.10 kernel with the multipath routing patches on a debian

In the past I have used clonzilla under xen to backup windows domains. I just tried it and it will not work. this is xen 4.1.2 and clonzilla-live 1.2.10-14 the disk line is: disk = [ ''phy:/dev/xvg0/nfdlts-c,hda,w'', ''file:/extra/isoimages/clonzilla.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'' ] It boots cd OK. The problem is devices are xvda not hda and clonzilla is not happy with

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

Should have read this first: http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/upgrades.html#id2600749 Problem is I did it the wrong way on a few production systems. Odds are this is the second time I did it wrong. Running Debian Lenny using smbldap. It mostly works. Existing members of the domain are working OK. The first thing that got my attention is was not able to join a new xp workstation to

I''m running 2.6.7 + (julian''s multi-path patch) + IMQ (imq2+beta6) and I got the following on my console while doing some stress testing: KERNEL: assertion (tp->retrans_out == 0) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1827) I don''t know what I would do to try to reproduce this condition; it only appeared once. tcp_input.c sounds deep enough to scare me off from looking

Have 4 xen servers with windows domains. 2 work OK and 2 have xp domains with slow network performance. Doing most of the testing on a xen system that currently is not in production. Running xen 4.0 with 2.6.32 kernel from lenny backports. Have xp service pack3 freshly installed with no updates. Installed gplpv gplpv_XP_0.11.0.213.msi hdtack gives 60mb/sec which is good iperf gives ~15Mbits/sec

At the list archive page (http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/) there is an amazing message from the future: the year 2032 (q1). Not that I know anything about mailman, but someone might want to "maintain" that. -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

All, Has anyone on this list tried to use DeepTest[1] with rspec? My initial attempts have failed so I would be really interested if someone has figured it out. Thanks. -Ben 1. http://www.somethingnimble.com/bliki/deep-test