similar to: QOS inquiry:WFQ?HTB?DRR?

I would like to implement an architecture to support LLQ and WFQ with Qos linux elements ! Is possible use CBQ (you can set same parameters to control WRR process) or HTB (how can i controll DRR process) structure ? My idea is to classify packets by List flows, tos flows or connections flows (as CBWFQ on CISCO ) I saw also for WRR patch (http://www.zz9.dk/wrr), but I don''t understand

Hi，All I patched htb3.6 to mips liunx 2.4.17.But when I run htb,the mips linux box will say: "Unhandled kernel unaligned access in unaligned.c:emulate_load_store_insn, line 346".Then the kernel crashed . Would anyone like to tell me how to solve this problem?Thank you very much! 　　Best Regards 　　　　　　　　swcims 　　　　　　　　swcims@163.com 　　　　　　　　　　2004-08-02

Hi all, I am using tc htb3.6 on Linux2.4.17,and it works well.I''d like to capture PPP LCP packets and put them into high priority queue.But I don''t know how to use u32 ,iptables or other methods to filter this type packet. Would anyone please provide suggstion?Thank you very much! Best Regards swcims swcims@163.com 2004-08-18

hai all i need to implement CBWFQ in linux As i wrote script in edge as: which mark the EF traffic ____________________________________________________________________-__ #!/bin/sh DEV=eth0 tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle 1: root dsmark indices 8 tc class change dev $DEV classid 1:1 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0xb8 # making two filters tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 4 protocol ip u32 tc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was searching for few days in this mailing list but I didn''t find how to solve my tc problem. Feel free to ask me more details if you think there are relevant. I''m using a Gentoo 2.4.32-gentoo-r2 and I''m trying to test a *weighted fair queuing* (WFQ) implementation. See http://home.sch.bme.hu/~tusi/wfq/ I patched

Hi, I wanted to implemente WFQ, but it is not implemented on tc. Is there any way of making something like WFQ with which is implemented on tc?? What I exactly want to do, is to select flows by IP and port destination, and priorize them, but I don''t need (and don''t really want) to fix any rate... Has anyone got any clue??? Thank you Bye

Hi all As part of may project i wants to implement the WFQ in linux, at present upto my knowledge there is no such implementation in linux. The only mannual i got from "Csaba Toth", He explained the tc command so i hope that is in linux also. DID any one know about it, Please infome me about it also, Thanks for all regards ********* *Sunil* *********

I would like to implement WFQ queuing discipline in Linux as a part of our deploma project. How to assign weight to each flow using ''tc'' commands.Then which will be the main queue. Thanks and Regards sheba

How can we have WFQ implemented in Linux.....any pointers. Also do we need a patch in Kernel to implement these. Regards Arshad

Anyone using it? I''ve tried but after about 5 min I always get kernel panic. My setup is based on nano.txt. I works well but only if CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I just wanted to play with the new mpath feature of ip. But enabling CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED always resuts in kernel panic. I''m not using any kernel patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ - are they needed

(i sent the same message from another email acount, that isn''t memberlist. sorry) Hi Everyone..!! i''m beginner in tc with htb, i''m use to limit public, and nat ip clients, i''m to add to one of my server and get this error: > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 Unknown qdisc "htb", hence option "default" is unparsable

Hi,All I use HTB to control traffic.Here is my script: /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root /usr/sbin/tc qdisc add dev nas0 root handle 1:0 htb default 60 /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb ceil 896kbit rate 896kbit prio 0 burst 60k /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb ceil 896kbit rate 537kbit prio 1 burst 60k /usr/sbin/tc class add dev

Hi,All I am using iproute2 to manage bandwith for ADSL router.High,medium,low priority are needed for different protocol port on the ADSL's upstream side,as following: LAN --- |ADSL Router|------WAN When there aren't traffic on the specific priority, its bandwidth should be borrowed by other priorities.But it doesn't work.Here is my script: /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root

I downloaded iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I did patched tc with the htb3.6_tc.diff from htb3.6-020525.tgz and when I try to use a htb script I get just errors. I did not patch the kernel, since I use kernel 2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is something else wrong? RTNETLINK

> From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@foonet.net> > Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :> Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?

I''ve the same problem of Julien Bisconti. Can someone help me ? I try to compile iproute2 for my target ppc 8260. Thank you !

Hi again, sorry to be such a bother. I got my setup to work with kernel 2.6.8.1, however the two machines where I need to implement the shaping are running a 2.4.27 kernel. I have applied the infamous June patch (htbfair.diff) already, and recompiled the modules. And I am using the tc that comes with htb3.6-020525.tgz. While I can see the packets going into the right class, it does not

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. |----| eth0|------|eth2 |-----| | B |------|___A__|------| D | |____| |eth1 |_____| __|__ | C | |____| A:three NIC was bind to br0:172.16.6.235/24 B:172.16.6.3/24 D:172.16.6.4/24 C:172.16.6.2/24 htb was used to control traffic on A stuctrul is like that(default is 1:20):

Good morning i want to enable some debug messages concering htb and gred. The reason is that i want to see the journey of the ip packet through the 2.6 kernel from the start to finish (ethernet interface up to htb and gred classification). In the sch_htc.c i have found the following /* debugging support; S is subsystem, these are defined: 0 - netlink messages 1 - enqueue 2 - drop &

Hi,Andy Thank your very much! For the MLPPP LFI,I found that in Cisco configuration,it use "ppp multilink;ppp multilink fragmentation;ppp multilink fragment-delay 20;ppp multilink interleave " command to enable MLPPP LFI.So I think just realizing the same function on my linux router would be fine.But I got no idea how to do this on linux.So is there anything with iproute2?Would you