similar to: routing mail on a different gateway

We are using Centos behind an F5 Bigip load balancer. The linux box is using bonding and tagged VLAN's Everything works fine except that when traffic is forwarded from the BigIP to the linux box on the VLAN where the web server is running the linux box returns the traffic on the wrong VLAN, It returns traffic on the lowest ordered VLAN. ie. here is a tcpdump on my load balancer showing

Does anyone have any idea what to try next? Here are the steps I have taken and the problem: (I wanted to post my question on the first line before I explained the problem and what I have tried) ---------- Node 0 has the file system mounted just fine and works great. When trying to mount on Node 1: `mount.ocfs2 /dev/mapper/data /cluster/ data` I get this error after about 30 seconds:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035 Summary: rsync hangs in solaris Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: nestor.urquiza at gmail.com QAContact:

Hello, I have an issue with multiple connections to the Internet. I tried following the steps described in [1] but things are not working properly. I would like the network setup as follows: ______ | |- ppp0 -- Dynamic IP (PPPoE on eth2) Internal---- eth0 | GW | |____|- eth1 -- Static IP -> Static''s GW From [1], the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=429 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-01-25 11:00 MET ------- Please specifically tell us about the exact kernel version, any patches that you might have applied, and the iptables version that you're using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You

Hello, I am running Shorewall 2.0.2f, on SuSE 9.2 distro, kernel 2.6.8-24.11-default My ip addr show output is as follows: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0:

Hi?guys. There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help me. I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days, disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very simple rules, as the following: # iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.21 on Tue Apr 23 09:15:14 2019 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT

Hi. I''ve got here the following configuration: (turn on fixed pitch font to be able to see the scheme in a more accurately way) Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.0.0/24) (192.168.0.229) NAT Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.1.0/24) (192.168.1.229) NAT [if doesn''t really

I''m having another little problem with my new firewall. I want outgoing port 25 from my mail server to appear on the address 65.223.121.227 so I created the file masq: eth2 192.168.124.18 65.223.121.227 tcp 25 eth1 eth5 eth1 eth3 eth1 eth4 eth1 == net0 == 209.189.103.196/27 eth2 == net1 == 65.223.121.237/28 eth3 == dmz0 eth4 == dmz1 eth5 == loc ==

On 27.06.2018 13:43, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:04:12 +0200 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> when I try to login to AD member via IP-Address from Windows Client it >> works. >> >> Login to AD Member from Windows Client via DNS Name fail. >> Windows Errorcode: 0x80070035 >>

Hello, Stephen, thank you for input. Yes, these servers have the same firewall rules, and both of them have the same problem from time to time, most of time they are good. Actually, these servers are newly installed to be used as the Glusterfs storage server, so not much data flowing at this time. >From the sysctl output, I suppose it can't be a conntrack table overflow :

Hello, first of all thank you for your patience and having answered you. I tried to change port from 8000 to 8001 but nothing happened. I am using a vps server so I don?t need to open port from router. I paste here all my icecast.xml configuration file. can you please give a llok and tell me if all seems ok to you? still thank you! *** root at mail2:/etc/icecast2# nano icecast.xml GNU nano

I have a NetGear FV318 living in my DMZ, with one of its LAN-ports living in my LOC zone. What rules are needed in shorewall to allow a certain subnet to make connections to this device from the net zone? Do I define it as a tunnel in shorewall/tunnels, or do I just allow some selected traffic to the DMZ IP? I am not sure which of the docs are right for me in this case?

[newbie question] Before using Shorewall I used to manually write some very short iptables rules which where probably much poorer than what this Shorewall gem does but I could "follow" them very easily. Now reading the output of iptable -L gives me a terrible headache. Is there some tool that graphs the rules in order to "see" them better ? For instance I was experiencing

Hello, I''ve installed a OpenSolaris dom0 snv_44 on a x4100 server, and booted a 32-bit xen kernel. I''m trying to create a OpenSolaris DOMU (snv_44) by following the howto described at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/xen/howto/create-osox-domu/. I did not manage to create a diskless environment by using SUNWCXall. I''ve created SUNWCreq instead and add the

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017, at 03:52 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > Hi! > Attached sip.conf and interface config as well. In this case we use only > TLS, but I have checked with TCP - same situation, 192.168.0.172 is used > as > a source. For UDP 192.168.0.177 is used as expected. Does the output of netstat -a confirm that it is bound to only that IP address? If so, then it seems

On 2019-08-09, Joseph Mays via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > I am looking at replacing our creaky old courier-imap server, which takes > authentication and user info from an LDAP database, with dovecot imap. Any > comments on the wisdom of this choice of action, or anything I should know > about the setting up before starting to work on it? Plenty of people have

I suppose a few questions pop up on this list about access Samba through a firewall. ?I have been very successful running Samba through a firewall, until today. ?I hit a stumbling block. I have a Linux Firewall with the public IP Address of 134.x.x.140 <it is not the exact ip address, but close>. ?I am using NAT and port forwarding to send traffic destined for 137, 138,139, and 445 for BOTH

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have set up Samba-3.0.11 to retrive account information from W2k server via winbind, and it works. But is takes about 10 sec. to retrive the information. I have dumped some traffic from the request, and it looks like this: A lot of these: 21:21:55.133423 172.20.3.131.1077 > 172.20.3.130.137: NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; UNICAST

List, I am having trouble with a previously working rsync server. Version: > # rsync --version > rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26 > Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others > <http://rsync.samba.org/> > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, > batchfiles, IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums