similar to: list archive anomaly

I''m getting the following error/warning at some point in my config script, and I''m not sure which class it is referring to. htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?! I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate limits the bandwidth, so I don''t understand why this

I''m running 2.6.7 + (julian''s multi-path patch) + IMQ (imq2+beta6) and I got the following on my console while doing some stress testing: KERNEL: assertion (tp->retrans_out == 0) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1827) I don''t know what I would do to try to reproduce this condition; it only appeared once. tcp_input.c sounds deep enough to scare me off from looking

I''m sure that I had found (and printed out ...) a really good tutorial that explain how to use Julian Anastasov''s routing patch, but I can''t seem to find it now. Any pointers? -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

FYI this topic has been covered on the Zebra and Quagga lists - hardware processors, memory, NICs, etc - software OS (Linux, *BSD), drivers, etc I''ve been running a couple of Linux routers for about 2 years now, I''m using them as core routers so I bought a couple of rackmount "server" boxes with redundant PSUs and h/w RAID (1) for hotswap disks. I''m using

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

Working at setting up some new firewalls with multi-path routing over 2 isps. Doing it with debian sarge. Problem is the normal network scripts use ifconfig and route. In my tests I did a simple setup script. Feel like I am reinventing the wheel :-) Is it OK to use the network scripts to setup the interface and then remove the routes ifconfig created and add any needed routes with ip

hi, question. i was reading the howto, and the part about load balancing talk about to providers, well i have one provider and make to dial-modem conection, so i have the same gateway in both (ppp0 and ppp1) but to diferent IP. what do i have to do? just set up the default route to be a multipath route? or do i need to split the access? _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box with 5 N/W cards of which one is 10/100/1000T and the others are 10/100T. I connected all the cards and turned on the machine. I wanted to force eth0 to be the 1000T cards but the cards get allotted eth0 to eth4 randomly. Is there some way wherein I can force my 1000T card to be eth0. Also I want to turn off auto negotation & flow control on the 1000T

> Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:44:26 -0700 > From: Nicholas Erkert <nick@erkert.com> > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread > > Glen Mabey wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:07:57PM -0400, Jos? Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: >>> >> >>>>>you can use an Athlon

glusterd.vol file is default installed with glusterfs package. So I'm not sure how did you end up into a state where this file was missing (as per my initial investigation looking at the logs). What you could do to check if this file is really missing or not by running "find / -iname glusterd.vol" and if it's indeed missing then copy it from one of the peer node and restart

Ah ok. Sorry. :) I think that argument "-femit-all-decls" will help you. Olivier. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam < arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for not being specific. I just wanted to know if there is any > way at all to force clang to generate intermediate code for static > functions when they are not being

Full_Name: Michael W. Grant Version: 1.7.1(2003-06-16) OS: Windows 98 Second Edition 4.10.2222 A Submission from: (NULL) (24.55.165.101) I just installed version 1.7.1 tonight. In the process I installed via CRAN from the menu several packages. One installation, exactRankTests, had a distinct anomaly. A DLL attempt to change FPU control word as seem in the last line of the following listing:

In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Ben Mabey <ben.mabey at recursionpharma.com> wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in > a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology

Hi Gabriel, ... > Summarizing, I have two questions: 1) is the CallGraph analysis "working as > intended" here?; and 2) what would be the correct approach > to modifying the proposed analysis in order to detect that randlc() is being > called in that CallInst ? the reason that the callgraph analysis does not try to understand indirect calls like this is that other passes

G'day, We are running Samba 2.04b on a Solaris 2.6 box as well as Samba 2.04b on a Solaris 7 box. In SWAT on the Solaris 7 box the nmbd service is seen to be running. On the Solaris 2.6 box SWAT says the nmbd service is not running. Doing a ps on the Solaris 2.6 box shows nmbd to be running. What is responsible for this anomaly? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Dave Lovett

Hi all Maybe someone knows a way to solve this anomaly in sample(): I like to compute a sample (n=100) with replications from a population of 2500 units but if I draw repeated samples from it I dont get what seems to be a representative sample if I look at other partitions of the population. Enclosed is the population g99 with 4 columns: (units, partition 1 (site), partition 2 (type), weights);

I'm confused with group mappings. I have a win2k pt_BR server in native mode. After joining the domain (samba-3.0.7) and configuring winbind, I have these standard groups: # getent group (...) MYDOMAIN\Computadores do dom?nio:x:16777216: MYDOMAIN\Controladores de dom?nio:x:16777217: MYDOMAIN\Administradores de esquemas:x:16777218:MYDOMAIN\Administrador MYDOMAIN\Administra??o de

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Alex Chekholko <alex at calicolabs.com> wrote: > In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux > box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. > Not sure if this would be the first attempt. Synology seems to bundle glusterfs in some form [1]. Regards, Vijay [1]

Hello users, I've noticed a problem when creating a stacked column plot when a column contains a negative and a positive value. e.g. series1<-c(-1,-2, 3, 4, 5) series2<-c( 5, -4,-3,-2, 1) data<-rbind(series1,series2) barplot(as.matrix(data), beside=FALSE) In these cases (i.e. first, third and fifth columns) the plotting is not handled correctly. Compare this output with that

We are currently doing research and development on an open-source runtime application monitoring system for Asterisk. This system is aimed at detecting and mitigating problems or vulnerabilities that arise from residual errors--whether unintentional or malicious--either in the application code or in its configuration or usage patterns. It can, for example, be used to detect and prevent