similar to: shaping passive ftp traffic

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "shaping passive ftp traffic"

2004 Nov 24
17
outbound shaping
Well it appears i have no clue what im doing. I thought i had the below script working to shape outbound ftp traffic....however, it is shaping inbound traffic too. I have NO clue why. Please comment if anyone has any ideas why this doesnt work. I want to shape only outbound ftp traffic and not inbound or lan traffic. #!/bin/bash #shaping passive and active outbound ftp traffic on an
2006 Mar 04
3
my shaping rules wont work on nat box
I am currently running the following script on an internal machine to shape outbound ftp and email traffic. I am trying to move the script to my nat router (ipcop with 2 nic cards) so that it shapes the whole network and not only the outbound of 1 box. I have cable modem -> ipcop (eth1) >(eth0 - 192.168.1.1) > 192.168.1.100 and 192.168.1.101. The scripts works great running on
2004 Feb 03
4
wondershaper
Hi, I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get 225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes). What should the settings in wshaper? I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec with full upload traffic. Mark
2004 Oct 08
3
shaping outbound ftp traffic
>In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >YOu''re not doing any other sort of Ingress filters are you?? No >I dont care about destination port. That line was commented. BUT, incoming transfers are being shaped for some reason. >Could this be shaping on the ISP side?? What >happens when the tc rules >are shut off?? No, everything works fine
2004 Aug 21
5
Wondershaper in internal network
I''ve gotten wondershaper to work in my linux box, which is part of a 3 computer network that shares the same dsl connection. The linuxbox handles most bulk down and uploading, and the other 2 are mainly for surfing and such. What I need from wiondershaper is that it should perform it''s tasks with all of the traffic to the dsl modem, but do nothing with the internal traffic
2004 Jul 23
2
marking and shaping outbound passive ftp traffic
Will the following rules work to mark and shape OUTBOUND ftp speed (passive ftp ports 50000-60000) on my linux server? I want to be able to run these commands on the actual computer that is running the ftp server. iptables -t mangle -N MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:60000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc
2004 Aug 05
1
marking passive ftp and shaping
I am trying to mark outbound passive ftp traffic with iptables and shape it to 35KBytes. I am using the following script on the computer that runs the ftp server. It is not working correctly, it seems to limit ALL traffic. Cant file share or anything. Anyone might know what is wrong? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the outbound passive ftp packets on ports 50000-51000
2004 Oct 07
2
shaping outbound ftp traffic on 1 nic not working properly
>Theory is.. You can only shape outbound traffic. Inbound is via tcp windowshaping etc.. In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 65437 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -m mark --mark 0
2004 Oct 06
1
shape outbound ftp with 1 nic
Hi, I am using the following script to limit my outbound traffic. This scipt runs on a box behind my firewall. It limits my outbound passive ftp traffic to 39K perfectly....just like i want. However, i just noticed that it is also limiting uploads coming to my server. Is there something I can change to make it not limit uploads to my server? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the
2002 Oct 17
18
why dont packets go where i want?
Dear All! I reach the point that I must ask you what I have to do. I am beginner at traffic shaping and I''m very confused with it. :) Here''s my script that doesn''t do what I want to do with it: tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 2 r2q 10 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 300kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:
2005 Jul 07
3
ftp firewall/iptables
I just installed CentOS4 on my main server. It runs proftpd and is not NATted.. When I did the install I said to allow FTP and HTTP. I can ftp from windows dos ftp client. In IE I get "Unable to build data connection: No route to host" ncftp I get.. Data connection timed out. Falling back to PORT instead of PASV mode. List failed. Wget and FireFox just time out. Anything I need
2005 Nov 05
3
ftp shaping and excluding ls packets
Hi, I am currently using a script to shape my outbound ftp traffic. Works great except for 1 thing. When a user goes to list a dir, the listing is also getting shaped. This causes dir listings to be very slow. Is there a way to differentiate the dir listing packets? Here is a my current script: #!/bin/bash #shaping passive and active outbound ftp traffic on an internal computer without
2003 Aug 01
2
FTP
Hello, I usualy permit TCP traffic on ports from 1025 to 65535 of the servers that I need to permit FTP access. Is there a more secure way to permit FTP access instead of to permit such ports? I have a FreeBSD gateway/router on a building with these ports open and I?m having some problems with users using softwares like Kasaa and eMule. Any help would be appreciated. Thank?s Ronan
2004 Feb 08
1
wondershaper htb + multiple ports
Is there a way to apply wondershaper w/ htb to a port range? I have a ftp server on port 65432 and passive ports 50000-60000. Is there a way to set a range? or do they have to be individually listed? The following doesnt seem to work: # low priority source ports NOPRIOPORTSRC=65432, 50000:60000 # low priority destination ports NOPRIOPORTDST= Mark
2005 Jul 07
2
ftp daemon problem
New install of CentOS 4.1; our first try at the 4.x. On previous 3.x installs we've used proftpd. On this one we're using (trying to use is a better statement of what we're going through) the default daemon, /usr/sbin/vsftpd. But we don't get anywhere. <snip> ftp> passiv Passive mode off. ftp> put ~/xorg.conf.work local: /home/jlasman/xorg.conf.work remote:
2005 Jan 26
11
Question on tcrules implementation
Hi all, I moved wshaper 1.1 cbq file to tcstart, but none of my tcrules are being observed. The only way I can set the marks is by editing the tcstart file. Is there a way to incorporate for tcstart to read and apply my set marks in tcrules? Thank you, ~Andrew Nady.
2004 Jul 28
1
shaping marked packets
Hi, I am trying to figure out how to shape the following marked packets and limit them to a speed on 30KBytes. I have read the documentation but I am unsue of what to do. iptables -t mangle -A FTP-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 Mark _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2001 May 09
1
Can't list directory on ftp.winehq.com
Hi, after opening the AUTH port in my ipchains filter, I still can't get directory listings from ftp.winehq.com. Google shows there was a bug in the ProFTPD 1.2.0pre10 which is used on ftp.winehq.com: "Bug#74153: marked as done (proftpd sometimes refuses to list directories"
2004 Apr 16
1
Traffic Shaping using Shorewall and WonderShaper
Hi Guys, I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources for understanding how to get it to work. I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts. Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to. I''ve also read through the lartc
2007 Jan 08
3
How can I do traffic shapping for passive ftp ?
Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with iptables + layer + ipp2p + tc I don''t know how to shape passive ftp ? If I put rules on port 20, 21 or using layer 7 iptables accounting still empty ... When I done a tcpdump I can see that othe port than 20 or 21 are used ... Any Ideas of how I can achieve this ? Regards