similar to: Traffic shaping: upload should not hurt download

Dear list: I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful with anybody who can help me. I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to share between several computers. I have eth0, with a public IP address, conected to Internet, and also, eth1, with a private IP address, for network with the surfing computers. I have a main class with

Hi, I''m trying to modify the Wondershaper script so achieve the following. 1. Prioritize traffic to the few IP addresses. 2. Everyone else should get a fair amount of bandwidth The problem I am facing is when I run this script is that the bandwidth seems to get halved. I tried to apply this script to a site where the upstream and downstream were fully saturated. I immediately saw

Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)I have eth0 facing the backbone and eth1 facing the LAN. Thanks for your help.These are the commands I run:tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc

Salut lartc (lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl), 18:12:52 kernel HTB init, kernel part version 3.10 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100002 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100003 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100004 is small. Consider r2q change.

Hello, I''m trying to get lossless VoIP traffic over my 3000k/500k ADSL line. Shaping outgoing traffic is no problem: I set total ceil for outgiong device (ppp0) to 450kbit and put VoIP into highest prio class. Even during full upload the voice is clean on the other end. Now I tried to get the same result for incoming data. I attached HTB to eth1 where the incoming voip traffic is

Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it. I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived

hi all, my system with kernel 2.4.16 & 2.4.17( RH-7.2) has netfilter-1.2.4, iproute-ss010803, squid, dns with 4 ether cards.i am trying a simple situation where i want to shape traffic all the interfaces. at present iam using netfilter to allow a few ips, using transparent squid & iproute to limit bandwidth. i feel i must give more bandwidth for my local servers for my office &

hi there, is there any possible way to control traffic in child??? class with selected protocols for example http i try to use this script but its now working in theory: there is root class 1:0 with subclass 1:2 in class 1:2 all ip adresses have their bandwidth limit 1:{iden} and now i try also control bandwith in this class i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit i want 95kbit with burst to 190kbit

Hello all, I am providing broadband service through DVB circuit. I have 4KB uplink and 32KB downlink. I want to share 32KB downlink bandwidth among 192.168.0.0/24 (20 users in this subnet i.e 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.22)subnet where each user will get 2KB to 6KB bandwidth. And from 4KB uplink bandwidth each users will get only 1KB to 2KB bandwidth.

Hello. I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order to improve latency. Here is my config. UPLOAD_RATE="256" UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller) UP70="$[7*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP30="$[3*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP20="$[2*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UPRATE="${UPRATE}kbit" IF="eth2" IPTABLES="iptables -t

I''ve been following the HOWTO, and reading mailing list discussions about throttling bandwidth, and have had some success, but I just want to tie off some loose ends. Essentially what I am wanting to do is to keep our bandwidth usage below 1megabit, because if we go over we get charged for that traffic. I''ve used some of the examples from the HOWTO to limit our bandwidth, but I

If in one time 3 IP adresses using internet. TC script: DEV=eth0 # LAN SERVER_IP=192.168.1.2 # eth0 ip address tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 255 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 384Kbit quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 384Kbit prio 0 quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit

Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in

Hi! Here''s what I want: root class 0010 premium parent class 1000 premium child classes 1xyz best-effort parent class 2000 best-effort child classes 2xyz default class 3000 Here''s how I do it: eth1: DEFAULT=3000 eth1-0010.root: RATE=100Mbit LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000.premium CEIL=352Kbit RATE=352Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1 CEIL=32Kbit RATE=8Kbit

Hi all ! I''m building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem, and i think i''m doing something wrong, but i can''t find what. Please excuse my terrible english, i''m french. >From what i''ve read, tc is the tool i need. I read the documentations, readmes and lartc.org

Lartc readers I have a peculiar problem with shaping and firewalling. My tc rules work great, below is a smaller version: #Root tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 100 #Root Class tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1024kbit quantum 20000 burst 15k #Class for each user tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 32kbit ceil

I''ve set up Traffic Shaping on a Linux Router. Using HTB with SFQ, i''m trying to slow down heavy downloading for 20 subscribers over a 2048 kbit downlink. I''m classifying internet related traffic using iptables marking. bri0 is my local lan bridge, receiving egress traffic destined for subscribers. tc qdisc add dev bri0 root handle 1: htb default 2 tc class add dev

On a router, there is no need for and IMQ because there is always an egress path. For example: Internet -> eth1 -> iptables -> routing -> ... -> egress qdisc -> eth0 -> LAN LAN -> eth0 -> iptables -> routing -> .... -> egress qdisc -> eth1 -> Internet Local Process / Proxy -> routing -> iptables -> egress qdisc -> eth1/eth0 ->

I am using HTB for traffic shaping, my scenario is Eth1 is my local interface and I wan to shape bandwidth for IP 172.16.173.245. Now I want if any request from above IP comes its get 1mb speed and all others get 96kb speed, for this setup I make following script but it does not work. Can anyone help me ? htb script -------------- tc qdisc del dev eth1 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc

I''m admin of 50 clients. Sometimes I upgrading my internet traffic shaping script. I think rules of inetrnet traffic shaping is very important thing! I would like to ask some help from people, who understand something about SQUID ZPH and TC, to aim beter internet traffic shaping scripts. Squid has ZPH suport, becouse its responds to such commands as: zph_tos_local 8 zph_tos_peer 0