similar to: RED/GRED implementation for InBound Traffic Control (from ISP)

Sorry all, this is the missing email that I referred to previously. I inadvertently sent it only to the original poster rather than the list. Sorry for the wasted b/w for those who don''t care... Ed W -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] RED/GRED implementation for InBound Traffic Control (from ISP) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:04:30 +0100 From: Ed Wildgoose

ALL: <<diffserv-gred_10-06>> I have attached the current script that I am using. $TC qdisc add dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred setup DPs 3 default 2 grio $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 1 limit $lim min $minTh max $maxTh avpkt $avgPL burst $bursty bandwidth $netBand probability 0.02 prio 2 $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 2 limit $lim min $minTh max

I ''ve been trynig for a long time now to make HTB and GRED to work togethen. The problem beeing that GRED doesn''t use handles (instead it uses DP:1 DP:2 etc) i can not preperly filter traffic to them. Tomas Graf suggested to use the tc_index index of u32 classifier so dear Sant .. i am currently with the following scripts that works! But when i try to add an HTB before the

Hi, I am trying to get assured forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I am using. The following steps are what I thing is how the script works. My problem is that if I remove the HTB qdisc from the script and have the GREDS parent as the dsmark it works, but when I add the htb as a parent of GRED and DSmark the parent of htb it does not work? Any

Hi All, Just wanted to announce that MyOSS Magazine - Edition 4 (The Penguins Are Coming Home) is now officially hitting the street. This is a community driven project which aims to publish monthly. (Sorry if this is considered as spam). Promoting FLOSS There are more than one way to skin a cat. Hence, there are most certainly more than one way to promote FLOSS. (Free and Libre Open Source

Hi All, Just wanted to announce that MyOSS Magazine - Edition 3 (We''re Edition 3!) is now officially hitting the street. This is a community driven project which aims to publish monthly. (Sorry if this is considered as spam). Securing your Network Connection using OpenSSL OpenSSL is a very important protocol in this day and age. The profilteration of the internet has made this

Hi, I am tring to setup AF on my router using GRED/HTB. I plan to mark and set the DSCP with iptables and the ingress qdisc to set the tc_index for the proper GRED vq(1-12). My question is: Is there a way to allow for priority between the af classes and within the af classes? also would it be possible to to the following: HTB(6Mb) | GRED(1)grio HTB1 (af1) (1MB) GRED(1-3)grio |

I''m successfully using HTB + GRED to shape traffic based on the DSCP field. I would like to strip the DSCP and possibly replace it with normal ToS bits on egress traffic leaving my network. Leaving DSCP set is pointless, and could potentially cause problems with some ISPs that use DSCP internally I suppose. Setting ToS bits would seem ideal as most networks still honor it to varying

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is there any grapical interface for the QoS (Quality of Service) Traffic Control in Linux ? Greetings. - --- Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó carles@descom.es Descom Consulting Telf: +34 965861024 Fax: +34 965861024 http://www.descom.es/ - --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8

Hi, just wondering if this type of configuration would be possible for using AF and EF classes. HTB (6.0M) --GRED 5 (AF1) --HTB(1M) [is it possible to have this with a 1M rate and a 6M ceiling?] --GRED [3 greds using grio] VQ1 -3 --GRED 4 (AF2) --HTB(1M) --GRED VQ1 -3 --GRED 3 (AF3) --HTB(1M)

Hello, We know, VQs are used in Gred to offer different schedulers, in order to make clear what the VQs are, I have read the sch_gred.c in net/sched/. In the function gred_enqueue(), at first it will find the VQ(q) according to the lower four bits of the skb->tc_index, then some parameters of the q is modified, such as q->packetsin and q->bytesin. At last the packet was put into the

Hi i have configured my server with cbq and gred. The problem is that the cbq doesnt drop packets. The cbq is configured at a rate of 500Kbit "qdisc cbq 4: rate 500000bit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 100103048 bytes 73933 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 24000 undertime 0 " The traffic that being generated is more than 5Mbit with the

hi, Is there a way to calculate Gred parameters, given a desired delay (e.g 100ms)? Thanx Ntanzi ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com

Hi, In the GRED queueing discipline of linux traffic control, we can define around 16 Virtual Queues with different RED parameters for each one of these. As far as I think, while applying RED on each of the virtual queues, with the grio option set, quave(the average queue length) of a virtual queue with priority= n is given by the sum of the virtual queues with priority greater than n ... I have

Has anyone ever managed to use GRED and HTB ? Been googling all over the net for hours and did not manage to find any proper implementation. In my case all AF traffic goes into VQ 3 In opalsoft afhtb example traffic goes into VQ 1 & 2 any script will do just fine for me Thanks in advance , Antonio _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

I have managed to dynamically parse the output of commands: tc qdisc ls dev eth0 and tc -s class show dev eth0 Save statistics in an rrd database and display it via a php script. see http://143.233.4.215/graph.php and dload scripts from http://143.233.4.210/qos/ My next step in developing this monitoring software is to somehow manage to create a tree out of tc and then use it to greatly

>Theory is.. You can only shape outbound traffic. Inbound is via tcp windowshaping etc.. In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 65437 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -m mark --mark 0

I want to implement a new queuing discipline for the tool tc. The new queuing discipline would support the application of multiple threads on the same queue with different kinds of traffic. Each kind of packet will have its own drop probability but while calculating the average queue length, the no. of packets in the queue will be equal to the sum of the individual no. of packets(of the different

Hello all, Please could someone help me with this, I have been trying for days to get this to work. I would like to have BE, AF & EF classes with HTB qdisc. I can''t find any scripts online where this has been done. If I enable this filter: #tc filter add dev eth0 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 1 \ #tcindex mask 0xf0 shift 4 pass_on then BE & AF classification seems to be fine but

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:30 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: FW: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: