similar to: tutorial for Julian Anastasov''s patches

Hello, I use Julian Anastasov ''routes'' (to be more specific: static_routes, alt_routes and nf_reroute) patches on a 2.4.32 kernel. On the same host I run IPSec. I have discovered after a few hours of networking problems that, when IPSec is enabled on that patched kernel, inspecting packets with tcpdump while arping-ing a host from a network physically connected to this

With 2.4.28 and Julian Anastasov''s http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.4.27-9.diff patch, I get the following when I attempt to build my kernel. Any ideas? Thanks! gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -fno-unit-at-a-time -nostdinc

Dear List. I try to build multipath connection w/ load balance to internet with two different gateway; My system is RH-8.0 with iproute-2.4.7-7.90.1.rpm and Kernel-2.4.26 (patching with Julian A. patch),and follow guide from http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt, The problem is; when i try to connect to Internet form gateway machine it;s success , but only one interface is

Hello, I wanted to try some multipath setup with Julian''s patches, and when rebooting on the newly patched kernel, without any multipath routes (only one interface up and one default gateway), my SSH connections to the server freeze after a few seconds. I tried with and without bridges (I sometimes have a bridge between a tap device and my eth0) with the same results. When I close

I''m getting the following error/warning at some point in my config script, and I''m not sure which class it is referring to. htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?! I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate limits the bandwidth, so I don''t understand why this

I am using kernel 2.6.9 (gentoo,AMD64 version) + routes-2.6.9-11.diff If compile kernel with gcc 3.4.3, then the similar error comes out: ------------------ net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c: In function `fib_validate_source'': include/net/ip_fib.h:181: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to ''fib_result_table'': function body not available net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:204:

Dear Lists, I have problem regarding multipath connection to internet behind NAT. I use 2.4.26 kernel in RH-9.0 with Julian Anastasov patch, and version iproute2-ss020116 (Fedora RPM package). Dual homing and dead gateway detection work fine as we expected, the problem is , everytime we hit site that have redirect page address (URL no absolute), it''s doesn''t reply. (ex:

when doing somehitng like ip rule add fwmark 3 nat 200.42.75.183 table ppp0 prio 1 (the idea is that packets that match the fwmark 3 change their source address to 200.42.75.183)..it first apply the nat and then routes to table ppp0 right? in such case the, nat, why may be nat not being applyed? cause it doesnt work at all..it goes to that interface but does not nat the src address of the package.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Alex Chekholko <alex at calicolabs.com> wrote: > In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux > box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. > Not sure if this would be the first attempt. Synology seems to bundle glusterfs in some form [1]. Regards, Vijay [1]

FYI this topic has been covered on the Zebra and Quagga lists - hardware processors, memory, NICs, etc - software OS (Linux, *BSD), drivers, etc I''ve been running a couple of Linux routers for about 2 years now, I''m using them as core routers so I bought a couple of rackmount "server" boxes with redundant PSUs and h/w RAID (1) for hotswap disks. I''m using

In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Ben Mabey <ben.mabey at recursionpharma.com> wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in > a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology

Hi We have applied the routing patches from http://www.ssi.bg/%7Eja/#routes. To 2.6.15 this seems to have broken our output natting. Has anyone else experienced this or any advice on how to fix. Is this working on the newer kernel i.e. 2.6.19 ? Any help would be appreciated. -- Tim Haak email: tim@haak.co.uk cel: 0837787100 First love is only a little foolishness and a lot of curiosity,

Hi, I regularly have errors (kernel: dst cache overflow) and crash of a firewall under Linux 2.6.17 and the route patch from Julian Anastasov. With rtstat I see that the route cache size increases regularly without never decreasing. I have this parameters: fw:/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route# grep . * error_burst:1250 error_cost:250 gc_elasticity:15 gc_interval:60 gc_min_interval:0

Hello, I have finished setting up the load balancer with IPROUTE ... also patch the kernel to support DGD and now it''s working fine with the valuable guide at LARTC website, Julian Anastasov, and the kind people in this mailing list. Now I would like to launch a web server and a ftp server to the public but I''m stuck into a problem and really need your help. Currently internal

Can someone tell me what concept I''m missing here. The setup is simple. I have two default routes after ifup operations. I use "ip route del" to remove one, but then decide to add it back. The attempt is refused. Why? # ip route ls 66.95.83.208/28 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 66.95.83.210 65.84.205.96/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 65.84.205.104

Greetings from a newbie! (Well, to this list anyway) I''m having a problem and I hope someone here might be able to help... I am strongly expecting an answer along the lines of "upgrade to v2.4.x", but I would REALLY preffer to avoid that for now... The setup: "Home brewed" v2.2.24 (will patch to v2.2.25 later today) with the DS8 patch applied. Currently

Hello all, I am messing around with iptables, trying to learn how it works so that I can build my self a router/firewall and mabey a VPN. Anyway I tried to use a command on my Desktop CentOS3 machine. "iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -p icmp -j DROP" now the command seems to have went through because I didn't get any errors, but when I go to ping 127.0.0.1 I am getting a response

Hi all iam trying to setup Dual gate using Julian patch DGD, but when i try tp patch to my kernel with fedora iam getting the following eroor can some one suggest me what is wrong or i need a latest patch for fedora [root@linux-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl]# patch -p1 < /root/update/update/routes-2.4.20-9.diff patching file include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h patching file

hi, question. i was reading the howto, and the part about load balancing talk about to providers, well i have one provider and make to dial-modem conection, so i have the same gateway in both (ppp0 and ppp1) but to diferent IP. what do i have to do? just set up the default route to be a multipath route? or do i need to split the access? _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hello all, I need a very simple routing protocol for VPN redundancy. We have several sites and each site has a Linux router and two IPCops each with an ADSL connection to the internet using different ISP''s. I have configured VPN''s between all of the sites for each IPcop on ispA and the same for the IPCops on ispB. This way, if one of the ISP fails, I change the route on the