similar to: load balanced adsl lines

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was

My Internet gateway is using ADSL PPPoE connection with dynamic public IP assigned by ISP. My Internet gateway is Redhat AS3 U2, shorewall 2.0.9 As my ISP provided 4 simultaneous pppoe dailup connection for the same physical adsl line. My linux server can be configured for multiple pppoe connection i.e. ppp0, ppp1, ppp2, ppp3 Is it possible of shorewall to assigned say ppp0''s IP is

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

yes, this is a crazy subject. I have 4 ADSL lines to the same provider, which even have the same gateway. Those lines are connected to the same machine (more crazyness: even connected to the same nic. it works fine, I swear). this machine will serve this conenction to a local net. so, I setup the ifaces correctly, everything works. I add balancing using this command: # ip route replace default

Here''s my situation: I''ve got an Intel machine running a 2.6.9 linux kernel and this box has 4 modems attached to it via a usb to serial port expander. In order to force data down each of the modems, some pretty simple rules are used and they are as follows: iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport $PORT1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport

That could have gone smoother. I had many problems with the NFS install on my firewall then once I got the server back up, mail delivery was broken :- ( I still haven''t gotten ulogd to run under RH9.0 but everything else seems to be working ok... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

Dear R helpers   I have some variables say ABC, DEF, PQR, LMN and XYZ. I am choosing any three varaibles at random at a time for my analysis and name these files as input1.csv, input2.csv and input3.csv. So if I choose variables say ABC, DEF and PQR, I am passing the specifications of these variables to input1.csv, input2.csv and input3.csv respectively.   This means in another case even if I

Hi, I have a PPPoE server running on a linux box that accepts multiple PPPoE sessions from clients. I'd like to bridge each of the sessions together so that it looks like just one interface. Below is a diagram: br0 | ------------------------------- | | | | ppp0 ppp1 eth3 ppp3 I've read that anything can be bridge as long as MTU is the same.

Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add

Hi, I want to be able to specify actions for different classes of traffic in any of these four ways, and I''d like to use only HTB if possible: 1. No guranteed rate, No ceil 2. Guaranteed rate, No ceil 3. No guranteed rate, Ceil specified 4. Guaranteed rate, Ceil specified For types 2, 3 and 4 there can be several classes of each, with different rates and ceilings. 4 is ofcourse easy.

I have a private lan that is connected to the world via 3 dsl lines. I put up a linux box that handles all the dsl lines, lan gateway and all is working well...until...one of the dsl lines goes down. My routing table is: x.x.x.x dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp2 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x

Hí everybody, you have a nice day. I am configuring accounting in shorewall /etc/shorewall/accounting and the traffic between eth0 (local network)1, eth2(local network2) and eth3(local network3) <--> eth1(ip public network), works fine. I make the accounting because y want to control the remote vpn access(pptpd) throught shorewall. Which is the way to control vpn /ip/access in

Hello, [I hope i''m on the lartc mailing list - i''m posting using gmane] I used the "Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO" for doing source routing using iproute2. The documentation would be perfect if the source routing page <url:http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.html> mentionned you may have to turn off spoofing protection on ppp2:

Albi Rebmann wrote: > Hallo, > > sorry to say again, but BindToInterface = interface [experimental] still > does not work here (tinc 1.08). I use SuSE Linux 8.0, 2.4 Kernel. > If I add a missing device I get an error, but I add ppp2 (my external > device) and tinc still listens on 0.0.0.0 > I hope you have an idea how I can bind tinc to only one ip address. Use

Hi Paul, thanks for your answers. > 3 DSL (ppp0,ppp1,ppp2) providers from the same ISP. (which means they have > the same gateway, but different static ISP''s) Do they actually have the same peer address? The connection is pppoe, the gateway is assigned by the ISP and the 3 ADSL connections next hop is to the same Router at the ISP. The gateway is the same for all 3 connections

please, help, i have build vpn server (suse 9 + poptop), i have managed to implement tc htb in ip-up script, but every client has own ppp interface (ppp0, ppp1, ppp2...), and my idea is to share available bandwidth, not to limit connection, how to build root tc rule, when I have more then one interface?... please any one width experiance regards _______________________________________________

Hello, I''m having some trouble with the u32 port match and that is when specifying a mask. tc filter add prio 1 dev ppp1 parent 2:0 protocol ip u32 match ip dst 0.0.0.0/0 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip dport 27015 0xffff flowid 2:4 Using 27015 0xffff works just fine, all packets to dport 27015 go to 2:4 tc filter add prio 1 dev ppp2 parent 2:0 protocol ip u32 match ip dst

Hi, I am trying to get information on out-of-sequence packets being dropped on my load balanced multilink router. Can anyone give me any information on how best to log/track such packets? The router is based on Leaf Bering uClib 2.4 (kernel 2.4.26) The load balancing is being done using teql over a number of gre tunnels, each on a separate ethernet ADSL to a central box where the gre

Hello, how it''s possible to download something from ftp servers without site-to-site transfer enabled? If the data transfer connection will be routed through another outgoing interface than the command connection the server denies the connection. Are there any solutions for instance with ip_conntrack_ftp module or similar? -- Markus Schulz