similar to: filter ingress policy rates by packet marks

Hello one more time, As others seem to already asked without reply, I''m getting lower speed rates than specified via ingress. How do I know. Because I have this in my script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress # Filter intranet traffic, so fit it to intranet speed tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ match ip src $Q_2_HOSTS \ match ip dst

I'm struggling to configuring nut for MGE Pulsar Ellipse 800 (at least Ellipse 800) for two boxes - home firewall and file server. I'm using Debian 4.0 Etch, every one of them. I'm built (after some dangerouse experiments) a testing configuration, where boxes are plugged to line, server playing as a master, firewall as a slave, and UPS connected to an electric heater about 300 Wats (no

Dear all, I'm facing a problem in estimation of glm model with weibull distribution. I run this : eqn0<-formula(fdh~cup1+cup2+cup3+cup4+fin1+vd1+cm2+cm4+milieu+cpro1+cpro2+cpro3a+cpro3b+schef+log(y)) regWeib0<-vglm(eqn0,family=weibull,subset(br, fdh<1)) I have en estimation but there is a message saying that regularity conditions are violated : Message d'avis : In eval(expr,

Hola Elvira. .. y ese comando te ha funcionado???? :-) Un Saludo, Miguel. -----Mensaje original----- De: r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org [mailto:r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org] En nombre de Elvira Ferre Jaén Enviado el: martes, 22 de octubre de 2013 17:58 Para: Jorge Ayuso Rejas CC: R-help-es Asunto: Re: [R-es] Error de markdownToHTML al parsear LATEX Hola, primero de todo muchas

No me ha funcionado, pero muchas gracias Daniel Merino. Al final he solucionado mi problema generando el HTML desde una máquina vertual Windows, como hacía Jorge Ayuso. Gracias a todos por la ayuda :) Elvira. > El 23/10/2013, a las 10:38, <miguel.angel.rodriguez.muinos en sergas.es> escribió: > > Hola Elvira. > > .. y ese comando te ha funcionado???? > :-) > >

I''m having trouble getting ingress policing to work on a bridged device. The bridge contains several interfaces: peth0, vif0.0, vif[1-7]0.1, vif[25].1 . (This is under xen, in case the vif''s didn''t give that away, so peth0 is renamed eth0.) The tc rules I have are: tc qdisc del dev peth0 root tc qdisc del dev peth0 ingress handle ffff: tc qdisc add dev peth0 root

Hello, i try to limit the incoming traffic rate using the ingress qdisc, but it does not work for me. Here is what i have done: # sudo tc qdisc add dev eth1 ingress # tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 172.17.0.101/32 police rate 10kbit buffer 10k drop The ingress qdisc is there: # tc -s qdisc show dev eth1 qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1

I want to limit pps (packets per second) not just bandwidth on the ingress side. I can do this using IP tables but I''m curious if there is a way to do this with TC. Thanks. Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7

Hi there, I am trying to understand our router / firewall, that was configured by another person. It is a Debian GNU/Linux with several configurations with tc and iptables. I have a question about flowid in ingress qdisc. As fas as I know, this qdisc is a dummy one, and flowid is just used with :1 because the traffic have to be redirected to something. However, in our router, there are some

Hello, i''ve found this page (lartc currently down) http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.synflood-protect.html where someone used iptables firewall mark to mark specific packets which will be shaped thru ingress qdisc with a fw filter and rate policy appended. I''ve tried similar this way, but it don''t work. Now i''m belief this could''nt work

Hello list! In am stuck in getting the wondershaper script working. The last line of the script (tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 1800kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1) produces the following error: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Could somebody please give me a hint on how to fix this? Regards, borghart

hi all. i really need help. i need a working example on shaping the ingress per user using tcng without IMQon a mechine which has two interfaces, and acts like a firewall, and NAT for intrenet connection sharing: eth0 is the external facing the Internet. eth1 is the internal towards my LAN/office network. Please i dont want other than tcng code. iptables code i read on some pages seems

hi list, i''m about to setup traffic shaping on a server and got some small questions about the setup. i read alot of docs/howto''s but there are still some questions i''d like to ask. setup on the box is: - external if is ppp0 (dsl) - internal if in eth0 (with ~15 nat''ed boxes) - openvpn at tun1 since all ppl on the lan feel like they have to use p2p i decided

$tc filter add dev $eth parent ffff: \ protocol ip prio 1 \ u32 match ip sport 1863 0xffff \ police rate 124kbit burst 1k drop \ flowid :1 ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Hi I have outgoing speed 128kbit and 5 users. So I want to cat outgoing traffic to 50kbit per user. The best Idea is make HTB queue 10kbit ceil 50kbit but one user (the Donkey one :) ) who using P2P take all the outgoing band. When I make HTB is trafic was very low Donkey doesn''t get any data or take only a little, outgoing traffic was about 1-2K, but In HTB trafic I have full outgoing

Hi, I have set a ingress filter to reduce the inbound traffic on one specific port and also i check the packages (buffer). No i want to test the ingress filter if it is working how i a expect. Which tool (can be windows also) can i use to test the ingress filter (tcpip load generator or something else), and set the packet length size and so on! Thanks, Gernot

Hi, Only for my info: How can it be do via IPTables? Do you have an example or a howto? Thanks Gernot -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Andy Furniss [mailto:andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. April 2005 00:30 An: Grames Gernot Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Betreff: Re: [LARTC] Activate ingress policies on suse ent erpr ise serv er 9 Grames Gernot wrote: > > Hi, >

Hi, We are using kernel 2.4.24, tcng version 10b. I''m trying to do some policing in the ingress queue of the internet device. Until now we had configured some filters dividing traffic into queues, and on these queues the Double Leaky bucket meter was applied. The idea is to have a minimum of bandwidth assigned per class (the cir values) and a maximum (pir values), just as with the

Hello, What''s difference between ingress and egress shaping? When we need to setup ingress shaping(policing) ? Bye

Hi all. Since I move on to 2.6 kernel , filter ingress policy based on nfmark won´t work. Sorry for my english. Simple example: iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 1 ${QDISC_ADD} handle ffff: ingress ${FILTER_ADD} parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1 fw \ police rate 128Kbit burst 10k drop flowid 2:11 # tc -s -d qdisc ls dev eth0 qdisc ingress ffff: ----------------