similar to: Using Token Bucket Filter to simulate a low bandwidth radio link

Hi all! I just started to experiment with bandwidth management using tbf. I have the folowing problems with token understanding: 1) What unit is token? Is "1 token = 1 byte" ? If this is so, then with rate=0.5mbit and HZ=100 the bucket gets filled with 0,64kb (655 tokens) every 10ms? 2) How much tokens are used for one packet (1500)? 3) And token unrelated question. Does

Hi all, I''ve tried to look for this info in previous messages but had no luck. I''ve a 2.4.20 kernel on an Intel arch., all TC is configured and it seems to work. Anyway, I''ve had some troubles in configuring TBF via tc: 1. when I configure burst or minburst to be, say, 1500b, when I peek the configuration with "tc -s qdisc" the answer is that

Hi have set the following tbf tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 0.5mbit \ burst 5kb latency 70ms peakrate 1mbit \ minburst 1540 I want to add a filter so the ip traffic pass from it.. plz help me __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

Hi, Can you please explain to me the difference between rate and peakrate, in conjucture to TBF. IMHO, rate : controls the no. of pkts flowing through the pipe, and peakrate : controls the no. of tokens flowing through the bucket. A funtion(?) of peakrate and mtu is rate. If this is true, why do I need to specify both peakrate and rate? Regards, suraj. __________________________________ Do

I am using the script below to simulate a very low bandwidth connection. I found that I could turn the bandwidth knob down to about 4kbit, but below that I didn''t get any traffic through. I''ve had a look at this generally, but couldn''t find an answer. It doesn''t even seem like the first reply packet gets through. I have tried it with much bigger buffers,

I''m just-so-fresh to the list, so hello everyone. I''m having a realy hard time with setting up very simple bandwidth management. What I am trying to do is setup a 10Mbit interface to send at only 1920kbit to most of the network (to make sure it hardly ever tops 2mbit). I did succeed with the ingress traffic... With egress however, I get very odd results at different speeds. With

Okay, here is a very simple QOS scheduler that delays packets for 2.6. It is good for testing, and might be useful for people who want to put some class of traffic into a "penalty box". Alexey''s tc command is really easy to extend to new disciplines. There is a version which knows about this scheduler at: http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/iproute2-delay.tar.bz2 The

Hi there, I just started playing around with prioritizing traffic. However I do have some questions left :P I am using the following setup: tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf rate 61kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:3 handle 30: sfq I use the mangle table of iptables

I''m trying to fill a token bucket with enough tokens to burst several gigs of data. However, it doesn''t seem to get any higher than ~3.9GB: >tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 1440kbit latency 50ms \ burst 16000000000 >tc qdisc show dev eth0 qdisc tbf 800b: rate 1440Kbit burst 3908420240b lat 2197.8s A smaller attempt of ~1.6 gigs works just fine: >tc qdisc

Hi, Having issues getting a replace command working correctly. The error reported is "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument" which isn''t descriptive or helpful. The command i''m running is: tc qdisc replace dev ppp0 parent 8001:D handle D: tbf rate 5Kbit burst 5kb latency 70ms The idea being to replace an sfq with handle D and hopefully limit a certain user in my

I am trying to create my own Token Bucket Filter. However, I have a problem with packet dropping. Scenario : I got two streams 20KB/s each. I got one bucket with rate 20KB/s I put both streams into this bucket. When buffer is full packets need to be dropped. The problem is that only every other packet needs to be dropped in this scenario. Streams are the same so queue looks like that : S1 |

This patch updates the network emulation packet scheduler. * name changed from delay to netem since it does more than just delay * Catalin''s merged code to do packet reordering * uses a socket queue''s directly rather than layering on qdisc(fifo) because this is used in performance tests. * adds placeholder in API for future enhancements (rate and duplicate).

Hi, I would like to know how to specify the token rate when a tbf qdic is created using tc tool.. Will it be a default value when tbf qdisc is created? This could be a silly question.... im quite new to all these stuff.. but im really interested.. any help will be most appreciated... thanks in advance, sanjeev -- ______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has

If underlying fifo enqueue fails, return the status not 0. Same patch should apply to both 2.6 and 2.4 Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> diff -Nru a/net/sched/sch_delay.c b/net/sched/sch_delay.c --- a/net/sched/sch_delay.c 2004-06-17 15:13:15 -07:00 +++ b/net/sched/sch_delay.c 2004-06-17 15:13:15 -07:00 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ sch->stats.bytes += skb->len;

Hi All, I read the advanced networking howto and find a useful way to shape my adsl link. is says: "tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1500 [...] Change 220kbit to your uplinks *actual* speed, minus a few percent. If you have a really fast modem, raise ''burst'' a bit. " My adsl''s upload brandwidth is about 120 kbits/sec,

Dear Community, sorry for the somewhat dumb question. Maybe someone has any pointer to how to setup the RED queue to mark pakets with ECN. In particular what are appropriate parameter settings for limit, min, max, etc. All my trials end up with either "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument", although the command line (at least for me) looks fine in regard to what is said on the

The delay scheduler dequeue routine has some code cut&pasted from the TBF scheduler that caused a race with E1000 when ring got full. It looks like net schedulers should never be calling netif_queue_stopped because the queue may get unstopped by interrrupt or receive soft irq (NAPI) which races with the dequeue in the transmit scheduler. Also, if requeuing the packet fails, it is probably

Hi. I''m trying to get a traffic shaper like this: ------ VoIP pkts --> | |_| ------ \ | ---O -> ------ / Data pkts --> | ------ In this shaper voip packets are in a different queue than any other kind of packet. I want a data packet to be

On 10/29/2017 03:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:03:49 -0400 > H wrote: > >> I had three characters I was not able to translate and after much >> hair-pulling realized to my surprise that they may be incorrectly drawn in >> Centos 7. > My first guess would be a faulty characters in whatever font you're using. > > Compare it with a working