similar to: Giving high proprity to SIP packets

I want to shape the number of packets a certain class can send to the internet. The size of the packets - and therefore the bytes that are actually send - is not to be taken under considaration. Only that a specific rate of packets can leave for the specific class. I haven''t found a way to do this with any of the qdiscs supplied with the default 2.4.25 kernel (htb, cbq, tbf etc

Hello. Sorry for my poor english =) I have following config for traffic prioritization: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: tbf rate 7000kbit buffer 1600 latency 2msec tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 30: tbf rate 3000kbit buffer 1600 latency 50msec tc qdisc add dev eth1 root

Hello, i have a server (486sx and 16ram). It gives me this error : NETDEVICE WATCHDOG eth1 : ...timeout. I checked in many places for solutions. Even wrote to this mailinglist. But lately i recived information, that too much upload may mix my adsl modem up. So..... my question is how should my script look while the situation is : eth0 - connected to adsl modem and thus to internet eth1 -

Hello, I''m still new in using tc...I wanna ask... 1. what is the difference between classless and classful qdisc?? when I made a qdisc, are I must create both of that qdisc...??? 2. what is the difference beetween three of the classless qdisc in linux redhat 2.4, sfq pfifo and tbf if I using the htb classful qdisc ??? because when I use htb classful qdisc it means I made a qdisc that

Hello, i have a server (486sx and 16ram). My pc is providing internet to 12 other computers. Ethernet cards are realteks 8139 (drivers builtin to the kernel 2.6.8). It gives me this error : NETDEVICE WATCHDOG eth1 : ...timeout. I checked in many places for solutions. Even wrote to this mailinglist. But lately i recived information, that too much upload may mix my adsl modem up. So..... my

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

Hi, I have a cable modem with a bandwidth capped upload rate. I''d like to prioritize packets going outbound according to the TOS header of the IP field. I''ve read through the LARTC Howto several times, and I think I have a good feel for the information it it. It also seems that what I''m trying to do is pretty straight-forward and common. Unfortunately, the HOWTO

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but

I have htb on 486 sx with 16mb ram. Slackware 9.1. Connection : dsl 1Mbit. 486 works as router and trafic shaper for network made of 12 pc''s. it does the job quite well, but when i play Counter-Strike or connect to my 486 via ssh (on lan), i get huge lag every 11-20 sec. when i connect to 486 via ssh and run iptraf program i see all the trafic, and after a while when lag comes the

Hi, Can you please explain to me the difference between rate and peakrate, in conjucture to TBF. IMHO, rate : controls the no. of pkts flowing through the pipe, and peakrate : controls the no. of tokens flowing through the bucket. A funtion(?) of peakrate and mtu is rate. If this is true, why do I need to specify both peakrate and rate? Regards, suraj. __________________________________ Do

Hi All, I''m using HTB to shape traffic, a little like this: tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 htb tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1:0 htb tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action ipt -j MARK --or-mark 0x01000000 tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action

Hi all! I''m new to this list, and hope for some clarity in this matter: I have a home-gateway with linux-2.6.9 and iproute2 (ver:2.6.9). My following tc syntaxes. # eth0 internet scheduleing are: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit burst 6k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 512kbit burst

It only makes a few calls to `tc`: rebecca:~# grep TC /home/jasonb/src/tc-graph.pl $BIN_TC="/sbin/tc"; my @qdisc=`$BIN_TC -d qdisc show dev $DEV`; my @class=`$BIN_TC -d class show dev $DEV`; @filter=`$BIN_TC -d filter show dev $DEV parent $parent`; But something ultimately Oopses: rebecca:~# uname -a Linux rebecca 2.6.6 #1 Thu May 20 17:21:44 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has

Hi I''m completely stuck with the tcng language - I assume there must be some way to arrange queues hierachically like eth1 | TBF | PRIO / \ class class but my attempt (below) produces a "inferno.tc:8: qdisc "tbf" has no classes near "prio"" when run through tcc. dev eth1 { egress { tbf (rate 128kbps, burst 64kb,

hi i am running Debian/GNU Linux with 2.4.26 kernel and radius server my kernel conf looks like this <*> Packet socket [ ] Packet socket: mmapped IO < > Netlink device emulation [*] Network packet filtering (replaces ipchains) [*] Network packet filtering debugging [ ] Socket Filtering <*> Unix domain sockets [*] TCP/IP networking [*] IP: multicasting [*] IP: advanced

Hi! Is there any way to do just plain vanilla TBF (Token Buck Filter) type shaping on a group of ips/networks, not an entire interface. Currently the only way I know how to shape in Linux is to use HTB or CBQ, but both of these need a total rate and then you need to subdivide that into classes. That is not what I want. All I want is Cisco generic traffic shaping style shaping (or similar to how

About the cbq.init. Four machines which traffic to limit in same LAN. Is the samething if I put limiting rules to four different files or all to the same file? Like: DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=64Kbit WEIGHT=6Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.168.0.5 RULE=192.168.0.6 RULE=192.168.0.7 RULE=192.168.0.8 OR four equal files with different IPs, Ids and no PARENT rule? What style of ID numbering you use if

Hi, Im trying to delete an htb class using tc... but i get the following error RTNETLINK ANSWERS: Device or resource busy What could be the problem? I had attached a tbf to it and removed it prior to removing the class.. i tried to delete the class without deleting the qdisc also.. both cases it fails.. Any help regarding this will be most appreciated.. Thanks in advance, Sanjeev R --

Using below configuration multiplied by 3000+ nodes to control bandwidth causes very high kernel cpu usage (99.5%) narrowed it down to the mangle table. Any ideas to do this more efficiently would be appreciated. The mangle table entry (indicated by ***) is sucking all the cpu. I am running RH7.3 kernel 2.4.18-3 and iptables 1.2.5 This setup has worked well for more than 1000 devices but as the