Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "prio"
2004 Oct 21
1
can''t understand howto example
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit burst 6k
tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress
tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \
0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1
why does the download is being sent to class 1 which is limited by uplink ?
why the rate is being mentioned in filter and in class ?
2004 Sep 28
2
Shaping not working
Hi folks,
I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet.
Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client
which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should
have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30
When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30
(except for the traffic defined to be in
2007 Oct 24
1
Low-priority traffic
Hello,
I''m a total tc newbie, and I''m trying to tweak the wondershaper script
(http://lartc.org/wondershaper/) to get a slightly different result.
Excuse me if I will not use the correct technical terms, it''s a whole
new world to me :)
wondershaper.htb creates 3 HTB classes; 1:10 is high prio, 1:20 is bulk
(default), and 1:30 is low priority. The classes are
2005 Mar 30
1
ABOUT "THE ULTIMATE TRAFFIC CONDITIONER"
Dear friends:
I was analizing the HTB script at "The ultimate
traffic conditioner", at the Cookbook, at Lartc. I
have a very basic question:
First, it is defined the root htb qdisc, as expected;
then, it is defined the main (parent) htb class, with
the total uplink as rate, also as expected; then,
they are defined 2 child clases: first of them has
also the total uplink as rate (!)
2005 Jan 09
1
Slow large pings
Hello lartc,
Testing some rules I found out that any rules are slowing down large pings!
For example:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit prio 1 ceil 100Mbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 100Mbit prio 2 ceil 100Mbit
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 \
match ip src 10.10.10.1 \
match ip
2002 Dec 29
8
wondershaper + htb prio + qdisc prio
hello,
a friend of mine have this configuration:
10 x PC -- router/linux/rh8 -- ADSL Modem -- ISP
let''s say that the bandwidth is: 5M and 800K
he does dc++ and counter-strike, so let''s say the UP is full, and the
ping from the counter server is 300ms, the server cut the connection, and
no more game, the player is unhappy. The normal ping is 50ms.
so he thinks to put some
2006 Sep 16
1
Wondershaper Errors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
when I activate wondershaper on my dsl connection (pppoa vc mux), i get
three errors:
# sh -x /usr/sbin/wshaper ppp0
+ /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_downlink
+ DOWNLINK=
+ /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_uplink
+ UPLINK=
+ [ -z ]
+ cat /proc/avalanche/avsar_modem_stats
+ grep Connection Rate
+ awk {printf("%d", $8)}
+
2007 Jun 24
5
Traffic shaping on multiple interfaces
I''m trying to setup traffic shaping on my linux gateway/router.
The system has 3 interfaces:
eth0 - My LAN - with IP address 192.168.0.254
eth1 - The ethernet connection to which my ADSL modem is connected. This
has a 10.25.x.x IP, more on this later. The ADSL link has an upstream of
~1.2mbit.
ppp0 - The PPP connection which is my WAN connection, with a real world IP.
The system acts
2002 Apr 06
0
Clarification required for Prio in CBQ dequeing order
Hi,
I have been modifying the Wonder shaper to include another queue. My
understanding was packets would be de queued to hardware in the following
order:
cbq1 -> sfq10 > sfq20 > sfq30.
Also we only move onto the next queue when the preceding one is empty.
However is seems to be prio xx number that reflects the order packets are
de queued not to what flowid they belong to.
If I
2005 Dec 27
9
2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken?
Hello,
First of all, I already contacted Martin Devera, the developer of HTB, and
he told me to search for help on this mailinglist, thus I am describing
my problems here now...
I am kind of seriously annoyed by QoS as I have been trying for over 3 years
to get it working properly - first I did not understand how it works, then
it seemed not to work, then it was working perfectly for half a
2005 Jun 19
1
question about wonder shaper and htb
Greetings,
My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it
for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd
in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I
understand it, there are 3 classes:
1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit
1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit
1:30 - bulk/default low priority
2005 Apr 05
8
Qos with 2 internet connections problems
Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which
are working great) and we are running NAT.
Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads
from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a
crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it
to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what
2004 May 06
2
imap problems
Hi,
I''m really new to traffic shaping and try to implement the wshaper.htb
script.
I have a linux box that serves as vdr, mldonkey, samba, apache and
mailserver (imap), connected to my LAN with 100mbit. I''m connected to
the inet via adsl with a hardware router/firewall, got 384k downlink 64k
uplink. When I have mldonkey running, imap (via Outlook) gets *very*
slow (mails with
2004 Sep 06
5
HTB problem...
Hi folks.
Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network
using HTB. I have 2 clients:
PC1: 192.168.100.2
PC2: 192.168.100.3
Server:
192.168.100.1
This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet.
It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much
bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has
2006 Nov 20
2
Fwd: Traffic Shaping on a Transparent Bridge not working!
I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box.
This note was originally sent to their maillist,
because the LARTC list appears to have been down
for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded
with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response
to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: drew einhorn
2006 Jan 25
4
tcf_action_destroy destroying
Hi,lartc
I used iproute-060110 with iptables1.3.4 on gentoo 2005r1 kernel 2.6.14-5.
I find some error messages in system logfile:
HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.
HTB: quantum of class 10010 is big. Consider r2q change.
tcf_action_init_1: successfull police
HTB: quantum of class 20001 is big. Consider r2q change.
HTB: quantum of class 20020 is big. Consider
2004 Jan 22
1
Puzzled why my scripts don''t give me the desired result
I am wondering if someone can examine why my set up does not give me the
desired result. What I aim to achieve is to make DNS, ICMP, POP3, HTTP,
SSH, SMTP traffic at a higher priority than FTP serving and Kazza traffic.
However, when the FTP server is busy servicing FTP traffic, web browsing
traffic has dragged to almost unusable.
Abstract of my iptables script follows:-
# Mark traffic on
2004 Jul 19
1
QoS for Voip.
Thanks for the tips Brian,
Actually, I have many sorts of links, line PPOE ADSL, PPPOA ADSL
which a use PPTP over PPOA relay, radio links that connect in the
ethernet interface and cable modems.
To change the SFQ queue size I must recompile de kernel? I think a
saw some messages talking about that.
One other thing, I have the 1:10 a 1:20 class, let''s assume there
is no
2007 Mar 15
1
Problem attaching htb class to a htb qdisc
I''m trying to build a QoS system that would divide the outgoing traffic
into four categories, each one also subdivided into two more categories.
For that I chose a htb root qdisc subdivided into four classes, each of
these classes contains also a htb qdisc. Until these point everything
goes well, but when I try to attach a new class to the leaf htb qdisc a
problem with the sintaxis
2004 May 07
0
Re: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1714 - 5 msgs
Hi
I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in
my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients
are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours).
Any suggestions ?
Regards
Guillermo
Caracas/Venezuela
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote:
> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to
>