similar to: the list is down but I''m working on it

Hi, I have the shown (end of this post) net work configuration. In a "few" words: My Debian Sarge server is connected to a D-Link ADSL Router (DSL-562T). DMZ is enabled for the Debian Sarge IP on the Router. My Linux server has two NIC''s. ethlan = internal Net ethdsl = external -> D-Link My Linux server is configured to make NAT via iptables. Current state -

Hi! I try to copy a lot of little files between a Linux and a Tru64 (I successfully compiled rsync on a tru64, it needed a little cosmetics), but it throws me this error (rsync 2.5.5 on both machines): 779300 files...rsync: error writing 4092 unbuffered bytes - exiting: Broken pipe rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(463) The command line was: rsync -avzP -e ssh

Hi Paul, > From my notes, we decided the easiest, most straightforward way to solve it > was to use sympa. It's highly configurable, and has both a forum and a > mailing list interface, and sets forum replies up in a email-friendly > fashion, and neatly sidesteps the security problems that seem to plague many > of the php-based forum packages at the time. I set aside an

Hi. I have a system with two network cards -- eth0 is a public ip address and eth1 is on an internal network. Now I have all the packet forwards enabled, and there is a route from eth1 to the internal network, but if a computer on the internal network sets his gateway to the box, he can''t traceroute past the box to the internet. There are no iptable rules yet. Here is the routing

Hi, when I try to mount a windows share with a valide kerberos ticket : mount.cifs //auberge.iut.lan/install_autocad /mnt/test/ -o user='IUT\Administrateur',password=toto,sec=krb5i I get this error : Jun 2 12:32:51 brice-deb kernel: fs/cifs/cifs_spnego.c: key description = ver=0x1;host=auberge.iut.lan;ip4=10.31.0.12;sec=krb5;uid=0x0 Jun 2 12:32:51 brice-deb cifs.spnego:

I have a Centos 5.5 box with Mailman installed. A new user will host lists using Mailman, moving from a Sympa based host. Sympa isn't in the repos, does anyone know why? or have any experience moving the archive from Sympa to Mailman? Dave

Hi everyone, There''s a separate database I''m using to get mail group info for our users (Sympa), and I''ve got Rails configured to pull data directly from it via an entry in database.yml The issue we''re having is that the database server in question is behind an internal firewall that has idle timeouts set at 30 minutes. If the connection isn''t used

Hello, is anyone experiencing this ? I have a sympa process (bulk.pl) which triggers this bug: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5914 thread_return+0x232/0x79d() (Not tainted) Hardware name: X8DTU-LN4+ Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6

hello, I'm using dovecot 2.0.16 and i would like to use acl for subfolder. The file dovecot-acl is well written in both folder test and the subfolder test/Test : cat /home/user2/Maildir/.test.Test/dovecot-acl user=user1 ilrws cat /home/user2/Maildir/.test/dovecot-acl user=user1 ilprws When user1 want to list, the folder test is well shown, but not the subfolder test/Test. This is the

Hi David As per the link http://www.llondel.org/ups.shtml & the final testing paragraph. I have set up a Lantech UPS similiar to your write up for your Powersure Proactive and Powersure Personal UPS's On LOW BATT it shuts down OK. BUT as with other many UPS's during the wait period from low batt to start of shutdown ... IE [SHUTDOWNCMD "/sbin/shutdown -h +20"]

hello I'm running debian testing, winth samba as P.D.C, with passdb backend = ldapsam ii samba 3.0.23c-1 a LanManager-like file and printer server fo ii slapd 2.3.25-1 OpenLDAP server (slapd) ii smbldap-tools 0.9.2-3 Scripts to manage Unix and Samba accounts st ii libnss-ldap 251-5 NSS module for using LDAP as a naming servic no libpam_ldap

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110419/a3438017/attachment.pl>

Hi to all. I'm having a problem with the rpm command. I am used to recompile a source rpm with the following command: rpm --rebuild sympa-4.1.2-8.src.rpm The problem is that the result is as following: --rebuild: unknown option I tried to rebuild the rpm database, with --rebuilddb, but nothing does. I have installed CentOS 3.1 (latest) and I also have updated the rpm package to the

No change, just reposting without the "for discussion" tag. I think we should allow this as it seems like a nice coding style for a limited subset of imperative-style code. Rich.

When rewriting the heavily imperative original inspection code, I longed for a ‘return’ statement so I could keep the new code as close as possible to the original. OCaml of course does not have such a statement, but it's relatively simply to implement it in the language. The first patch does so, and the second patch rewrites a sample of the inspection code to use it. Rich.

On 21.2.2019 10.53, Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote: > Hello, > > Am 20.02.2019 um 10:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: >>> On 18 February 2019 09:28 Hajo Locke via dovecot >>> <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> ? ? it seems we need a dovecot developers opinion. May be we hit a >>> bug or cant help

Salut alex, j''utilise ce bout de code pour faire apparaître mon texte dans ma fenêtre: @dou = TextCtrl.new(@s, -1, "", Point.new(10, 70), Size.new(410, 210), TE_RICH | TE_MULTILINE) @dou << "je vais à l''école" le problème c''est que l''encodage ne marche pas.Je ne peut pas mettre l''accentuation.J''ai essayer pas mal de

Sorry for the long descritpion of the problem, I''d like to know If I misunderstand something or if I meet an intrinsic limit of my setup. 217.58.51.162 HDSL eth1 - SRV_XP: 192.168.254.10 eth0: 192.168.254.1 -----+------------------+------- 81.121.243.250 ADSL eth3 - I want to allow incoming pptp request (port 1723) to be forwarded to srv_xp

Peter wrote: > > What confuses me here is why would Red Hat rebase a package so close to > EOL. Now that they have they're stuck with either leaving a severly > broken firefox or providing a fix less than 6 weeks before EOL. I > honestly don't know which way they'll go here but it just seems to me > like it was a very poor decision to rebase firefox in RHEL6 so

Hello, Our ISP provides a firewall and NAT services for our Intranet. However, within the Intranet, there appear to be personal firewalls around some anonymous PCs. The IP addresses of these PCs can be detected by our network monitoring tool. The identity of the user however remains anonymous. Are there any tools that can be used to penetrate the personal firewall and reveal the identity of the