similar to: YAML fails when has_one is null

Hi, I want to use a file resource to write a facts.yaml file for Mcollective. For some reason it won''t provide a valid yaml format if I dump my scope to hash and convert to_yaml. file { "/etc/mcollective/facts.yaml" : owner => root, group => root, mode => 400, loglevel => debug, #content => inline_template("<%= scope.to_hash.reject {

I have set up puppet to create a facts.yaml file for mcollective using the following line: content => inline_template("<%= scope.to_hash.reject { |k,v| k.to_s =~ /(uptime.*|timestamp|.*free|macaddress.*|ipaddress)/ }.to_yaml %>"), However, it is creating a lot of unnecessary changes by reordering the facts in the yaml output as you can see in the diff output between to

Hi, I am trying to save a Mechanize object in database (using a Rails Model). But the save operation throws a TypeError Considering that "agent" is an instance of a Rails Model and "user" is defined as a "text" type in the Model. irb(main):039:0> agent.user = WWW::Mechanize.new #<WWW::Mechanize:0xb71295f0 @follow_meta_refresh=false, @key=nil,

Has anyone else ran into this? debug: /Stage[main]/Mcollective/File[/var/tmp/facts.yaml]/content: Executing ''diff -u /var/tmp/facts.yaml /tmp/puppet-file20121214-13448-933j3r-0'' notice: /Stage[main]/Mcollective/File[/var/tmp/facts.yaml]/content: --- /var/tmp/facts.yaml 2012-12-14 00:53:20.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/puppet-file20121214-13448-933j3r-0 2012-12-14

Hi friends: I tried to convert a model object to yaml(use to_yaml method), and after that, I would like to convert the yaml(string type) back to the model object. But when I use YAML::load to do that, it failed, the return object''s class is Yaml class, not my prior model class.. Please tell me how can I do to convert yaml to an object as the prior model class, or how can I access the

I have a problem with the :include option in find for my has_one :through association. I have Users, Profiles and Customers, all connected to each other with a has_one :through => :membership association like this: class Profile < ActiveRecord::Base #could also be user or customer has_one :membership # i saw an acrticle of Ryan about has_one :through, there this would be has_many, is

I am looking at rails edge source code. I am able to do puts User.find.to_yaml However I am not able to find piece of code where ''def to_yaml'' is. How this to_yaml serialization is working? can fully understand how to_json and to_xml is working but to_yaml beats me. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hello, I''ve come across an issue that I''m sure is a bug when using after_create with a has_one association, but I''m not 100% certain if I''m missing something. This is pretty much exactly the code I''m using. Two simple classes (Account and Contact) and I create the contact after I create an account (via after_create). I''m not passing in a

I''m either missing a step, confused or seeing some odd behavior with ActiveRecord''s serialize feature. When I load an ActiveRecord object from the database, my serialized attribute is a YAML::Object, not the original object. My code is based on an example of this capability in the "Agile Web Dev. w/ Rails" book (p. 196). In create.sql: <code> create table

Hi to everyone, I have the following models: class Attachment < ActiveRecord::Base has_attachment :content_type => [:image, ''application/pdf''], :max_size => 3.megabytes, :path_prefix => ''../private/attachments'', :storage => :file_system, :processor => :rmagick,

Want to load a configuration from a yaml file ala config/database.yml. I am following http://blog.innovativethought.net/2009/01/02/making-configuration-files-with-yaml-revised/ but, I am getting uninitialized constant ActionView::CompiledTemplates::DOMAIN_CONFIG from rails. I''ve documented my code to make this simpler. I''m running Rails 3.0.7 I know isn''t the

While I''m happy to continue talking about the vagaries of Rails deployments, I also need to actually build apps. :) I may have discovered a bit of a problem with :include as it applies to has_one associations. First, let me say that I''m a big fan of :include for reducing the number of SQL calls. There are times when I wish it could go more than 1 step away from the parent

Let''s say I have: A BELONGS_TO B B HAS_ONE A (with :dependent=>:nullify) But this association does not need to exist. In other words, I could have many A''s and B''s that are not associated in this manner. Presently, if I try to delete "B": 1. If B is associated to an "A", this works fine and A.my_B is nullified. 2. If B is NOT associated, I

Hi there, I''m currently building a membership application and I want to be able to select, not just all the memberships, but the most current membership from the database on a per user basis. I have linked the tables as shown:- class Membership < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :payment belongs_to :person end class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :memberships

Hi, I am using attr_accessor attributes in model class and assigning the values to attr_accessor dynamically in controller. And am sending the data object to display in Yaml format. I am getting the response along with changed_attributes but I don''t want changed_attributes details in my response. build Model code class Test < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessor: t_1, t_2, t_3, t_4 end

Hi I''m getting the following error : /Users/nikosd/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2011.02/bin/ruby -e $stdout.sync=true;$stderr.sync=true;load($0=ARGV.shift) /Users/nikosd/.rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2011.02@.../bin/rake test Testing started at 12:00 PM ... (in /Users/nikosd/Work/.../.../...)

I have a question about regarding the use of ''has_one'' in this scenario: Schema: User ---- id first_name last_name UserMessage ---- user_id message_id Message ---- id Assuming business rules dictate that a Message can have at most ONE User (let''s assume a message can be created without a user associated to it), these are my questions: 1) How would I use has_one

I have this in a model: has_one :next, :class_name=>''WorkPart'', :foreign_key=>''next_id'' And it causes this error: compile error /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.13.1/lib/active_record/deprecated_associations.rb:83: void value expression

I''m trying to use ruby''s yaml library to serialise and deserialise some legacy classes. Simply adding a to_yaml_properties() method isn''t sufficient as special methods need to be called to get and set the properties (they''re not stored simply in instance variables that I can access), and I don''t want to change the class any more than I have to.

My apologies if this is a dumb question, but I''ve searched around and haven''t been able to come up with a solution. Is there a way when specifying a has_one association to specify a default value for an object if data is missing in the child table. For instance: class Student has_one :university end if no university is associated to the student in the database, I would