similar to: Traffic shaping : 2.6 better than 2.4

Hi, I''ve released an alpha of ''pyshaper'' - a python prog which simplifies traffic-shaping. Requires python2.2 or later, a 2.4 or later Linux kernel with QoS options compiled in, the iproute2 suite and optionally GeoIP as well. pyshaper periodically netstats the current TCP connections, matches them against your rules, and dynamically calculates/generates/executes

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given class the sum of incoming and outgoing traffic is specified? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is the line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit familiar

Hi I would want to use the patch for squid released by patrick mcHardy, but it requires that squid is located on the same machine that does traffic shaping. My configuration is different: i have the screening HDSL router directly connected to a multi-ethernet firewall and the proxy located on a DMZ box. i would want the firewall doing traffic shaping. Internet |

Hi, Many of traffic shaper products provide shaping based on certain application type. How can we implement shaping of recognized application types? Like FTP can take only 64Kbps irrelevant of weather FTP Server is running on port 21 or 4096. Thanks for your suggestions. -- Sumit _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

I am working on traffic shaping using the nextenso proxy platform(a product of alcatel)on linux platform, I wish to do dynamic traffic shaping means on a fly, is that possible with TCNG?? With Warm Regards, Aruna Baghel "Gratitude can transform common days into thanksgivings, turn routine jobs into joy, and change ordinary opportunities into blessings."

Hi, I''ve managed to create a web based interface to some of the advanced routing capabilities in Linux. Currently it is functional (and pretty, i think :) although far from perfect. I''m looking for people with better programming skills and/or understandings of advanced routing concepts in Linux than I have who''d like to help out with the project. The overall goals

I am trying to mark outbound passive ftp traffic with iptables and shape it to 35KBytes. I am using the following script on the computer that runs the ftp server. It is not working correctly, it seems to limit ALL traffic. Cant file share or anything. Anyone might know what is wrong? It seems that I might need to add a ''lan limit'' so all traffic that is not marked still

I''m looking for a way to shape all traffic on a virtual vlan interface, say eth1.100 to a max of 100mbit. The box is a quagga router with eth0 on the inside and vlan interfaces on the eth1 card to our upstream partners. Each partner has his own vlan on eth1. I tried shaping but was only able to shape outbound traffic on the eth1.100 interface. Inbound shaping was also possible, but

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given client the *sum* of incoming and outgoing traffic is somehow defined? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is your line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit

Hello! I have a small home network and I''d like to use traffic shaping because every time someone uploads a file at full speed, my download speed drops to ~10 KB/s. My connection is 768/128 DSL. I found a script at http://www.knowplace.org/shaper/examples.html $TC qdisc add dev $INTERFACE root handle 1: htb default 60 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 116kbit

Hi I am using traffic shaping on br0 and working nicely. Only problem is when I nat off br0 with a third nic I run into the following problems when traffic shaping: Wondering if anyone has had success with the following layout??? ______br0(eth0,eth1)---------eth1 --- local network | | (public address)

Looking for some advise from the experts out there. We do simple traffice shaping and I''m having trouble figuring out how to shape vpn traffic using a tc filter. The following filter works fine for SSH tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1:0 protocol ip u32 match ip sport 22 0xffff classid 1:10 The following throws and "Illegal match" error when trying to filter GRE traffic. tc

Hello, Sorry for the many Ccs, but I hope to reach all parties involved. I want to do traffic shaping with NAT and I wanted to do it with IFB instead of IMQ [1]. I tried a lot of things but now I am stuck (and maybe confused). The setup: eth0 eth1 WAN/(Internet) <-> Linux Router <-> LAN Linux router: - does NAT for the LANs - runs local processes

Hi guys, I''m new to TC HTB traffic shaping.... I installed it at my first try on my Bearing Leaf Router/Firewall I use the tc -s class show dev eth? To see my output All looks dandy and nice, but it''s figures, of which at current momment looks like French to me, I would like to see exactly what these figures looks like in a GRAPH style... I know I can use MRTG, I do have

Hi! I have successfully set up traffic shaping at our site using your and others howtos. I have a linux firewall (gateway), two leased lines. I shape only the incoming traffix now. I use HTB+SFQ and sort the packets using iptables with the CLASSIFY patch. It works very well. eth1----ISP2-\ eth2----ISP1--LINUX--internal network eth0 My problem is, that i can not shape my VPN (PPTP)

Hello, I have a linux box sitting between (and bridging/firewalling) 2 LAN segments. I''m using Bridge/Netfilter/IMQ/tc(htb) to control (shape) mail/web traffic that traverses the 2 networks. The networks also have some VLAN tagged traffic flying around. My linux box behaves OK with VLAN traffic except that the shaping doesn''t seem to work. Normal http shapes alright but as soon

>In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >YOu''re not doing any other sort of Ingress filters are you?? No >I dont care about destination port. That line was commented. BUT, incoming transfers are being shaped for some reason. >Could this be shaping on the ISP side?? What >happens when the tc rules >are shut off?? No, everything works fine

Hello Is it possible to shape incoming traffic for local linux users ? Iptables can mark packets created from certain pid/uid/gid. Is there a way to do the same for packets _destined_ for some pid/uid/gid so that I can later shape them with IMQ ? Thanks in advance Dimitris Kotsonis _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi, First of all I must say that I''m a newbie in the network adimistration domain. I have the following situation: a network composed of ~10 computers which are connected to the internet through a gateway. The connection speed is 128kbps for the addresses outside my country, and 10mbps for the addresses in my country. I would like to set-up a traffic shaper on the router machine with

Is it possible to dynamically do bandwidh reservation? That is, I want to limit the traffic to 50% for upload and download, but if there aren''t onbound traffic, who is doing a download will get 100% of bandwidh and if there aren''t inbound traffic, who is doing a upload will get 100%, but if there are both inbound and outbount traffic, each one get limited to 50%. I think this