similar to: reverse proxy holding onto port, complicated

Hi, I''ve started a new project that uses Mongrel. It basically lets you defer requests to it until other Mongrels in your (Rails) pool becomes free. Rubyforge project page: http://rubyforge.org/projects/qrp/ gems, tarballs and git repo in case they haven''t hit the mirrors yet: http://bogomips.org/ruby/ I should also add that nginx 0.6.7 or later is required for the

I wonder if it is possible to reduce the memory footprint of a pack of 6 mongrels by about 70 meg. In reading Hongli''s blog about his revisions to Ruby GC (last Monday Matz if he could use Hongli''s work), I was wondering at the size (in RSS) of all the mongrels in a cluster. It has always seemed just too big for my C-binary intuition. Why is so much of the memory of the parent

Hello I'm trying to create compatibility with an automated system that I do not have control over and cannot change. The system was built to connect to individual embedded linux machines that create reverse tunnels back to a server. These tunnels take the form: /bin/ssh -i /home/remote/.ssh/id_rsa -Nnx2TR 22000:127.0.0.1:22 robot at externalhost /bin/ssh -i /home/remote/.ssh/id_rsa -Nnx2TR

While I could figure this out, I''m asking here first to see if anyone has already dealt with/created this. I''m running a mongrel cluster, running 4 mongrels on ports 8001-4. I''m using capistrano to deploy. And I''d like to use monit to check to make sure everything is running nice. I''d like to have monit restart only single mongrels if they fail, and

Hi, It seems that webrick cannot handle too much client and that luke is making mongrel the ''default'' server to use so i wanted to switch to mongrel. Then i read that i cannot use directly mongrel like webrick because it does not speak SSL. So my issue is : how to be sure things stay secure in the way that the proxy should be the one speaking ssl and making client ssl

Hi, I have a setup with apache 2.2.6 proxying requests to a cluster of 5 mongrels. Occassionally, I receive the following error in the logs: [Tue Oct 30 12:00:28 2007] [error] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.1:8013 (127.0.0.1) from 213.205.247.171 () [Tue Oct 30 12:00:28 2007] [error] [client 213.205.247.171] Handler for proxy-server returned

Hi, I''m trying to troubleshoot a 503 error I''m getting, my mongrels are started, mongrel.8000.log says im good to go, yet I get a 503 error trying to access it. Did a ps aux, here''s the result of that http:// pastie.caboo.se/119145, any ideas what i could be doing wrong here? My error log gives me : (61)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to

Hi, On restarting one of my domains, it went into zombie state and failed to restart. Now I see it like this: Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 256 1 r----- 1088916.2 Zombie-test1 111 128 1 ---s-d 195171.2 Issuing "xm shutdown 111" or "xm destroy 111" immediately

Apologies, this may be off-topic. I''ve been wrestling with upload issues and Apache 2.2.2 / mod_proxy_balanacer / mongrel_cluster / Mongrel on Mac OS X Server 10.4.5. Typically the first upload would be fine but the next would make the mongrel instance remain running (ps state = "R") essentially locking up that instance. Apache would then eventually do: [Fri Jun 16 16:45:54

Hi Jochen, On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 00:16, Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > On 02/11/2020 07:07 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote: > > - I have X devices (around 30) and one SSH server > > - Each of them have a unique public key and create one dynamic reverse > > port forwarding on the server > > - All of them connect with the same UNIX user (I don't

I have a test area network that is not routed to the production network because of IP address space re-use between the two networks. I would like the puppetmaster to serve both the production and test area networks. The puppetmaster is on the production network. I understand the puppet to puppetmaster connect to be HTTP using SSL. Can I somehow setup the puppet clients to use an HTTP

Thanks Bill for the answer ! In fact, my application is working well with webrick and also with a single mongrel instance lunched via the command : mongrel_rails start When I check what is the difference in the gem loaded in both cases (mongrel_rails start and mongrel_rails cluster::start) it seems that mongrel_rails cluster::start does not load all the gems that the first command is loading. So

Hi Everyone, So I''m finally going to sit down with a few of the guys and do an even comparison between some stuff proxying to mongrel (we ourselves typically use Big-IP or Zeus to Apache 2.2 to mongrels). If you have other pieces of software that you know about beyond, can you please let me know? Perlbal Pound Pen HA-Proxy Nginx TCPBalance Balance Balance NG TCPFork Apache 2.2

This is probably a really dumb question. I''ve got multiple Rails 3 apps behind a nginx reverse proxy that are working okay. My problem is that most of the hyperlinks are appearing with the application port numbers on them - they work fine, but I was hoping to serve everything up on port 80 so everything looks like the same site. What I was looking for was a setting like

I was able to find some information about this in the list archives, but it ended with a possible patch being submitted for Mongrel. I tried to follow a few of the instructions, but I''m still kind of stuck, since I''m not sure if what I''m seeing is the proper results. I have an application running on a cluster of mongrel servers, which is behind pen, which in turn is

On 25.04.24 17:15, openssh-unix-dev-request at mindrot.org digested: > Subject: how to block brute force attacks on reverse tunnels? > From: Steve Newcomb <srn at coolheads.com> > Date: 25.04.24, 17:14 > > For many years I've been running ssh reverse tunnels on portable Linux, > OpenWRT, Android etc. hosts so they can be accessed from a server whose > IP is stable

By default, Mongrel will delete the HTTP request body and short circuit calling any handlers if a request is interrupted or incomplete. Unfortunately, this breaks any attempt to correctly handle a partial PUT. (BTW, PUT is *way* more efficient for uploads compared to POST which requires a MIME parsing step.) So, about a month ago I wrote up some patches to Mongrel 0.3.18 that allowed

run on startup by default like the other ovirt services --- conf/ovirt-vnc-proxy | 49 ++++++++ installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/ovirt.pp | 1 + ovirt-server.spec.in | 5 + src/vnc-proxy/vnc-proxy.rb | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 conf/ovirt-vnc-proxy

I have 3 mongrels running. They all write to the same development.log is it possible to do something like development_8001.log where 8001 is the mongrel port number THanks Paul -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post

I have a connection to the Internet (on eth1), and over this I also have a PPTP tunnel set up (on ppp0). Temporarily I use the (slower) PPTP tunnel for everything, but I really just have to use it for some specific purposes, which are distinguishable by port. So, I want to direct only some specific ports to ppp0, using eth1 for the rest. I have tried following the instructions on