similar to: how much bandwidth to dedicate?

Hi, I have a mini router that have this feature, "clone MAC address" My ISP doesn''t allow me to connect more than one computer. But, with the "clone MAC address" of the mini router, I can connect up to 5 computers, and my ISP can''t notice that. What do I need to do this "clonning" with my linux box? Thanks, Nico

I tried installing the WonderShaper on my internal link, mostly to get the SFQ installed. I set uplink and downlink to 100000 to match the link speed and changed the bandwidth on the cbq line to 100mbit. This killed transfer speed *to* the box, knocking it from 30-40 Mbps down to about 800 kbps. Commenting out just the ingress control restored the speed. What about the ingress policer would do

christophe.guerin@etud.univ-pau.fr wrote: > > * Enough bandwidth to run the server. If you want to broadcast to 100 > listeners at 24kbps, you'll need about 24kbps*100 = 2,400kbps = 2.4Mbps > of bandwidth. That's about 2 T1 lines worth of bandwidth. Trying to > push 100 128kbps listeners down your 768kbps cable modem isn't going > to work :) It

I have an htb qdisc setup and it is shaping my traffic wonderfully but I''ve just recently started taking a look at the output from the command tc -s class ls dev eth? Looking at the "rate" line I thought to myself..."cool I can use this to graph throughput avg.es without having to worry about the "Sent bytes" rolling over or being lost when the htb qdisc is

Hi, The CBQ config file shud be some thing like this. DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=50Kbit WEIGHT=5Kbit Shall i hardcode the DEVICE BW as 10/100 Mbit or Shall i use any other tool like ethtool for getting this. ethtool gives Speed: 10Mbps If so, how about, if i use some other Interfaces other than eth0, like ppp0 or some other? C''d anybody can give a suggestion over this? thanks

We are running a benchmark that does single threaded 512 KB writes to a LUN on a CLARiiON storage array. The dual Xeon host (Dell 2650) with 4 GB of memory runs RHEL 4U3 We measured the write bandwidth for writes to the block device corresponding to the lun (e.g. /dev/sdb), a file in an ext2 filesystem and to a file in an ext3 file system. Write b/w for 512 KB writes Block device 312 MBps Ext2

I just using around 7 years ago lan card, can the lan card support external 100 Mbps bandwidth on Shorewall ? Thanks _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息 就算你沒有上網，你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你，當你上網時就能立即看到，任何說話都冇走失。 http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk

OS: CentOS 5.0 x86. Hi, I am using CentOS 5.0 at home, ADSL ~16 Mbps/~1 Mbps Internet connection and my ping time to my ISP is 160-170 msec. When downloading something with Firefox, I am getting download speeds of about 100-180 KB/sec (for example when downloading SP2 of XP from MS server). Are the CentOS networking settings OK for this kind of latency, or do I have to change some settings?

FYI for anyone using the dual ethernet ports on a Grandstream BT102. I'm using a BT102 connected to an HP2524 10/100 switch, which has an asterisk box connected directly to it. No VLANs defined or in use. Measured bandwidth: PC -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual throughput measured at 94.1 mbps. PC -> BT102 -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual measured at 8.86 mbps. The

Hi, Any body having idea to find the NIC Capacity / BW (10 / 100 Mbps) ? Whether the interface may be eth0/eth1/ppp0 or some other. Is there any related IOCTL avialable, if so just give the linux-2.4.18 file path. thanks, Srikanth. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I am trying to limit outgoing SMTP traffic to about 14 Mbps and these are the IPFW rules I am using. ${fwcmd} add pipe 1 tcp from 192.168.0.0/24 to any 25 out via dc0 ${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 14Mbit/s I've tried multiple tweaks to the pipe rule and I seem to be missing something. I only get about half the bandwidth I specify. Is this normal behavior? Is there something wrong

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

Dear All, Sorry to trouble again..... After go through www.lartc.org I have implemented the HTB instead of CBQ for the same scenario. Now following files are under /etc/sysconfig/htb directory. eth0 DEFAULT=30 R2Q=10 eth0-2.root RATE=256kbps BURST=25k eth0-2:10.comp1 RATE=120kbps BURST=12k PRIO=0 LEAF=sfq RULE=192.168.200.0/24 eth0-2:20.comp2

Reviewers who have published comparisons of video codecs recently tend not to publish their source video clip, nor encoded video clips.? It might help promote theora if there was a link we could provide to a nice source clip, only one or two minutes long with a mix of action and talking head spots, with several versions of it compressed in theora format; maybe 250 kbps, 500 kbps, 750 kbps, 1 mbps,

A new version of the iproute2 utilities is available to handle the new extensions for 2.6.7. * Based on the last known good version of iproute2 from Alexy * Included most of the vendor patches (except for the stupid ones). * Got rid of lots of the glibc workarounds, I intend this to build and run on 2.6 (and 2.4) only. * Fixed some parsing and formatting bugs. * Added gigabit as a rate.

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2017?04?19? 04:21, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >> +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, >> + struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct napi_struct *napi) >> +{ >> + if

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2017?04?19? 04:21, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >> +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, >> + struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct napi_struct *napi) >> +{ >> + if

>>> Maybe I was wrong, but according to Michael's comment it looks like he >>> want >>> check affinity_hint_set just for speculative tx polling on rx napi >>> instead >>> of disabling it at all. >>> >>> And I'm not convinced this is really needed, driver only provide affinity >>> hint instead of affinity, so it's

>>> Maybe I was wrong, but according to Michael's comment it looks like he >>> want >>> check affinity_hint_set just for speculative tx polling on rx napi >>> instead >>> of disabling it at all. >>> >>> And I'm not convinced this is really needed, driver only provide affinity >>> hint instead of affinity, so it's

Have you experienced this? What's going on when this occurs? What do I need to do to keep it from occurring? Please advise. Thanks. Dec 4 10:18:17 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:19 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Dec 4 10:18:21 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:23 localhost kernel: