similar to: Reviewing Books on ROR

I have not done the upgrade yet. Since this is a production cluster I need to make sure it stays up or schedule some downtime if it doesn't doesn't. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Ziemowit Pierzycki <ziemowit at pierzycki.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >>

Looks like a bug as I see tier-enabled = 0 is an additional entry in the info file in shchhv01. As per the code, this field should be written into the glusterd store if the op-version is >= 30706 . What I am guessing is since we didn't have the commit 33f8703a1 "glusterd: regenerate volfiles on op-version bump up" in 3.8.4 while bumping up the op-version the info and volfiles were

I was attempting the same on a local sandbox and also have the same problem. Current: 3.8.4 Volume Name: shchst01 Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: bcd53e52-cde6-4e58-85f9-71d230b7b0d3 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 4 x 3 = 12 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: shchhv01-sto:/data/brick3/shchst01 Brick2: shchhv02-sto:/data/brick3/shchst01 Brick3:

Yes Atin. I'll take a look. On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like a bug as I see tier-enabled = 0 is an additional entry in the > info file in shchhv01. As per the code, this field should be written into > the glusterd store if the op-version is >= 30706 . What I am guessing is > since we didn't have the commit

Hi R-programmers ! I would like to perform a linear model regressio using the 'lm' function and i don't know how to do it. The data is organised as below: Month ExcessReturn Return STO 8 0.047595875 0.05274292 0.854352503 8 0.016134874 0.049226941 4.399372005 8 -0.000443869 0.004357305 -1.04980297 9 0.002206554 -0.089068828 0.544809429 9 0.021296551 0.003795071

Hi R-programmers ! I would like to perform a linear model regression month by month using the 'lm' function and i don't know how to do it. The data is organised as below: Month ExcessReturn Return STO 8 0.047595875 0.05274292 0.854352503 8 0.016134874 0.049226941 4.399372005 8 -0.000443869 0.004357305 -1.04980297 9 0.002206554 -0.089068828 0.544809429 9 0.021296551

Hello. I'm trying to make some graphics with nationalized labels (pdf for use in LaTeX document). On console (displayed on screen) using all looks ok: ----------------------------------------\/ data<-rnorm(100) hist(data,main='Rozk?ad g?sto?ci punkt?w', xlab='Warto?? na osi y', ylab='Cz?sto?? wyst?powania') -------------------------------------------/\ But

Hello, I am a new comer to llvm framework. I read quite many tutorials but I am still not able to determine whether llvm can be used for my project: implementing a backend for the famous Texas Instruments 59 Calculator (sold from 1977 to 1982). This is not a CPU but it uses a kind of bytecode that is interpreted (see examples in http://ti59compiler.wixsite.com/ti59/t-compiler). It has no stack,

Hi All, I would like to use Kennard-Stone algorithm for splitting a dataset. > mydata <- read.csv(url("http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/binary.csv ")) > library("soil.spec") > ken.sto(mydata,per.n=0.3) Error in ken.sto(mydata, per.n = 0.3) : subscript out of bounds I found that other people run into this problem as well:

Certainly a calculator supports arithmetic :-) The TI 58/59 support things such as 1 3 STO IND 02 which, if memory 02 currently holds "42", will store 13 into memory 42. So, yes, there are pointers. And address arithmetic. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 3/14/2018 8:53 AM, via llvm-dev wrote: >

http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3031344/RSV.Rdata RSV.Rdata I want to split my dataset to training set and test set using kennard-stone(KS) algorithm, it is lucky there is R packages soil.spec to implement it. but when I used it to my dataset, it does not work, who can help me, how reasons is it, below, it is my code, and my data in the attachment.

In there you are almost telling people that security through obscurity is a good way. That might sometimes be true but in this case it could mean that you would be handing passwords and other data out. When you start SSH on port 22 it is done with root privileges because the root user is the only one that can use ports below 1024. Root is the only user that can listen to that port or do

Hi guys, I'm having trouble setting up my file server running Samba 4 (4.0.3). I had no problem joining the domain (also a Samba 4 (4.0.3) with AD) but I can't get the ACL to work properly. I'm sure my settings are wrong and hoping for some help. When I try to set a user permission I get this error: setfacl -m u:administrator:rwx test3.txt setfacl: test3.txt: Malformed access ACL

On 3/14/2018 8:53 AM, via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello, > > I am a new comer to llvm framework. I read quite many tutorials but I am still not able to determine whether llvm can be used for my project: implementing a backend for the famous Texas Instruments 59 Calculator (sold from 1977 to 1982). > > This is not a CPU but it uses a kind of bytecode that is interpreted (see examples in

Hi folks, I see there are two books recommended on the RoR website. As usual I would like some recommendation from users on this matter. I am currently a .NET developer and familiar with a few languages outside of .NET. Which one of these books would be suitable for me to get started with end-to-end development? Or can someone perhaps recommend a different book they found useful? Many thanks,

Dear R-programmer, I wrote an adapted implementation of the Kennard-Stone algorithm for sample selection of multivariate data (R 2.7.1 under MacBook Pro, Processor 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, Memory 2 GB 667 MHZ DDR2 SDRAM). I used for the heart of the script three embedded loops. This makes it especially for huge datasets very slow. For a datamatrix of 1853*1853 and the selection of 556

For the variadic function error with AMD64 abi and windows calling convention on 64bits x86, I find it has been tracked in Bug 20847 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20847) (http://reviews.llvm.org/D1622#inline-9345). Do we still plan to fix it? You know, I meet exactly same va_arg mistake with llvm3.7 when I enable the Uefi firmware (http://www.uefi.org/) build with clang. The ms_abi is

Hi Richard, Thank you for the info. I build my code in Ubuntu-64bits with simply commands: “clang X64.c”, then run “./a.out” to see the output. If I replace my va_list, va_start, va_arg va_end with __builtin_ms_va_list, __builtin_ms_va_start, __builtin_ms_va_arg, __builtin_ms_va_end, my code will build fail in Ubuntu with below message. Do you suggest I should build it in windows and not in

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first