similar to: VPN Routing issues from local IP to Big Internet IPs

Hello all, We have a few aliased Ethernet addresses on our server and if I do not use the Bind statement in the "Global" section then the NMBD seems to try to bind to all of the addresses. We are actually using OpenVPN which make the connections just fine on a 172.16.x.x subnet to "tun0" device. The problem is that Samba does not seem to find the tun0 device and reports

My apologies (again!) for asking about this old, venerable release. The client is upgrading to 4.10 or 4.11 in early December. The AIX server was joined to a functional Windows 2000 domain in 2015. The AD server has since been upgraded to functional Windows Server 2003 sometime since. They have 2 AD servers - primary is Joe, secondary is Jane. Joe has encountered severe Registry issues

Hi all, I have a group of public IPs 80.x.x.209-80.x.x.215. My satellite broadband router has .209 and my Fedora Core 2 running Shorewall firewall has one network card with IP .210 and the other with 172.16.0.1/255.255.0.0. All network PCs have a 172.16.x.x private address. I am new to shorewall and fedora/linux. I would like requests to public IP 80.x.x.211 to be redirected to internal IP

Hi list, We are observing strange behavior of nsd v3.2.9 acting as slave DNS server. The environment is set up as follows: 0. We are using 172.16.0.0/16 subnet; 1. Primary Master server at 172.16.100.114; 2. Slave server at 172.16.100.115. The config file is in /etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf; 3. There may be also other Master servers im the given subnet. Now I want to permit DNS NOTIFY messages to

Perhaps someone with a sharper brain than I can solve this little mystery. I've Googled until I'm blue in the face, read all TFM's I can find, and tried several iptables rule combinations but just can't get the following to work. Here's my challenge: I have a CentOS-5.3 "main" server with a static public IP address running Apache, OpenVPN, and a bunch of other

Hi I have samba domain controller in my network. and recently I have changed the netmask of the network. Then nmbd is not working could you please help me to solve this issue ---------------------------------------------------------------- nmbd -i nmbd version 3.5.6 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010 Unknown parameter encountered: "wide symlinks"

Le 13/05/2020 ? 02:13, Orion Poplawski a ?crit?: > On 5/12/20 2:46 AM, Patrick B?gou wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need some help with NFSv4 setup/tuning. I have a dedicated nfs server >> (2 x E5-2620? 8cores/16 threads each, 64GB RAM, 1x10Gb ethernet and 16x >> 8TB HDD) used by two servers and a small cluster (400 cores). All the >> servers are running CentOS 7, the

Dear List. I try to build multipath connection w/ load balance to internet with two different gateway; My system is RH-8.0 with iproute-2.4.7-7.90.1.rpm and Kernel-2.4.26 (patching with Julian A. patch),and follow guide from http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt, The problem is; when i try to connect to Internet form gateway machine it;s success , but only one interface is

Hi all, I have a Linux box with two connections to the internet over two routers and a private internal network. The linux box does masquerading. internet +----------+ 172.16.0.1 +-------------------+ <---- | Router 1 |-------------------| | +----------+ | 172.16.0.2 | | | eth1

Hi, Below is my Linux firewall network configuration: - eth0 - isp 1, IP: 1.1.1.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth1 - isp 2, IP: 2.2.2.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth2 - lan, IP: 172.16.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 eth3 - dmz, 192.168.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 isp 1 gateway: 1.1.1.9 isp 2 gateway: 2.2.2.9 Below is my iptables rules: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all! I'm stuck. I've got a dovecot IMAP server running (TLS, port 149) on Ubuntu 13.04 server behind a DSL router. The mailserver's IP is 10.0.0.1 When I connect to my mailbox from my intranet-PC (10.0.0.2), everything works as expected. Login OK, acces to all mailboxes is ok, everything. netstat -nt on my email server shows me:

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hello list. I may become crazy without your help. I''m not nubie, but... All worked with 2.4 kernel, but when I have to move to 2.6.8.1 it''s not. I''m using "ip route nat 231.222.222.111 via 172.16.1.13" to substitute inet address 231.222.222.111 on 172.16.1.13 during routing. Look at the output: _____________ myhost log # ip route list table local broadcast

while trying to log on to my smb server via domain I am getting this error "Your computer could not be joined to the domain because the following error has occurred: the credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. I am trying to log on to the linux domain from my windows 2000 box I can log on to the workgroup but not the domain and the domain and workgroup are diffrent.

Hello, today I came to my job and I noticed that apache is not running. When I tried to run it, I learned that port 80 uis already in use. Using netstat -aenpl I tried to learn wha proces is using port 80, but I only leatned this: tcp 0 0 172.16.0.1:80 172.16.0.1:35664 SYN_RECV 0 0 - tcp 0 0 172.16.0.1:80 172.16.0.1:43464 SYN_RECV 0 0 - tcp 0 0 172.16.0.1:80 172.16.0.1:33764 SYN_RECV 0 0 - tcp

Hi I;ve trixbox installed with 2 NICs. One NIC carries the MPLS-VPN traffic (only a 1 MB link without internet for carrying voice to another site) while the other NIC has a connection with public IP for internet services on that machine. the first NIC (eth0) has IP of 172.16.0.1 and is connected to router with WAN IP: 10.18.6.254 , the second IP is 203.234.82.98 (eth1). i want to have the

i am not able to communicate with ip scheme 172.16.x.x but when i change it to 192.168.x.x it works properly any one help me __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

I'm using yum-pull for creating a local yum repo. I have a non-root user that runs the script and the files are stored in that user's home directory. I'm trying to make that directory available with httpd. The user owns all the files and subdirs and the rights on all the files is: -rw-r--r-- I added this to the bottom of httpd.conf and restarted httpd. Alias /repomirror

On 28/12/2015 22:47, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Can you explain what you mean? Not only am I not assuming that, I can > hardly conceive of any situation in which a host will receive traffic > for its own gateway. ... Basic 1:1 NAT ... you have two gateways while you have two ip addresses or one on the interface. Just to illustrate the issue: AWS instance with two interfaces which have

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 17:29:00 +0000, Alex Bligh wrote: > > On 21 Jan 2015, at 15:36, Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Please can OpenSSH provide some way of specifying which shell to use to > > execute commands on a host. > > Using dash as an example of another shell: > > ssh 127.0.0.1 -t dash > > and > >