similar to: routing question

I am trying to find an ATA that will provice IAX2 and g729. I have not had much luck, I am hoping someone here might have some ideas. -- Scott Henderson ============================================================================ Finite Technologies Incorporated 3763 Image Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99504 Phone: 907.339.8085 ext 6101, Fax: 907.333.4482 http://www.finite-tech.com

Hi, Well, I'll try to start at what I think the root of my problems are. When I do a getent group, I only get a list of the BUILTIN groups. BUILTIN+administrators BUILTIN+users But if I do a wbinfo -g, all the AD groups show up. This alone is not the overall problem, but it is creating a problem because I need getent to return the groups for logging different AD groups to different log

Hi everyone, I''m new to tc but I need to use it to set up shaping on a new NAT box. In short: Each user must have their upload limited to 128kbit and downlink limited to 256kbit. Global bandwidth to be limited to 100Mbit Interactive packets to have higher priority 200+ users, so need to match packets fast So far I have managed to get the download limits working. However I need to

Hi I want to block the IP traffic between any 2 hosts on a switched ethernet LAN. Will setting all the possible IP addresses on a linux machine in the LAN do the trick or there is another easier solution? -- Anton Glinkov network administrator _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Hello i was wondering how i can change the IP address information for my Asterisk box, IP addy, Gateway, DNS. I have a smoothwall router that i am using and i am tring to put the Asterisk box on the orange interface so if anyone can help me please i can use it. Thanks alot William Ray -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have a network with RH7.2 (netbois name "server"), Mandrake 8.1 ("Linuxbox"), Smoothwall ("Smoothwall"), WinNT ("di-bosco"), Win 98 ("robertw" & "Nicole") x 2 and Win 2k ("DiBosco2k"). Smoothwall is the DHCP server. Why would it be that all the Windows machines can ping to a netbios name, eg ping server, ping Linuxbox

Hello list! When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: ----- bs1% uname -a FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD 2008 root@bs1.sp34.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500

Hello list, I''m having a little trouble imagining a setup I''ll soon have. I am in the process of getting a routed /28 to my homeLAN. What I want to do is to put a linux box in front of the lan to filter some of the unneeded and potential dangerous ports. Now the box has 2 nics, one for the inside one for the outside. How should I go on to setup those NICs when a) the PCs in

[ Please would anyone replying to this maintain the Cc list here as my dear colleague is not subscribed to this mailing list. ] Hello all, I am trying to track down an oddity with winbindd. We're using samba only to join a given domain -- so the config file is very minimal, as per: [global] workgroup = TEDDYBEARS netbios name = SMOOTHWALL realm = TEDDYBEARS.LOCAL security = ads

Hello, I want to share/split bandwidth on a link with unknown bandwidth. I want to exactly share/split bandwidth (for example : FTP 30% , HTTP 20% or 30% for a group of PCs and so forth.) "Traffic-Control-HOWTO" talk that PRIO scheduler is an ideal match for "Handling a link with a variable (or unknown) bandwidth". But PRIO scheduler can not exactly share/split

Well FWbuilder is NOT easy. The documentation does not match the current GUI. Now the box is locked up. I will have to pull it again, hook it up to a kybd/VGA and reset iptables.... Maybe Shoreline with webmin.... Problem is I want a REAL router/firewall with little work. Both public and private nets have routable addresses. No NATing for me! I just help write the RFC ;) And all the

Hi, I have a problem similar to the previous poster (thread: Virtual network of DomU''s), but apparently not with similar solutions... Situation: - two physical links aggregated to "default0" - dladm create-vlan on default0 with several different vlans - xVM DomU running linux connected to the same vlans when trying to ping the DomU from Dom0, I can see with snoop (in Dom0)

Hey Y'all, I just set up a new old machine on my network. I did a net install of CentOS 6.7 on it replacing an outdated copy of Win XP. Of course I'm now in the throws of configuring the machine to be a useful member of society. [mlapier at peach ~]$ nmap -sn 192.168.15.0/24 Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-08-23 20:12 EDT Nmap scan report for 192.168.15.1 Host is up

On Mon, March 27, 2017 3:58 pm, Mike wrote: > I don't think it's going to give you a web-based firewall configuration > tool. Firewall/router system I use is pfSense: https://pfsense.org/ It has nice web interface for configuration of everything, based on FreeBSD (very slim, lightweight, small footprint). Has a lot what you may want to have in router box, including VPN,... If OP

I have a Smoothwall server on my network and am running three network interfaces off it. 1) local LAN 192.168.0.0 with PCs and an internal dovecot server on 192.168.0.154. 2) internet interface 3) DMZ 192.168.2.0 which has a linux web server 192.168.2.1 on which I want to install a webmail so I can access my email remotely. Originally 192.168.2.1 couldn't see the 192.168.0.0 network but with

On 3/27/2017 10:20 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > That reminded me about Smoothwall I used to use a few years back. > Wasn't pfsense related to Smoothwall, maybe even a fork? smoothwall is linux based. m0n0wall was a BSD firewall that pfSense forked from back in 2004. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

Hello all, I am trying out version 2.3RC3 but it seems it has the same bug as all versions before (including 2.2 KH9 which I used last) When trying to relay an on-demand stream with icecast and also limiting, I always find that icecast counts completely wrong. The first listener is not counted, but icecast connects to the master server, gets the stream and relays. If a second client

Hi, I use CentOS as a firewall/proxy/webserver/fileserver in my small network. As the small-spec machine with CentOS is heavily loaded/used I can't afford downtime. 20 GB, pentium II with only 128 MB RAM. However I want to know the news on 4.5 is it due soon? Can I gain more by running CentOS 3.x range on such an old machine like mine? Will CentOS 5.0 mean you need a minimum of 512 RAM?

Hi, I have a client that is looking for an solution to do bandwidth monitoring and traffic shapping. I would like to use Centos if possible, but I need somthing that has a GUI so they can easily make changes and updates. It would have to be ip based or mac address. What would you suggest. I have looked a Ipcop and smoothwall as solutions so far. Thanks

Greetings, me again. I''m starting to feel miff now. If I have a few vpn tunnels with different tun interfaces. And all this tunnel traffic is coming in on my eth0 interface, it also leave via eth0 again. I would like to share the available bandwidth evenly with tunnel clients. Would applying the bandwidth rule on eth0 with htb & sfq work for sharing the bandwidth or will