similar to: tc philosophy, will this work?

Hello all, this is my first post here. Sorry for my english. Gentoo LAN router, 2.4.26-hardened-r2 There are 2 WAN links, one LAN link. I am doing some iptables/routing/tc magic in my scripts. What''s interesting is marking packets traveling from all IP''s in LAN. Interesting commands are: ------------- for ip in `seq 50`; do $IPTABLES -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth2 -d

What I need to do: shape every user on my LAN to 256Kbit -- class for web trafiic with rate X ceil 256Kbit -- class for other(p2p) traffic with rate 1Kbit ceil 200Kbit This is good because even if they have p2p programs running they will always have fast web surfing. I can do it with bash scripts - one class per ip with 2 children. But I wonder if something like this would work: # class

I was trying to install iproute2-2.2.4. I get an error when i run the makefile. I get a parse error in /usr/include/arpa/inet.h. Can someone help me? Thanks. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

Dear all, I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here have done exactly what i want. Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my eth1 is not restrciting total bandwidth at 100kbps. According to search on google imq is the solution.

Hi folks. Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network using HTB. I have 2 clients: PC1: 192.168.100.2 PC2: 192.168.100.3 Server: 192.168.100.1 This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet. It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has

please, help, i have build vpn server (suse 9 + poptop), i have managed to implement tc htb in ip-up script, but every client has own ppp interface (ppp0, ppp1, ppp2...), and my idea is to share available bandwidth, not to limit connection, how to build root tc rule, when I have more then one interface?... please any one width experiance regards _______________________________________________

Dear list: I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful with anybody who can help me. I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to share between several computers. I have eth0, with a public IP address, conected to Internet, and also, eth1, with a private IP address, for network with the surfing computers. I have a main class with

Hi All, Does anyone know of a way to limit the speed of *individual* TCP sessions, but without placing any overall bandwidth limits, and without requiring an explicit QoS entry for every ip address the machine is communicating with ? The scenario is a mailserver - say you want to limit individual TCP sessions (pop3, smtp etc) to no more than 512Kbit so that an individual session

About the cbq.init. Four machines which traffic to limit in same LAN. Is the samething if I put limiting rules to four different files or all to the same file? Like: DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=64Kbit WEIGHT=6Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.168.0.5 RULE=192.168.0.6 RULE=192.168.0.7 RULE=192.168.0.8 OR four equal files with different IPs, Ids and no PARENT rule? What style of ID numbering you use if

Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and 1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2) [general] priorityjumping=yes With n+101: exten => 1337,1,Dial(SIP/zytek,5,Ttj) exten => 1337,102,Dial(SIP/zytek,${RINGTIME},${OPTIONS}) exten => 1337,n,Hangup -- Executing [1337 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/113-087a3000", "SIP/zytek|5|Ttj") in new stack -- Called zytek

Asterisk 1.4.6 at FreeBSD6.2-RELEASE Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. Is this normal behaviour? How to change this? Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial. -- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-08737000",

Hi! Here''s what I want: root class 0010 premium parent class 1000 premium child classes 1xyz best-effort parent class 2000 best-effort child classes 2xyz default class 3000 Here''s how I do it: eth1: DEFAULT=3000 eth1-0010.root: RATE=100Mbit LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000.premium CEIL=352Kbit RATE=352Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1 CEIL=32Kbit RATE=8Kbit

Me again, another problem. As I said before, I have 2 lines going into "incoming" context. When client calls, I press Flash, client hears music on hold (only on voip line as said in previous post), when I get back and press Flash again to get back to my client I cannon hear him, but he hears me without problems. I have just tested in on the LAN, same situations, happens everytime.

Hi there, i am trying to shape a network for a college dorms... INTERNET---- ETH0--------Nat Box-------ETH1--------LAN I have set up classes of traffic (HTTP, FTP, MAIL, IM, OTHER) and i have assigned a rate for everyone with a HTB qdisc. The limit based in traffic is working flawlessly. However, under every HTB class i have set up a ESFQ queue discipline with hash value set to

I have a block of IP addresses (2048) used for ADSL connections to customers. In order to provide a fair slice of available bandwidth on the contended services I would like to be able to set up some kind of SFQ filter, but using a hash of the destination IP address rather than the the full source and destination ip and port. This would be done at the Internet side gateway for traffic being

FYI, i''ve just created a quick patch adding esfq (Enhanced Stochastic Fairness queueing discipline) for tcng (Traffic Control Next Generation). Patch is located at http://devel.dob.sk/tcng+esfq. Enjoy. Sam

Hello guys I have a subnet with 255 users, which need to share 1 single slow internet connection, so i would like to implement a kind of *fair queuing *on the UPLOAD between them, which means that they all share the connection equally.. The tools that i have available is: A linux box with IPROUTE2,HTB and TC.. I have looked at some examples, and my first idea was to make 255 entries in

Hey list I have almost gotten my shaping setup up and running as planned. The last barrier seems to be tcp overshooting availible bandwidth when its starting a transfer, and thereby bursting the line, so ping rises for a moment. At least this is my best guess at the problem :) There is a possibility that its just plain old traffic being bursty for some reason.. I am using bittorrent to test this,