similar to: pyshaper

Hi, I''ve released an alpha of ''pyshaper'' - a python prog which simplifies traffic-shaping. Requires python2.2 or later, a 2.4 or later Linux kernel with QoS options compiled in, the iproute2 suite and optionally GeoIP as well. pyshaper periodically netstats the current TCP connections, matches them against your rules, and dynamically calculates/generates/executes

Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K

Hi, I am trying to figure out how to shape the following marked packets and limit them to a speed on 30KBytes. I have read the documentation but I am unsue of what to do. iptables -t mangle -A FTP-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 Mark _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc

>In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >YOu''re not doing any other sort of Ingress filters are you?? No >I dont care about destination port. That line was commented. BUT, incoming transfers are being shaped for some reason. >Could this be shaping on the ISP side?? What >happens when the tc rules >are shut off?? No, everything works fine

Hi, I am using the following script to limit my outbound traffic. This scipt runs on a box behind my firewall. It limits my outbound passive ftp traffic to 39K perfectly....just like i want. However, i just noticed that it is also limiting uploads coming to my server. Is there something I can change to make it not limit uploads to my server? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the

>Theory is.. You can only shape outbound traffic. Inbound is via tcp windowshaping etc.. In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 65437 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -m mark --mark 0

I am trying to mark outbound passive ftp traffic with iptables and shape it to 35KBytes. I am using the following script on the computer that runs the ftp server. It is not working correctly, it seems to limit ALL traffic. Cant file share or anything. Anyone might know what is wrong? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the outbound passive ftp packets on ports 50000-51000

Well it appears i have no clue what im doing. I thought i had the below script working to shape outbound ftp traffic....however, it is shaping inbound traffic too. I have NO clue why. Please comment if anyone has any ideas why this doesnt work. I want to shape only outbound ftp traffic and not inbound or lan traffic. #!/bin/bash #shaping passive and active outbound ftp traffic on an

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given class the sum of incoming and outgoing traffic is specified? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is the line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit familiar

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Friday, October 03, 2003, 8:44:37 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to lrmdn>

I have been reading lartc.org for the past few days and am a bit overwhelemed by the possibilities and configurations that are possible. I am still trying to process all of this to try and understand what I need to do in my configuration, and have tried a few things to no avail. I currently have a webserver that is completely flooding our link, so I need to find a way to deal with this quickly.

Will the following rules work to mark and shape OUTBOUND ftp speed (passive ftp ports 50000-60000) on my linux server? I want to be able to run these commands on the actual computer that is running the ftp server. iptables -t mangle -N MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:60000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc

Hi, I notice that if two or more existing connections match an ingress policing filter, the input bandwidth does not get evenly divided up between the n connections. Kinda like litters of baby animals, where the stronger babies get more access to the mothers teats and grow up bigger and faster than their siblings. The only workaround that''s working for me is to set explicit ingress

Hi I would want to use the patch for squid released by patrick mcHardy, but it requires that squid is located on the same machine that does traffic shaping. My configuration is different: i have the screening HDSL router directly connected to a multi-ethernet firewall and the proxy located on a DMZ box. i would want the firewall doing traffic shaping. Internet |

I am successfully running ingress (IMQ) and egress (HTB) shaping on a bridge. Is there any way to combine and share the bandwidth between ingress and egress? Example: I have set up www service for egress at 128 KB and ingress at 256 KB. The shaping on them works fine separately. However, I want to create a single virtual pipe for www traffic and limit both ingress and egress combined to 256 KB.

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but

Hello. I have got strange problem with tc utility (iproute2-ss001007) on linux 2.4.18. No matter what rules i am going to test, the resul of ''tc class ls/show'' is always the same : ATSLite ()# tc -s class ls dev eth1 do_page_fault() #2: sending SIGSEGV to tc for illegal read access from 00000000 (epc == 00000000, ra == 00408750) Segmentation fault tc -s qdisc ls , tc -s filter

Hi, Many of traffic shaper products provide shaping based on certain application type. How can we implement shaping of recognized application types? Like FTP can take only 64Kbps irrelevant of weather FTP Server is running on port 21 or 4096. Thanks for your suggestions. -- Sumit _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

I am working on traffic shaping using the nextenso proxy platform(a product of alcatel)on linux platform, I wish to do dynamic traffic shaping means on a fly, is that possible with TCNG?? With Warm Regards, Aruna Baghel "Gratitude can transform common days into thanksgivings, turn routine jobs into joy, and change ordinary opportunities into blessings."