similar to: mark & owner for local connections

I''m trying to run some specs on my Mac OS/Leopard machine (10.5.5) but rubygems won''t allow it: $ spec spec/models/my_spec.rb Rails requires RubyGems >= 0.9.4 (you have 0.9.3). Please `gem update --system` and try again. ...but I already have the latest & greatest installed: $ gem search --local rubygem *** LOCAL GEMS *** rubygems-update (1.2.0, 0.9.5) Tue Sep 16

Hello there, I was hoping that maybe one of you guys could help me out with a problem I'm experiencing with tinc1.0pre7. First, I'll start with my configuration, after that I'll explain my problem. Background ---------- This is a simple, client-server situation on a private network. Both machines run the same Debian Woody 3.0 testing installation and both have identical packages

Hi Ivo and Guus, We are writing a book on building VPNs for Linux and a part of it describes tinc. I wanted to make sure that your opinion, as tinc authors and developers, is reflected. First, let me ask a couple of technical questions. 1. If there are two hosts, foo and bar, that are to be connected via tinc, and each host should only have _one_ IP address (i.e. nmask is /32), would the

Hi everyone! I have the following requirement: I need to connect a set of Docker containers to a KVM. The containers shall be isolated in a way that they cannot communicate to each other without going through the KVM, which will act as router/firewall. For this, I thought about the following simple setup (as opposed to a more complex one involving a bridge with vlan_filtering and a seperate VLAN

I have been delighted by tinc. Building a mesh like I need would have been horrible in OpenVPN. tinc makes it easy. I decided to share a workaround for a problem that's been vexing me. Either I'm being dumb (and can do this better with a hint) or this is something others might need. I've been moving a bunch of services from our university to Amazon (EC2). To do this, I bring

Hello list, Please don''t shoot me. I know I''m doing something with bonding that bonding wasn''t made for. I just want to give it a try. I want a simple mechanism to have a failover on a 24Mbit line to a 2Mbit line in case the 24Mbit line goes down. Between A and B there are two lines: a 24Mbit and a 2Mbit. I use two OpenVPN tunnels with tap devices: +-- tap0 (A)---

Hi Tinc Groups again, Now i can set syslog. But my problem still the same. When i check Tap0 configure. I know idea what's wrong that i set. I set up tap follow these. ifconfig tap0 hw ether fe:fd:00:00:00:00 ifconfig tap0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig tap0 -arp But i notice in my routing table have 2 myvpn. Like these, myvpn * 255.0.0.0

Hey all, I'm trying to use tinc 1.0.26 from Homebrew on Mac OS X 10.10.5, and having some trouble. Is anyone successfully doing this? Here's my config: $ sudo cat /etc/tinc/robotvpn/tinc.conf Name = elendur Mode = switch AddressFamily = ipv4 Interface = tincdev0 Compression = 1 ConnectTo = robot_ph_cpe22_04 And here's the invocation: $ sudo tincd -D -c /etc/tinc/robotvpn -d tincd

Hi Maxim, I'm having the same result, though I got some more output with debug level 5; it's definitely failing to create the specified tincdev0 network device. Is there something I need to change on OS X to enable that? See: $ sudo tincd -D -c /etc/tinc/robotvpn -d tincd 1.0.26 (Nov 2 2015 06:12:50) starting, debug level 1 /dev/tap0 is a Generic BSD tap device ifconfig: interface

I have succeeded in getting two tinc1.0pre3 hosts to connect, but I can't ping one from the other. I can ping the local tap interfaces. tcpdump shows that icmp echo requests are received by the other host, but no replies are sent. The two hosts are North and South. It is the same pinging North to South and South to North. The hosts are configured as follows: South: Debian 2.2

Hello, I successfully set up a tunnel with tinc using the tun interface. however I need a tap device, because I need to run the OLSR routing protocol on the tunnel and if I use the tun mode OLSR will just skip the interface. (It is a well known thing, I had this issue before also when using OpenVPN in the past). The problem is that I cannot make tinc use a tap device. I created the tap0

On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, David Summers wrote: > Thanks for the great software package! The question I have is this: Thank you :) > My goal is to set up a triangle topology VPN between three sites and run > OSPF routing on all the sites so that if a link goes down between any two > sites the OSPF routing will reroute the packets that used to go between > the sites A <-> B to A

inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager Greetings! I encounter a problem about the network when using virt-manager to create and run a VM. when I want to establish a network bridge for the guest OS, I generally use two kinds of ways described as fellow : First method : create a bridge with the help of linux commad: brctl, or Second method : using

Hi Maxim, Not much to it: avahi-autoipd -D $INTERFACE # ifconfig $INTERFACE 169.254.45.23 netmask 255.255.0.0 up ip route add 172.20.0.0/16 dev $INTERFACE Mac OS X doesn't have "ip" by default, so I also installed the Homebrew package "iproute2mac", which provides an emulation of "ip" on top of the legacy ifconfig/route calls. The commented-out ifconfig

Hi, I have a few questions about the inner workings of netfilter (a graphical layout of my network setup @ https://aequorin.homeunix.net:62389/local/media/network-graph.png) 1) These are the syslog entries for some simple connection tests. Shorewall/netfilter has been set to record all stateful connections SSH is recognized as phys(eth0) -> $FW traffic. This is because PHYSIN is

Here is the scenario: I have one server with kernel 2.4.24 with a bridge br0 made of 2 interfaces, eth0 and tap0 (the last is an OpenVPN tunnel), and one remote computer connetting through tap0. If I assign a static IP to the remote computer, the bridge works perfecly (so I think the problem is not OpenVPN-related). If I start a DHCPd on the server and I configure the remote client to get the

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

Hello all, I subscribed newly to this list, since I got an bridging problem after an upgrade from Debian etch to Debian lenny (before everything worked fine). The situation is as follows: # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000347729835 no eth0 tap0 tap0

Ah, fantastic. With the following config I get a usable tap0: $ sudo cat /etc/tinc/robotvpn/tinc.conf Name = elendur Mode = switch AddressFamily = ipv4 Device = /dev/tap0 Compression = 1 ConnectTo = robot_ph_cpe22_04 Still need to figure out the Avahi side of things for name resolution, but thanks all! On 26 February 2016 at 11:04, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Thu,

Hello, I have been using the bridging facilities provided by Linux (vanilla 2.6.7 SMP with UML skas host patch applied) to bridge a regular physical ethernet network (on interface eth0) with a virtual network (on interface tap0, cf uml_switch, http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/networking.html). A couple of virtual machines (run using user-mode linux, a tool that enables you to run linux