similar to: Simple question... where to find last stable version of HTB

hi i ve seen one of your replies here and i saw that you receomend 2 modifications in the kernel files in order to improve htb. first in pkt_sched.h, changing PSCHED_JIFFIES to PSCHED_CPU. and then, sch_htb.c, changing HYSTERESIS from 1 to 0. is it that simple? i mean i just change these here variables and i get better results? i ve done a search and found the first file in 3 locations. where

Hi again, sorry to be such a bother. I got my setup to work with kernel 2.6.8.1, however the two machines where I need to implement the shaping are running a 2.4.27 kernel. I have applied the infamous June patch (htbfair.diff) already, and recompiled the modules. And I am using the tc that comes with htb3.6-020525.tgz. While I can see the packets going into the right class, it does not

Hello good day to all ... this is my setup 1 Linux Wireless Access Point, connected are 4 wireless gateway in which i needed to apply shaping ... ok here is the weird part... clients on each gateway download files from the Acess Point ... a 500 mb file through ftp on gateway 1 which is up to 64 kbps ... the result is from 60-64 kbps speed which is fine ... on gateway 2 which is 128 kbps ... the

>Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far. > >I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and >while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to >know more about packets than I ever wanted to know. > >I have two university buildings with a 1mb connection to the Internet. The >two buildings (on either side of town) are

Hey, fellow LART controlllers, I''d like to ask if someome has a real esfq experience with HTB class hierarchy and esfq qdiscs. Lets say that I want to unite the connections to 10 client PCs with u32 or fw filters (doesn''t matter which one in fact) into one HTB class with esfq qdisc at the end. Did anyone tried it, and more important, did it worked the way it is supposed to? As

During my tests I''m starting to feel stupid :). Traffic shaping works quite on its own. System: RedHat 7.3, RedHat kernel 2.4.18-18.7.xsmp, HTB version 3.6, interfaces eth0 and eth1 are acting as bridge br0. If TCP shaping almost works, it just exceeds limits UDP is not shaped. Traffic flows PC=>eth0=>eth1=>PC. Statistics shown is for just UDP traffic (1mbit of small udp

Hello everyone: As it is known, when you limit uplink bandwidth it usually gets downlink bandwidth to a lower value. I just want to know what is the optimal configuration for eth1 and imq0 according to some variables of tc(HTB), txqueuelen, mtu, etc. to make these packet flows less independent on an ethernet based network. Thank you in advance. -Diego

Hi everybody, I''ve got a little problem when adding HTB support to my SUSE 8.1 by patching its kernel 2.4.19. After i patch kernel getting some errors, the HTB kernel option shows up but when i make modules it finds something wrong with the sch_htb.o module. Could somebody give me a hand on this? Thanks in advance. I get this information when patching (patch -p1 <

I''ve got a linux (2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.centos.plus) router doing pppoe termination and HTB rate limiting. the number of connections has grown quite a bit in the last few months, and I''m now getting a: HTB tree is too deep message on the monitor. where is the setting for max depth?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I''m absolutely new to tc and found The Ultimate Traffic Conditioner to be exactly what I wanted as a starting point. Now the script doesn''t behave as I expected though, which applies to both the CBQ and HTB versions, the latter of which being my preference. The only changes made to the script are these assignments:

Hello Lartc''s users, This is my first contact. I''m trying to implement a new queue discipline based on bfifo schedule. I search on internet but there are some problem(s) that I don''t Know how to solve them and that''s why I''m here asking for your help. Well, These were my steps for the implementation: - Put the new qdisc routine

Hi again, I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I see that the main site is down, and only has kernel 2.6.4 patches. Is ESFQ maintained? If so, where can I find patches for 2.6.10? Thanks, -justin _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I am trying to install a proprietary qdisc made for research, it is not publically released yet, however its been used several times so i know it works. The files included are: q_xcp.c: static int xcp_parse_opt() static int xcp_print_opt() static int xcp_print_xstats() struct qdisc_util xcp_util = { "NULL", "xcp" ..... }; sch_xcp.c: static int

I''m successfully using HTB + GRED to shape traffic based on the DSCP field. I would like to strip the DSCP and possibly replace it with normal ToS bits on egress traffic leaving my network. Leaving DSCP set is pointless, and could potentially cause problems with some ISPs that use DSCP internally I suppose. Setting ToS bits would seem ideal as most networks still honor it to varying

> It seems that the official place to grab the source for iproute2 is > http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/ but there are only > sources for 2.2 and 2.6, where are the ones for 2.4? Well I got mine from http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/ but I didn''t even know about those 2.6 ones... I''m using the latest 2.4.7 with my 2.6.5

Hello Everybody, I am trying to install thz HTB queue on my Debian Woody. I compiled a 2.6.9 Kernel with the good configuration for HTB. The kernel is booting correctly but I can''t use HTB queue with tc. I have this error message. gatekeeper:~# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 90 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I have check my logs and found this message : Apr 10

Hi. I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can''t set mpu (minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ. I''ve just noticed that there is a patch on devik''s site which does mpu and overhead. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 - overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.

I know there is that handy patch available to very efficiently use ATM bandwidth, but I was wondering what the best values to use with a non-patched iproute2 would be. Anyone here care to check my logic in coming up with these numbers and perhaps suggest better values? My transmit speed is 768kbps per ADSL line (I have two). This is the HTB shaping I do on the interface (logic used for this

Hello, Could you tell me how did you solve your problem? I have exactly the same problem but with this configuration: - linux 2.4.20 kernel, HTB option checked - iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz installed, which is the latest version I found at ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/ip-routing/, except for "try" or "do not use" versions. I guess I do not need patching iproute2 and

Hi all, I am trying to solve a tiny problem that is trivial to solve using dummynet (FreeBSD). I just want to add a delay of 50ms to each outgoing packet from an interface. This is to simulate a large pool of multiple modem users so I also need to add b/w limits etc (which seems to be easy to do). From the mailing list I could fine 2 qdiscs that can simulate latency : "delay" &