similar to: HTB 2.6.8 works 2.4.27 does not!

>Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far. > >I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and >while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to >know more about packets than I ever wanted to know. > >I have two university buildings with a 1mb connection to the Internet. The >two buildings (on either side of town) are

Hi folks, I have the two firewalls (Slackware current) in differnt cities connected via OpenVPN. I can ping the network behind server firewall from client firewall server. But how to route/iptable network traffic from the network behind client firewall to see the netwrok behind server firewall? Thank you Remus

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2

Hey, fellow LART controlllers, I''d like to ask if someome has a real esfq experience with HTB class hierarchy and esfq qdiscs. Lets say that I want to unite the connections to 10 client PCs with u32 or fw filters (doesn''t matter which one in fact) into one HTB class with esfq qdisc at the end. Did anyone tried it, and more important, did it worked the way it is supposed to? As

Hi! Using samba-3.0.11 or 3.0.11rc1 on RH9 Win Clients are XP SP2 I have a problem with sharing an ACCESS2000 mdb file on a samba share. The first user can open the file without any trouble. The next user (or the same user again) has to wait a timed 4 minutes before the database opens for him. I have tried a number of various locking options (oplocks = no, veto oplocks file = *\.mdb, even

hi i ve seen one of your replies here and i saw that you receomend 2 modifications in the kernel files in order to improve htb. first in pkt_sched.h, changing PSCHED_JIFFIES to PSCHED_CPU. and then, sch_htb.c, changing HYSTERESIS from 1 to 0. is it that simple? i mean i just change these here variables and i get better results? i ve done a search and found the first file in 3 locations. where

Hi, New to traffic shaping I would like to make some tests. It''s for a production server (fw), using 2.4.27 kernel. Something is not clear to me about HTB... is the last stable version included in the 2.4.27 kernel and iproute2 (iproute2-2.6.8-040823.tar.bz2) ? Are there special patches to apply ? EC. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

(i sent the same message from another email acount, that isn''t memberlist. sorry) Hi Everyone..!! i''m beginner in tc with htb, i''m use to limit public, and nat ip clients, i''m to add to one of my server and get this error: > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 Unknown qdisc "htb", hence option "default" is unparsable

During my tests I''m starting to feel stupid :). Traffic shaping works quite on its own. System: RedHat 7.3, RedHat kernel 2.4.18-18.7.xsmp, HTB version 3.6, interfaces eth0 and eth1 are acting as bridge br0. If TCP shaping almost works, it just exceeds limits UDP is not shaped. Traffic flows PC=>eth0=>eth1=>PC. Statistics shown is for just UDP traffic (1mbit of small udp

Hi! I have just started with traffic shaping, and after hours of reading websites, man pages asf. I am still stumped at one problem I have. The interface eth0 is attached to the outside world, and I have an openvpn tunnel to another part of the organization using eth0 and port 5001. The idea was that all traffic going through the tunnel would have top priority and the rest share

Hello good day to all ... this is my setup 1 Linux Wireless Access Point, connected are 4 wireless gateway in which i needed to apply shaping ... ok here is the weird part... clients on each gateway download files from the Acess Point ... a 500 mb file through ftp on gateway 1 which is up to 64 kbps ... the result is from 60-64 kbps speed which is fine ... on gateway 2 which is 128 kbps ... the

Hello everyone: As it is known, when you limit uplink bandwidth it usually gets downlink bandwidth to a lower value. I just want to know what is the optimal configuration for eth1 and imq0 according to some variables of tc(HTB), txqueuelen, mtu, etc. to make these packet flows less independent on an ethernet based network. Thank you in advance. -Diego

A question about the tc binary and diff file that are included in htb3.6-020525.tgz. I can''t seem to patch tc in the source tree, and that has made me hesitate to alternatively substitute the native /usr/sbin/tc for the binary supplied with the patch materials. I''m running kernel 2.4.19-r9, and when I run xingu:/usr/src/linux #patch -p1 --dry-run < ../htb3.6.tc.diff the

Hi! I have a curious problem. I updated my Fedora Core 1 box yesterday from samba-3.0.2 to samba-3.0.6. All the packages that were suggested by yum. I have the box join an NT4 Domain, and while yesterday before the update a smbstatus would list the users as CENTRUM+Username (CENTRUM is my NT Domain) today it refuses to do so, and any shares apart from the public ones are not available any

I´m shaping with htb with a kernel 2.4.25 compiled with PSCHED_CPU. What i´m noticing (in mrtg) is that traffic coming in to eth0 (internet side) is much bigger than eth1(Lan side). I think this is due to packets being dropped right? In this case, is there any way to avoid this? because right now traffic coming from the router is being wasted right? This is the output of tc: tc -s class show

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I''m absolutely new to tc and found The Ultimate Traffic Conditioner to be exactly what I wanted as a starting point. Now the script doesn''t behave as I expected though, which applies to both the CBQ and HTB versions, the latter of which being my preference. The only changes made to the script are these assignments:

I downloaded iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I did patched tc with the htb3.6_tc.diff from htb3.6-020525.tgz and when I try to use a htb script I get just errors. I did not patch the kernel, since I use kernel 2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is something else wrong? RTNETLINK

This version supports: * changes ''tc'' for latest netem * hfsc/sc patch from Patrick * packet classification action from Jamal * copies of critical tc/netlink API headers so the command can be built on older systems. Only auto-configuration left is ATM. The versioning scheme is to label the highest version of kernel used. It should build and run on older systems as well,

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. |----| eth0|------|eth2 |-----| | B |------|___A__|------| D | |____| |eth1 |_____| __|__ | C | |____| A:three NIC was bind to br0:172.16.6.235/24 B:172.16.6.3/24 D:172.16.6.4/24 C:172.16.6.2/24 htb was used to control traffic on A stuctrul is like that(default is 1:20):

Hi I am using samba 3.0.7-2 on my FC1 box as a PDC with a backend of tdbsam and I would like to set up a BDC for the domain as well. The big samba book tells me it can be done with tdbsam, but is wary about the machine passwords changing, thus breaking the replication done with rsync. I don't have the time right now to get into an ldap backend, so I was wondering if there is a way to