similar to: Qdisc statistics project

Hello! I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps. I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational. I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for

Hi I tryed to use a htb qdisc/class on top of another htb qdisc/class as you can see bellow: #!/bin/bash tc="/sbin/tc" $tc qdisc del dev eth0 root $tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 40 $tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit burst 15k $tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50Mbit burst 15k $tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid

Hello, I''ve just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the imq usage example on the linuximq.net site: It was something like this: tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5 tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 256kbit

Hi all! I have a problem setting up HTB on my home network. I have a network: 192.168.1.0/24 and I want to limit the download to 200 KB to every IP from my city ( I have the IP''s of most ISPs). The thing is that I I want to limit the international traffic too (I do not use BGP) and set it to 15 KB. Can someone help with this setup? Thanks! Best regards, -- George -- This message

Hi! Is it HTB fully compatible with BOND interface? I have this setup (mode= fault tolerance) : BOND0 -> ETH0 + ETH1 BOND1 -> ETH2 + ETH3 ( http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt ) HTB work very well with Class over BOND0. If I add Class for BOND1 it generate balance errors. Also with HTB.init

Hi, I''m trying to setup QoS in my TSL box. Following to mailing list reccomendations I changed PSCHED_CPU but can''t get accurate shaping with HTB. I have disabled HYSTERESIS also (by setting it to 0). I have Intel Celeron 1.8Mhz (TSC supported I think). ******** My script ****** tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 22 r2q 10 # Class corresponding interface

please, help, i have build vpn server (suse 9 + poptop), i have managed to implement tc htb in ip-up script, but every client has own ppp interface (ppp0, ppp1, ppp2...), and my idea is to share available bandwidth, not to limit connection, how to build root tc rule, when I have more then one interface?... please any one width experiance regards _______________________________________________

i got this problem, i want to shape my clients internet bw, but i don''t want to shape my local network traffic. For information, my clients using wireless to connect to my router[192.168.1.254]. when the clients request data from internet, example download from www.download.com, i want to shape his bandwidth, but when the clients [192.168.1.1] want to download from my file server example

Hi ; MY script: tc-htb3 qdisc del dev eth2 root ipchains -F tc-htb3 qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 10: htb default 20 r2q 40 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 50Mbit burst 2000 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:100 htb rate 12mbit ceil 50mbit prio 1 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:20 htb rate 38mbit ceil 50Mbit prio 8 ipchains

Hi all, Im new to all this, and am still trying to get my head qround some of the concepts of how this all works. Ive read the howto''s, man pages etc. Ive setup packet shaping on my router/server box using HTB and SFQ, but its not working the way i would like. Im after shaping that has "weights" for classes so that a lower priority class will slow down when a higher class

I''m trying to implement something similar the the diagram in section 9.5.2.1 in the LARTC HOWTO, but must have missed something somewhere :( I''m trying to hack up wondershaper, as it looked like a good place to start.. Here''s where I currently at, but I''ve tried alot of different things, all failing, some worse than others. The end result is to throttle back 126

Hello, I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn''t able to solve myself. I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet. Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want to divide with tc. When I see a packet being forwarded to one of these clients, I give it the appropriate unique mark: iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -d 192.168.34.141 -j MARK

I''m trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I''m getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What should I be doing differently here? tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil 100MBit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 110:

Hi, I''m trying to perform some (what I consider) basic traffic shaping on our network utilising HTB. I have mostly reused the example on the lartc.org site: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 24k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50mbit ceil 80mbit burst 19k tc class add dev eth0

Hi, I''m looking for a script in order to do traffic control on a ciber cafe LAN, with linux router. Ciber has about 40 hosts, and I haven''t much bandwidth (512kbit). Also, I''ve a squid cache and it works very good! I''ve found Jim QoS script, and FairNat. Which is more suitable for me ? Jim QoS ? FairNat ? other ? If I put FairNat, I would need ZPH patch

hello. i have following setup: a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge with 2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network) machine does not have any IP there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2 eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0 i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has 1mbit all our IP addresses are public and we have the

Hi to all I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on router: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit burst 15k tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq

Hi list, I''m playing with tc and found a strange behavior when I try to delete filters. For example, this simple scenario: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 100 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 128Kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 258Kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:100 htb rate 32Kbit tc filter add dev eth1 parent

Hey, I have such a script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:11 htb rate 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:21 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:23 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 1024kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:25 htb rate 3072kbit

Hello! I need to switch from htb2 to htb3, because of speed issues (for me, htb2 is unable to handle more then 100mbit duplex with ~550 classes), kernel profiling shows htb_dequeue_prio at 1st place with 3x isolation. So, I''ve moved from 2.4.19 to 2.4.25 kernel (hi-pac for classification/marking and htb3 for queueing), and traffic rate drop from 100 to 20mbit. What can be wrong? The