similar to: Classful Queuing

To stress the urgency and importance of my questions, I am willing to pay $100 to the first person that can provide me with the scripts/ rules that will work in my SnapGear firewalls that will solve the problems I am having. Please see the following post: Linux QOS and prioritization of real-time data (RTP/VoIP) Thank you!

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74002 Priority: medium Bug ID: 74002 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [un]docking Lenovo W530 results in interrupt storm QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: jcollins at

hi all. i am currently now serving PPPoE in my area. i had a script generated from tcng that worked perfectly before i started serving PPPoE. the issue is not in the script it self BUT in that "tc" code is not shaping on the ethernet anymore BUT INSTEAD on the pppX devices. I tested it and talking jargon, what should i do? The issue is that for each PPPoE login, PPPoE-server

helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth: we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that the borrowing method on one device by itself, e.g. ppp0, alone using HTB or the like. this means that i have to create for another device, e.g. ppp1,

Hi, I''m trying to build an ipsec gateway and somewhere I''m doing something wrong. I have a couple of routers that have clients in their back. All the routers are connected into a switch. In that switch I also have a computer that provides internet access to the clients. I would like to setup some sort of autentification (don''t need encryption), to allow me

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74123 Priority: medium Bug ID: 74123 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NVE7] windows maximize behind xfce4-panel until settings viewed QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

I have just installed Samba on RedHat Linux 6.2 which is working fine. However, I've noted that for every 20 minutes, the following error message being logged under log.nmb, [2001/04/17 14:29:27, 0] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_ fail(362) find_domain_master_name_query_fail: Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name HOME<1b> for the workgroup HOME. Unable

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2635 Bug ID: 2635 Summary: Unable to use SSH Agent and user level PKCS11Provider configuration directive Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi! I'm using asterisk with a few kphone SIP-Clients. The registration process seems quite OK. But there are some problems: Calling other registered users is possible, but the rtp-stream is not reaching the right port, so you can hear nothing. In ethereal you can see, that the SIP/SDP fields addresses different ports at each client, so client A sends to port 32000 but client B listens on

Hello Gurus, I am a small problem with routing and here are the details. Interfaces on my server: * ipsec0 - 172.19.58.94 * tunl0 - 172.19.58.94 * eth0 - 172.19.58.94 Now, the problem is that there is another host 172.19.58.200. All communication to 172.19.58.200 should be through tunl0, and all the data should be secured using IPSec (tunnel mode - because there are more machines on my

I have this: class htb 1:29 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 3000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1599b cburst 1611b Sent 33233 bytes 772 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 415 borrowed: 357 giants: 0 tokens: -3756376 ctokens: 128779 or this: class htb 1:21 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 3000bit ceil 100000bit burst 1599b cburst 1611b Sent 57554 bytes 618 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 193 borrowed: 425

Hi! I'm trying to increase security on my FreeBSD 4.8 firewall/DSL router/VPN router. My problem is with firewalling the VPN part. I'm using a tunnel to a RedHat 7.1 box running FreeS/WAN. This tunnel allows traffic from my internal net (172.17.0.0/24) to that box only: spdadd 172.17.0.0/24 $REDHAT/32 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/$MYADDR-$REDHAT/unique; spdadd $REDHAT/32 172.17.0.0/24

I would like to differentiate incoming traffic streams to guarantee minimum bandwidth to some services. However, as per the Adv-Routing-HOWTO it appears that only outgoing traffic can be shaped. Is this correct or is there a way of shaping incoming traffic? The problem could possibly be overcome if there is a way of routing traffic through a virtual host. Any tips on how to go about that? --

I hate to bring this thread back to life, but... > it may be possible to get it supported, do you think the price >point is remotely competitive with Digium hardware? Also as I am not >about to divulge my information to them to look in the downloads >section, what is the licensing of their SDK? What is the licensing of >the driver? > >Steven >On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 14:52,

Hello all, I have a problem with one of my routing requirements when using IPSec along with a proprietary Mobile IP implementation. And sorry for such a long mail :( Here is a brief description of my situation: My client (mobile-node) has an IP address of 10.10.10.40, my gateway (actually home-agent) has an IP address of 10.10.10.1 and systems in my home network are in 10.0.0.0 network.

Hello, I use Julian Anastasov ''routes'' (to be more specific: static_routes, alt_routes and nf_reroute) patches on a 2.4.32 kernel. On the same host I run IPSec. I have discovered after a few hours of networking problems that, when IPSec is enabled on that patched kernel, inspecting packets with tcpdump while arping-ing a host from a network physically connected to this

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, been awhile since I''ve written. I now have a situation where I get to use traffic shaping for a client. ~ We implemented the WonderShaper script on our own firewall and experienced no problems. I made some modifications to it to add IPSec protocol packets into the 1:10 high priority class using the u32 filter. ~ So far on our

Hello all. I'm a samba newbie given the task of setting up samba to act as a print server for 5 HP laser printers ranging from the LaserJet 4MV to the LaserJet 8150N. I've done a search of the samba mailing list archives to see if my problem has already been addressed, but I have been unable to find anything that refers to the same error I'm receiving. I am using SWAT to administer

Hi, Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network 10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22 All traffic starts on my side, so if I can