similar to: weird problem with ip+snat+tun0

What challenge this would solve ? VPN software in general tries to be another router when running in server mode with multiple clients. This restricts VPN customers from having complex topology. For instance, I'd like to have two tunnels between each client network and each server (with two broadband connections on each end), with some OSPF running and automatically switching from one to

Hello Samba experts, Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!! I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to "see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2 workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when

Hi - I''ve been looking around for simple answers to this for a while now, but haven''t been able to find any HOW-TO type documentation. I am administering a site with a remote location connected primarily via a cipe tunnel over a SHDSL connection. We also have a direct PSTN connection between the sites. Seeing as phone calls here are not timed I plan to keep the PSTN connection

Hi all, I have a strange situation. I have a machine connected to an AT&T VPN. Sometimes the VPN gets disconnected, so I create a cronjob to restart the VPN client when it happens: Problem is: sshd seem doesn't want to bind to tun0. I restart ssh, network, no good. Anyone has any clue? So strange. Thank you.

I'm trying to set up tinc on a Solaris 8 machine, but am having some problems setting the MAC addres on the tun0 interface to fe:fd:0:0:0:0 The error I'm seeing is: ifconfig: set_phys_addr failed: dl_errno 7 errno 0 ifconfig: failed setting mac address on tun0 Has anyone successfully setup tinc & tun0 on a Solaris machine? Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Tim Evans --

Hi list, I use xen-unstable download by hg on 8.24, i create a guest os "freedos", it just display a black screen. Then i destroy the guest os by "xm destroy",I closed. And then message jump out: =========================================== localhost kernel:unregister_netdevice:waiting for tun0 to became free. Usage count=1 Message from syslogd@localhost at Fri Aug 26

Hi, i bought some VPS with KVM virtualization. I installed tinc 1.1-pre9 as usual... Have multiple servers with this working but now i got the following error... tincd -D -d -n NETWORK tincd 1.1pre9 (Jan 30 2014 11:09:17) starting, debug level 1 /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Listening on 31.XXX.XXX.46 port 655 SIOCSIFADDR: No such device tun0: ERROR

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:19:10PM +0100, SHAD0WRUNNER at gmx.de wrote: > I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a bridge and > assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All guests have an > ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests in this > libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the host. [...] > and tinc.conf like this

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:46:24PM +0100, shad0wrunner at gmx.de wrote: > >> I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a > >> bridge and assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All > >> guests have an ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests > >> in this libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the

On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, shad0wrunner at gmx.de wrote: > Sorry, I don't get it. I thought the Subnet parameter is indented for > routing local nets to the remote host. > This way a remote host can access the provided local nets. > > What I have is my host A with vms (ips within 192.168.1.0/24). > My host A has a bridge to the vm's network. The bridge has the IP >

Hello Dieter, could it be that your tinc node adds the route 192.168.1.0/24 and that libvirt later fails when it tries to configure the local bridge and add the same route? You could verify this by adding some output (writing a log file?) to the subnet-up script. If this should be the case then you need to find out, why tinc calls the subnet-up script for its own local subnets. Maybe there are

Hi everybody and merry Chrissy! I have smb listening to two interfaces and with tun0 this failed. Package was from Debian 7 - 2:3.6.6-6+deb7u4 # smbclient //10.9.8.1/public -Unot_a_user Enter not_a_user's password: Connection to 10.9.8.1 failed (Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED) # smbclient //127.0.0.1/public -Unot_a_user Enter not_a_user's password: Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix]

Hello all, We have a few aliased Ethernet addresses on our server and if I do not use the Bind statement in the "Global" section then the NMBD seems to try to bind to all of the addresses. We are actually using OpenVPN which make the connections just fine on a 172.16.x.x subnet to "tun0" device. The problem is that Samba does not seem to find the tun0 device and reports

>> I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a >> bridge and assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All >> guests have an ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests >> in this libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the host. >[...] >> and tinc.conf like this >[...] >> Interface = tun0 >>

>> >> Nice hint, but it's not this simple. Libvirt complains about the >> network not the interface. The interfaces have different names already. >> It seems like tinc bind the subnet on startup and libvirt doesn't >> like it > Well, if it's about the subnet, then it's up to you to change the > Subnets in the host config files (and change

>> Sorry, I don't get it. I thought the Subnet parameter is indented for >> routing local nets to the remote host. >> This way a remote host can access the provided local nets. >> >> What I have is my host A with vms (ips within 192.168.1.0/24). >> My host A has a bridge to the vm's network. The bridge has the IP >> 192.168.1.1. Furthor more

Hi, I am running OpenVPN where i have one central hub VPN server, and multiple spoke VPN clients. I can ping from each client to the server and each client to computers on the subnet which the server resides (192.168.2.0/24) so it works ok there. I cannot however, ping from one client to another client. I guess the packet path would go: clienta -> vpn -> shorewall/router -> vpn ->

Hello I am using openssh as vpn on a router with freewrt.org and rsync to sync my local data to a remote server. Everything works fine for me so far. The only problem is that the channel-1 (tun0) goes down on the router after 50-200MB transfered via tun0 or after 5-20 hours only with a ping to the server . Channel-0 is still working. Tcpdump shows that a ping from the router to the server via

Buenas tardes, Necesito obtener informaci?n de la cantidad de tuneles ssh que puede tener activo un servidor y adem?s por cuanto tiempo pueden permanecer activos estos tuneles. Explico mi situaci?n, tengo un servidor centos 5.5, con sistema ssh que viene por defecto la versi?n 4.3. A este servidor se conectan alrededor de 100 terminales, cada uno de estos terminales levantan 3 tuneles contra el