similar to: Re: Re: What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class foraccurate operation?

Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote: > My ISP provides guarantied 115kbit bandwidth for GLOBAL TRAFFIC. During the low load period (early morning, evening, night) customers can get up to 1mbit traffic. That''s download traffic we''re talking about, since you seem to be shaping on your local LAN interface? Variable rate ISPs are tough to shape right, I guess... Does this 115kbit vs.

Hi, I''m trying to setup QoS in my TSL box. Following to mailing list reccomendations I changed PSCHED_CPU but can''t get accurate shaping with HTB. I have disabled HYSTERESIS also (by setting it to 0). I have Intel Celeron 1.8Mhz (TSC supported I think). ******** My script ****** tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 22 r2q 10 # Class corresponding interface

Hello LARTC, Internet connection - ADSL, interface nas0 (115kbit guarantied, up to 1mbit possible. Depends on ISP load, impossible to guess). Internal interface LAN, eth0. Is it possible to successfully shape download traffic on eth0 using HTB? Classes must have guarantied rate calculated from 115kbit possible rate (for example 3 classes) and the possibility to borrow up to 1mbit (depends on ISP

>Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far. > >I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and >while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to >know more about packets than I ever wanted to know. > >I have two university buildings with a 1mb connection to the Internet. The >two buildings (on either side of town) are

Hello LARTC, Description of situation ================= I have two ADSL connections, one at work (ISP #1) and one at home (different ISP #2). At work I have Linux box for firewalling and NAT (and 5 PC-s in internal - LAN #1). The same is for home (1 Linux box, 1 notebook - LAN #2). Both ADSL connections has bandwidth limiting only for GLOBAL resources (160kbit for ISP #1 and 115kbit for ISP#2),

Hi I am current trying to set up a guaranteed minimum rate for the leaf (1:1x). Also would I be correct in saying that the quantum is the dividing rule (so if I keep it the same "1532" and keep all the leafs in "1:1x" prio 3 they should all get the same amount of bandwidth shared across them equally?). For example below would the "rate" in the "1:1x" leaf

Is there any problem to run icecast as a normal user? I know that if run along with liveice, I'll have to setup /dev/dsp to that user, but what about TCP/IP ports? Will it be able to run normally or I have to run it as root? Will this help in the stability of the system? This would allow a crash to only crash the user's memory space and not the system's space. Any suggestion is

Hello, I have CentOS 5.2 installed on two of the afore-mentioned blades. I've noticed that the OS started to crash lately (kernel panic) and I've been assigned the task to troubleshoot this issue. I would like to know what is the best way of recovering the kernel dump after the OS crashes. I know there are two software implementations that would enable me to do this, kexec and

Hello I am trying to attach pfifo_fast to af leaf htb class. But tc segmenetation faults. If I try the failing command throug strace, it shows me that the last thing tc tries to do just before the segmentation fault, is to try to open a file called "/usr/lib/tc/q_pfifo_fast.so". Of course i have tried to find worthfull information around the Internet, but haven''t found

Hello, I have a linux bridge setup and am using HTB to bandwidth manage traffic passing through the bridge. I want to manage "some" of the traffic passing through the bridge. I figured I can do this if I dont define a "default" class on the qdisc. I will only config classes for traffic I want to manage. Assume that i Have traffic for network 10.0.0.0/24 passing through the

Thank you Andy! I did''t find why I could''t use the fw match in ingress. Now it works. Now I ran into another problem: When I try to add a pfifo_fast leaf qdisc dor htb classes it seg.-faults. Is pfifo_fast a special qdisc? I can succesfully add other type of qdiscs. I found that a similar problem was reported in february on a MIPS architecture. root@zefir:/usr/src# tc qdisc

Hello. So as my english is not so good, i'll try to write my story in bash commands :o) miwa@zork3$ uname -mrs FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE i386 miwa@zork3$ su root@zork3# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/nat root@zork3# make && make install root@zork3# cd ../nut-usb root@zork3# make && make install root@zork3# cd /usr/local/etc/nut root@zork3# cat ups.conf user=root [MGE-Ellipse]

Hello, can anyone help me please? I have installed libxml2, libogg, libvorbis, and then i have cvsed and installed libshout (autogen.sh && make && make install). Then I cvsed ices and tried to run autogen.sh. It just quit with: checking for shout-config... /usr/local/bin/shout-config checking libshout settings Using libshout config in /usr/local/bin/shout-config checking

I''m currently developing a photo gallery website with Rails. Each photo can be commented upon. What I''d like to do is, once the user posts a comment, use AJAX to submit the comment and then automatically update the page with the comment the user just submitted. I also don''t want to use Prototype or the built in AJAX that comes with Rails... it''s too fat

Hello, What would you recommend for producing publication-quality plots with R? Built-in graphics, trellis, ggplot2, or something else? Basic requirements: - I need to draw line-, box-, density-plots, bar-charts and histograms - error bars on bar- and box-plots - easy tiling of multiple plots on a single "page" Basic R plotting with mfrow and mfcol parameters is not satisfactory

Is there a way of pulling individual leaf nodes out of the tc -s class show dev <thx> command? Say, similar to: tc -s class show dev eth0 parent 1:1 except for an individual leaf: tc -s class show dev eth0 leaf 1:12 Or, better year, is there a way to log or store statistics, so that you can pull up such things as max rate, max pps, max backlog, etc. - not just the

Hello, I''m using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it''s correct and determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes. Thanks Nikolay G.K

What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is exceeding the ceil, (i watched it for a few minutes, it didn''t slow down). Anyone know how to fix this? class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped

--On Friday, January 24, 2003 1:59 PM -0700 Steve Fink <stevef@netvantix.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 08:31, Tom Eastep wrote: >> >> >> --On Friday, January 24, 2003 8:20 AM -0700 Steve Fink >>> <stevef@netvantix.com> wrote: >>> >>> http://leaf.netvantix.com/012303/swstatus.txt >>> >> >> It looks like your

Dear mailinglist members, I have the following problem: I run a decision tree using the rpart function and, afterwords, I try to find to which leaf node a new register (not used to build the decision tree) belongs to. I will try to explain better: rpart.tree <- rpart(target.value ~., data) leaf.node <- new.function(rpart.tree, new.register) The new register has all the explanatory values