similar to: Huge system load using HTB

Hi Nithya, I see index in context: [2017-07-07 10:07:18.230202] E [MSGID: 106062] [glusterd-utils.c:7997:glusterd_volume_rebalance_use_rsp_dict] 0-glusterd: failed to get index I wonder if there is anything I can do to fix it. I was trying to strace gluster process but still have no clue what exactly is gluster index. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nithya

Hi Nithya, the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large attachments. Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? Unfortunately index is popular word, so googling is not very helpful. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at

Hi Szymon, I have received the files and will take a look and get back to you. In what context are you seeing index? Thanks, Nithya On 11 July 2017 at 01:15, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large > attachments. > Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? > Unfortunately

Where did you read 2k IOPS? Each disk is able to do about 75iops as I'm using SATA disk, getting even closer to 2000 it's impossible Il 13 ott 2017 9:42 AM, "Szymon Miotk" <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Depends what you need. > 2K iops for small file writes is not a bad result. > In my case I had a system that was just poorly written and it was >

Hello everyone, I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. Gluster version is 3.7.3. My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. Rebooting Gluster nodes doesn't help. # gluster volume rebalance gsae_artifactory_cluster_storage start volume rebalance:

On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. > Gluster version is 3.7.3. > My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks > to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. > But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. > Rebooting Gluster

Hi! I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing. I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from close ftp server. I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs: __________ | eth1|---- ISP1 | | internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2 net | | (~300 | eth3|---- ISP3 hosts

Cleanup the names of variables that refer to the hyperv_device abstraction. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc_drv.c | 12 ++--

Cleanup the names of variables that refer to the hyperv_device abstraction. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc_drv.c | 12 ++--

Hello! I have access server with 4 uplinks (nice, huh?). I ran RedHat 7.3. Yesterday I did an upgrade to RedHat 9. After upgrade Linux says the third link is bad: # ip route show 2.2.2.0/30 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.0/30 dev eth4 scope link src 4.4.4.4 3.3.3.0/29 dev eth3 scope link src 3.3.3.3 1.1.1.0/28 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 scope link

I want to limit each user in my network to have limited bandwidth (let''s say 256/128 kbit). I use NAT (done with iptables). Can I limit users on the outgoing interface using u32 using rules like: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 17 u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 It seem I made a mistake somewhere or NAT is done before routing and I must use iptables

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

Hi, I have a table for an 1 week exam result for many classes in school, like this: Day Class_ID Test Result 1 Monday 1 Paper Passed 2 Tuesday 1 Oral Passed 3 Friday 1 Paper Passed 4 Monday 3 Paper Passed 5 Sunday 3 Oral Passed 6 Monday 3

On 2019/10/17 ??12:53, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:31:25 +0000 > Parav Pandit <parav at mellanox.com> wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:53 AM >>> To: Parav Pandit <parav at mellanox.com> >>> Cc: Alex Williamson

On 2019/10/17 ??12:53, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:31:25 +0000 > Parav Pandit <parav at mellanox.com> wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:53 AM >>> To: Parav Pandit <parav at mellanox.com> >>> Cc: Alex Williamson

The title says it all. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc_drv.c | 46 +++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c | 44 +++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c | 36

The title says it all. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc_drv.c | 46 +++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c | 44 +++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c | 36

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:03:26 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Mdev bus only supports vfio driver right now, so it doesn't implement > match method. But in the future, we may add drivers other than vfio, > one example is virtio-mdev[1] driver. This means we need to add device > class id support in bus match method to pair the mdev device and mdev > driver

On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:07:47 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Mdev bus only supports vfio driver right now, so it doesn't implement > match method. But in the future, we may add drivers other than vfio, > the first driver could be virtio-mdev. This means we need to add > device class id support in bus match method to pair the mdev device > and mdev

On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:07:47 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Mdev bus only supports vfio driver right now, so it doesn't implement > match method. But in the future, we may add drivers other than vfio, > the first driver could be virtio-mdev. This means we need to add > device class id support in bus match method to pair the mdev device > and mdev